Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nashville Woman Fired for Anti-War Letter (wrote to Charlie Daniels)
Newschannel 5 Nashville ^ | 3/10/03 | staff

Posted on 03/10/2003 7:30:17 PM PST by GailA

Nashville Woman Fired for Anti-War Letter

A woman was fired from her job at Jones Media after replying to an e-mail written by country singer Charlie Daniels.

Tamara Saviano worked for Jones Media Networks and Great American Country on Music row for three years. She was fired last Friday for responding to an e-mail written by Charlie Daniels.

In his e-mail, Daniels blasted Hollywood and the media for protesting a possible war with Iraq. His publicist, Kirk Webster sent the e-mail to people in the music and media industry.

When Saviano got the letter at her personal e-mail address, she wrote Webster and Daniels back outlining her anti-war beliefs.

Webster says Saviano put her company name on her e-mail and that’s why he called Jones Media. But Saviano says it was clear her e-mail expressed her personal beliefs.

Webster says Charlie Daniels had nothing to do with Saviano’s firing.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Political Humor/Cartoons; US: Tennessee
KEYWORDS: antiwar; charliedaniels
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-133 next last
To: SEAL6
Ping jockey and you should stick to more docile threads.
61 posted on 03/10/2003 9:40:12 PM PST by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
Chill, Fred. We love ya man!
62 posted on 03/10/2003 9:41:26 PM PST by SEAL6 (Find me, ya gotta be lucky..Catch me, ya gotta be good..defeat me, ya gotta be kidding.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
Personally, I wouldn't have fired her, but its not my company.

If it were my company, and I was paying the rent, the insurance, the utilities, the healthcare, the salaries, etc. I would want my right to fire whomever I pleased, for what ever reason I pleased, to be preserved.

It's supposed to be a free friggin country.

63 posted on 03/10/2003 9:43:15 PM PST by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: dead
But these rabid freepers want her burned at the stake. I don't understand that.
64 posted on 03/10/2003 9:45:42 PM PST by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
Fred, as long as you're still up, maybe you'll answer my question. Thanks.
65 posted on 03/10/2003 9:48:01 PM PST by SEAL6 (Find me, ya gotta be lucky..Catch me, ya gotta be good..defeat me, ya gotta be kidding.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: SEAL6
Anytime. You're welcome. And knock out fifty while you're at it, and 200 flutter-kicks too!

See you on the 'morrow.
66 posted on 03/10/2003 9:49:44 PM PST by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Question_Assumptions; O.C. - Old Cracker; Mulder
Thank God there are a few here who haven't forgotten recent experiences in being slammed everywhere for holding a contrary opinion and expressing it.

It is debilitating to hear the anti-free-speech expressions here. There are quite a number of conservatives who do not back the war. They are people who love America and many have given their health and service as vets. Many of them were spit upon for their service and well recall that no one withdrew the freedom of speech from those who railed at them and cursed them. In fact in recent years the people of this nation elected a man to the Presidency who had refused to serve and used freedom of speech to engender despising hate for them.

They and many other opposers of the conflict will not desert the troops or forsake the nation if we go to war but if they are mistreated you will drive them not to support any group which is seen to be at the base of the mistreatment, ESPECIALLY REGARDING FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION. If this nation has lost that Constitutionally articulated right we should mourn that death before we begin.

You wanted respect for your opinion when you were in the minority use wisdom then because what you "sow" may reap a bitter harvest if you do not and that may be all you have to ingest.
67 posted on 03/10/2003 9:50:08 PM PST by Spirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
Tempers are a little high these days, on both sides.

Everybody I work with is a hippy liberal, and then wouldn't mourn if I got fired fired for my FR comments.

Such is life.

(hopefully, nobody's monitoring me...)

68 posted on 03/10/2003 9:51:43 PM PST by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: genxer
"She was at work and should not be participating in personal activities. That's grounds for termination right there. If someone sends you an email to your work email address and its not work related, if you choose to answer that email on the clock you get what you deserve."

Good point. I have internet access at work but I only use it for company business. I express personal opinion on my personal internet account at home.

69 posted on 03/10/2003 9:52:02 PM PST by blackbart.223
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
Flutters done, but your post bordered on an insult. I'd just like to know what prompted it.
70 posted on 03/10/2003 9:56:37 PM PST by SEAL6 (Find me, ya gotta be lucky..Catch me, ya gotta be good..defeat me, ya gotta be kidding.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: OperationFreedom
LOL....too funny.

I must confess that at times I like Ill....long as we stay off Southern threads.

He is feisty.
71 posted on 03/10/2003 9:57:37 PM PST by wardaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Spirited
My responses in red:

Thank God there are a few here who haven't forgotten recent experiences in being slammed everywhere for holding a contrary opinion and expressing it. That hasn't stopped for either side of the debate. I've been slammed many times over the years for my beliefs, so what?

It is debilitating to hear the anti-free-speech expressions here. I am not advocating a repeal of the 1st Amendment, but I believe the intent of our founding fathers is radically different than those envisioned by the likes of Bill & Hill and the effete group of cocktail socialists who control most of the avenues of communication in America.

There are quite a number of conservatives who do not back the war. That's fine with me. I don't understand the paradox, but, unlike Iraq, America is a free country.

They are people who love America and many have given their health and service as vets. Many of them were spit upon for their service and well recall that no one withdrew the freedom of speech from those who railed at them and cursed them. And if you knew me, Spirited, you would know that I have the deepest respect for those who have gone to war in my place and seen the horror and been smeared with the blood of men who became closer to them than family. Again, let me repeat, I am not advocating the revocation of free speech, but I am not going to stand by passively and allow protesters to go by unchallenged once President Bush announces that we are officially at war with Iraq. To me, the line in the sand with these anti-war/anti-Bush protesters is drawn at that moment.

In fact in recent years the people of this nation elected a man to the Presidency who had refused to serve and used freedom of speech to engender despising hate for them. Bill Clinton is no better in my book than Jane Fonda. The less I talk about either of them, the lower my blood pressure remains.

They and many other opposers of the conflict will not desert the troops or forsake the nation if we go to war but if they are mistreated you will drive them not to support any group which is seen to be at the base of the mistreatment, ESPECIALLY REGARDING FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION. I got bits and pieces of this, but taken as a whole the thought was somewhat vague.

If this nation has lost that Constitutionally articulated right we should mourn that death before we begin. Assuming that you are referring to the 1st Amendment again, I could not agree more.

You wanted respect for your opinion when you were in the minority use wisdom then because what you "sow" may reap a bitter harvest if you do not and that may be all you have to ingest. Okay.

72 posted on 03/10/2003 10:41:03 PM PST by O.C. - Old Cracker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Question_Assumptions
Tennessee is a Right TO Work state. Few of the usual liberal worker protections are in effect here.
73 posted on 03/11/2003 3:48:47 AM PST by GailA (THROW AWAY THE KEYS http://keasl5227.tripod.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
I say the employer overreacted.

Sometimes you may have a "right" to do something that is not necessarily "right."

I'd've reprimanded the woman, and asked her to refrain in the furture from doing this.

BTW, how many FReepers do you reckon are using their company time and company computers right now to participate?

Do you favor all of them being fired?
74 posted on 03/11/2003 5:30:26 AM PST by Illbay (Don't believe every tagline you read - including this one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: O.C. - Old Cracker
They had their opportunity to speak, so until the Commander-in-Chief gives the order to stand down, then, in my book, they are committing treason.

So when Klinton was ordering troops into Haiti, Somalia, Bosnia, etc...., am I to beleive that you did not critisize him? Or were you guilty of treason, by your own nazi-like definition?

Good grief, Jane Fonda never had to answer to any U.S. official for her treason! That doesn't lessen the reality of her crimes. A trip to the gallows would be my prescription.

Do you really not see the difference between engaging in Free speech and sitting in an anti-aircraft gun used against Americans pilots?

Before you start tossing around charges of "treason", you need to look at who sold Iraq some of their weapons and who told them it was okay to invade Kuwait the first time. They have more American blood on their hands than anyone who disagrees with this war.

75 posted on 03/11/2003 5:32:31 AM PST by Mulder (It's all for nothing if you don't have Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: O.C. - Old Cracker
If they are anti-American, then they need to keep their mouths shut while our soldiers are fighting,...

You're wrong. They have no responsibility to "keep their mouths shut." In fact, they have the RIGHT to speak out.

Too many ignorant people here and elsewhere have no clue or concept of what is meant by "treason" or "sedition." It is NOT treasonous to speak your mind. It is not seditious to exercise your right of free speech.

If you and people like you are going to be so ignorant on this issue, then I invite you to refrain from EVER mentioning the Bill of Rights again.

76 posted on 03/11/2003 5:32:59 AM PST by Illbay (Don't believe every tagline you read - including this one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
Hi Mulder, I believe I'm turning anti-war again.

Very ungood. I think you need to turn yourself in to Homeland Security for thoughtcrime.

Some of the statist anti-Freedom attitudes here are quite disgusting. As someone once said, most people don't want Freedom; they just want a tyranny to their liking.

BTW, just for kicks I'm reading "1984" again.... it's pretty chilling to see the similarities between his book and modern-day Amerika. Orwell was off by about 20 years.

77 posted on 03/11/2003 5:36:17 AM PST by Mulder (It's all for nothing if you don't have Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: GailA
She used company resources for personal use. Most likely the company has an E-mail policy covering this - most do. So it is likely that she would have been fired for unautherized use of company resources per policy and not because of the content of the email.
78 posted on 03/11/2003 5:39:24 AM PST by Abogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Question_Assumptions
Using your theory of "receiving an e-mail.

Don't care who you are, your e-mail address belongs to your company not you. It was setup for you as an employee to provide services for your employer. Anything being sent using that address must not be "personal".

She deserves to be fired. Just as govt. employees using their business e-mail address shouldn't be using it to campaign, or lobby.

What comes from that address better be business related.
79 posted on 03/11/2003 5:47:12 AM PST by ODDITHER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
They have no responsibility to "keep their mouths shut." In fact, they have the RIGHT to speak out.

If this idea of "it's treason to critisize the gov't during war" ever takes hold, it won't be very long before some tyrant decides that the best way to prevent dissent is to simply have a perpetual war.

And that would be far more dangerous than any words from an anti-war protestor.

BTW, on a side note, this world would be a much better place if more people throughout history had listened to anti-war protestors since the overwhelming majority of wars fought on this planet have been for the wrong reasons.

80 posted on 03/11/2003 5:55:27 AM PST by Mulder (It's all for nothing if you don't have Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-133 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson