Skip to comments.
CLINTON IS EVEN ODDS TO BE APPROVED AS THE NEXT SECRETARY GENERAL
Pittburgh Tribune ^
| Re-Print March 10, 2003 Original Feb 16, 2003
Posted on 03/10/2003 8:33:32 AM PST by kinghorse
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:02:49 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Once again the future of Bill Clinton has become a hot topic that rivals
(Excerpt) Read more at pittsburghlive.com ...
TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antichrist; clinton; secgenclinton; un; worldgovernment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-119 next last
To: ewing
I think this came out the tabloid Weekly World News.
If you check out the fine print on the UN Charter you should see that no citizen of a permanent member of the Security Council can be a Secretary General. The US would either have to pull out of the UN or clintoon would have to renounce his US citizenship.
Semper Fi
21
posted on
03/10/2003 8:44:37 AM PST
by
dd5339
(Lookout Texas here we come!)
To: sheik yerbouty
""Bill the Beast"? Does anyone really know who his father really was?"
Could it perhaps be..............Satan?? Now, wouldn't that be special......................
22
posted on
03/10/2003 8:45:25 AM PST
by
tracer
(/b>)
To: kinghorse
Clinton does not want to be UN Secretary General. He just wants publicity so that he will seem relevant. He is not. Nor is ever going to accept such a post...that would involve having to work! Clinton just wants to be talked about.
Of course the rest of the world applauds this ridiculous idea. Why? Because such a move would take political oxygen from the Bush administration (which will never approve the appointment anyway) and generally lessens US power and prestige.
Here is some advice: Next time you see some news story saying Clinton may do this or may do that, don't believe a word of it. These stories are floated by Clinton and the Democrat machine to make him appear more relevant than he is.
23
posted on
03/10/2003 8:45:28 AM PST
by
OldCorps
To: 1Old Pro
As long as the U.N has long since been disbanded.
Or relocated to some glorious third world location.
24
posted on
03/10/2003 8:45:38 AM PST
by
mr.pink
To: kinghorse
Assuming the US has veto power, the purpose of the Clinton candidacy will be to divide the country over what they think is a "bedrock" issue and open the way for a "more reasonable" Hillary to take the presidency.
The pressure on W not to veto will be enormous. He can't let it happen, even if he loses the presidency over it. If the given reason for the veto is conflict of interest (being forced to work against his own country), I "think" it will fly. He also needs to find a palatable alternative to the Slickster (any suggestions?).
God help us if we ever have the Witch in the White House and the ARIFPOTUS (Accused Rapist and Impeached Former President of the United States) in charge of the UN.
To: kinghorse
"the Chinese love Bill almost as much as Monica did."
That's the best line in the article.
666 and the man with the mark of the beast on his forehead (remember Gorbachev and his Green Cross?)--wouldn't they make a great One World Co-Dictator!
To: kinghorse
The current anti-American attitude in the UN will not permit any American to get that job......ever!
To: kinghorse
I guarantee you the active revolution will start with this person if he is elected & we stay in that organization. I wish a few here would understand that this "Two-Party Cartel" is a shame to working taxpaying Americans. Look at the Klintoons appointments that are STILL in place. This is by no way NMO just a coincidence. Do any of you feel confident in Mueller? Why didn't GW go after the Klintoons or any of their ilk? 80% of Americans want the borders secured - it will never happen under this cartel. I'm now afraid that a candidate opposing this cartel will never make it even if the sheeple want it 80%. As GW said, "You are either with us or against us". I say you either kick this "Two-Party Cartel" out or you become a slave to this New World Order.
28
posted on
03/10/2003 8:47:54 AM PST
by
Digger
To: kinghorse
The United Nations charter specifically states the that the Secretary General cannot be from a nation that is a permanent member of the Security Council.
The United States is a permanent member of the Security Council.
To: kinghorse
RAPIST
LIAR
SECRETARY GENERAL
It fits!
30
posted on
03/10/2003 8:49:50 AM PST
by
Uncle Miltie
(Wheat is Murder! (Tilling slaughters worms.....))
To: kinghorse
"THE ANTI CHRIST IS SURFACING"
UNITED STATES COLLEGES, THE UNITED NATIONS ARE TERRORIST BREEDING GROUNDS WITH TERRORIST PROFESSORS, UN MEMBERS AND X PRESIDENTS. FOR TOO LONG THIS HAS BEEN CONSIDERED OPEN AND FREE SPEACH, SELF EXPRESSION, OR SOME OTHER ACADEMIC BUZZ WORD FOR ANTI AMERICAN CONDUCT. EVERY COLLEGE IN THIS COUNTRY AND EVERY OFFICE IN THE UNITED NATIONS SHOULD BE GONE OVER WITH A FINE TOOTH COMB.
EVERY PROFESSOR SHOULD BE INVESTEGATED, EVERY SECRETARY GENERAL "INCLUDING CLINTON", AND EVERY UN MEMBER AND OFFICE SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED.
I'LL BET THE JAILS WOULD BE FULL OF STUDENTS, PROFESSORS, UN MEMBERS and X PRESIDENTS.
To: OldCorps
I'm sorry to disagree with you. Being in charge of the UN won't even feel like "work" to him--waited on hand and foot (and God knows where else), constantly debating the pros and cons of ideas in a vacuum, never having to accomplish anything meaningful, never held accountable).
I believe he wants it, and he would get it if a Democratic adminstration ever gets in the White House again, even with a GOP congress.
To: kinghorse
Like France would ever put up with
any American in this position.
Clinton pays some hacks to put out stories like this every once in a while. Remember when he was going to become president of Oxford?
It's like those dopey teen movies where the unpopular kid pays some chick to pretend to be his girlfriend, with the idea that it will get some other girls interested in him.
He's looking for a high profile position with international clout and a soapbox for him to spout from. But nobody wants him and his baggage.
He'll be hosting the Adult Video Awards in a couple of years.
33
posted on
03/10/2003 8:50:43 AM PST
by
dead
To: kinghorse
"CLINTON IS EVEN ODDS TO BE APPROVED AS THE NEXT SECRETARY GENERAL"
Another reason to withdraw from the U.N. and move it overseas.
34
posted on
03/10/2003 8:51:10 AM PST
by
Beck_isright
(going to the war without the french is like duck hunting without your accordian)
To: PhiKapMom
United States will veto as you cannot have a new Secretary General approved without all five positive votes from permanent members of the Security Council. The Bush Administration would veto
A future Hillery Clinton administration would be another story. Get Bill into power, then Hillery works to submit the US to UN power. Finally Emperor Bill gets the Secretary-Generalship hereditory...
35
posted on
03/10/2003 8:52:14 AM PST
by
SauronOfMordor
(Heavily armed, easily bored, and off my medication)
To: kinghorse
hillary as president and bill as head of the UN.....end of civilization as we know it. apocalypse now. The Beast.
To: kinghorse
Does anyone have Tony Soprano's phone number?
37
posted on
03/10/2003 8:53:37 AM PST
by
bruin66
To: kinghorse
X42 probably believes that the Secretary-General is in charge of all the UN secretaries...
An irrelevant man for a soon-to-be irrelevant organization.
38
posted on
03/10/2003 8:53:45 AM PST
by
mikrofon
(Saddam: a 'Pax Americana' on your house!)
To: kinghorse
Does the U.N. have cute staffers? Bill probably figures it would be like an international smorgasbord!
39
posted on
03/10/2003 8:56:21 AM PST
by
Plutarch
To: kinghorse
GOD help us all!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-119 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson