Skip to comments.
***BREAKING***Al Qaeda recruits oil-field attackers; Targets Kuwaiti, Saudi resources
Drudge Report ^
Posted on 03/10/2003 8:03:17 PM PST by SamAdams76
By Bill Gertz: Al Qaeda is seeking recruits in the Middle East for terrorist attacks on oil fields in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait in the event of U.S. military action against Iraq, U.S. intelligence officials say... MORE... The al Qaeda recruitment is targeting radical Islamists in Saudi Arabia and Yemen who are willing to conduct suicide attacks and other sabotage against the oil fields outside Iraq, the WASHINGTON TIMES will report on Tuesday. The threats to oil facilities highlight the possibility that military acton will disrupt the flow of oil from the Middle East, where most of the world´s oil originates... Developing...
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: oilfields
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-89 next last
If I'm not first with this, please delete.
To: SamAdams76
Invest in Red Buttons or whatever that guy's name is that puts out the fires.
2
posted on
03/10/2003 8:05:34 PM PST
by
Fred Mertz
(Red Adair???)
To: SamAdams76
Al Qaeda is seeking recruits in the Middle East for terrorist attacks on oil fields in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait in the event of U.S. military action against Iraq, U.S. intelligence officials say... Well, well. Things are going to get interesting now.
3
posted on
03/10/2003 8:05:48 PM PST
by
Howlin
(Only UNamericans put the UN before America!)
To: Fred Mertz
LOL....Red Adair; he retired. He's about 88.
4
posted on
03/10/2003 8:06:10 PM PST
by
Howlin
(Only UNamericans put the UN before America!)
To: Howlin
It was Alan Adale.
5
posted on
03/10/2003 8:07:09 PM PST
by
Consort
To: SamAdams76
Wonderful. Now we'll all pay $3.00 per gallon. I do hope the Saudis use real troops instead of the Bedouin rejects to protect their fields.
6
posted on
03/10/2003 8:07:27 PM PST
by
Beck_isright
(going to the war without the french is like duck hunting without your accordian)
To: SamAdams76
Gertz, although a good reporter, does seem to over dramatize his news at times. He might be right this time but I have started to not be overexcited about his "breaking news"
7
posted on
03/10/2003 8:07:32 PM PST
by
dwilli
To: Howlin
This just underscores the need to get our military in there and get the job done. Enough fussing with the diplomacy. Especially since France guarantees the veto. Why would they want to destroy their perfect record of appeasement?
8
posted on
03/10/2003 8:07:34 PM PST
by
SamAdams76
(California wine tastes better - boycott French wine!)
To: Consort
Well, he may have been there, too, but the "big guy" is Red Adair.
9
posted on
03/10/2003 8:07:45 PM PST
by
Howlin
(Only UNamericans put the UN before America!)
To: Fred Mertz
It's Red Adair and he no longer actively putting out fires, but his company will accomodate any situation.
10
posted on
03/10/2003 8:08:09 PM PST
by
Adrastus
To: Adrastus
11
posted on
03/10/2003 8:08:44 PM PST
by
Howlin
(Only UNamericans put the UN before America!)
To: SamAdams76
i notice that al Qaeda isn't willing to do these suicide attacks themselves......phewee to them!
To: SamAdams76
I think you were first Sam......
This was expected, in fact, I believe these scenarios were raised last fall around the time of the first resolution. The Saudi fields in particular....
They'll (Al Queda) will have limited success in this endeavor but at a great cost to them. The only reason they would have any success is due to the large area that must be protected. The pipelines are the most vulnerable and unprotected. The refineries will be tough. The oil fields could get hit but only a few well heads at a time... before they get too far they would be dead.
NeverGore
13
posted on
03/10/2003 8:09:58 PM PST
by
nevergore
(Just kiddin!)
To: SamAdams76
14
posted on
03/10/2003 8:10:11 PM PST
by
SamAdams76
(California wine tastes better - boycott French wine!)
To: nevergore
What about our pipelines and refineries domestically? That is what I'm worried as hell about.
15
posted on
03/10/2003 8:11:37 PM PST
by
Beck_isright
(going to the war without the french is like duck hunting without your accordian)
To: SamAdams76
Why would they want to destroy their perfect record of appeasement?
You are too kind... their record is not one of appeasement, but of treason, betrayal and jew hatred... they participated in the holocaust. France, Germany, together again... just like the old days. The good French, and I am convinced there are some... are the minority and I personally implore them to get the hell outta dodge... before it is too late. It is nearly too late now, in my view.
To: dwilli
Ditto,, this guy Gertz cries big time wolf more than I can name,, I don't pay attention to him anymore,, how many misses on huge terrorist attacks he predicted never came to pass?,,,, LOTS!
17
posted on
03/10/2003 8:12:55 PM PST
by
Lib-Lickers 2
(God Bless Our Military)
To: SamAdams76
OK, Call me dumb, but couldn't we simply drop a big, asbestos dome over a flaming well and seal off all the O2 from the fire? Or, perhaps hit it with a Daisycutter that would suck all the air from it?
18
posted on
03/10/2003 8:13:04 PM PST
by
RandallFlagg
(MustFReepMustFReepMustFReepMustFReepMustFReepMustFReep)
To: SamAdams76
Beware of joggers in the oilfields trying to light their shoes on fire.
Really, this is pretty stupid. It's not that easy to destroy an oilfield, and it wouldn't be hard seeing someone trying to do so.
Mining a field with explosive is fairly easy if you control the fields, like Saddam did in Kuwait. But they are probably the least vulnerable part of the whole oil to your gas tank equation.
19
posted on
03/10/2003 8:13:05 PM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: SamAdams76
This is a real ugly thing. My dad worked for ARAMCO from '54-84. Started out as the start-up foreman for the Abqaiq LPG plant, retired as a senior VP.
During the early 80s, when I was a little airborne snuffie, I puffed up and said "We'll jump in and take the oil. We're Airborne."
He said something to the effect of "Son, we've got 20,000 employees. 2,000 of them know enough to shut us down with nothing more than a pickup truck and a lighter. The rest could figure it out if they were motivated."
Petrochem plants are big, require lots of folks, and are inherently dangerous. Someone with just a little smarts, and who is willing to die, can do a lot of damage.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-89 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson