Skip to comments.
US fines space firms over China
BBC ^
| March 8, 2003
Posted on 03/08/2003 9:18:45 AM PST by Indy Pendance
The United States Government has imposed a $32m fine on aerospace companies Boeing Satellite Systems and Hughes Electronics, after accusing them of supplying sensitive space technology to China.
The US State Department charged the two companies last December with more than 120 violations of export laws in connection with the transfer of satellite and rocket data to China.
Both companies said they accepted they could have harmed the security and foreign policy interests of the United States by providing the information and expressed regret.
The charges related to technical information Hughes officials are alleged to have given China after Chinese rocket launches carrying US satellites failed in 1995 and 1996.
Boeing was cited because in 2000 it acquired Hughes Space and Communications - then a division of Hughes Electronics.
Previous settlement
US officials had previously pointed out that there were many similarities between a space launch vehicle and an intercontinental ballistic missile.
A year ago another aerospace company, Loral Space & Communications, reached a settlement with the State Department over similar charges.
Loral agreed to pay $20 million in fines, but neither admitted nor denied wrongdoing.
American companies began using Chinese rockets in the 1980s to launch satellites.
After several failed launches, Hughes and Loral participated in studies examining possible causes of the failures.
Congressional investigations in the 1990s found that China had gained information on missiles from those reviews.
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
To: Indy Pendance
This absolutely is not good enough. Theynew what they were doing. "GREED"
2
posted on
03/08/2003 9:21:41 AM PST
by
chachacha
To: Indy Pendance
Bill and Hillary knew what they were doing too!
To: chachacha
Makes me sick to my stomach. Do the executives who live in their gated communities think they are safe from a Chinese nuclear attack? Morons.
To: Indy Pendance
The Fines will probably come out of the stockholders pockets.
Fines should not have been assessed. Only Long Jail terms or a firing squad for treason.
5
posted on
03/08/2003 9:30:30 AM PST
by
chainsaw
To: Indy Pendance
To: SMEDLEYBUTLER; Admin Moderator
I wish this search function worked better. Thanks.
7
posted on
03/08/2003 9:41:59 AM PST
by
Indy Pendance
(You can't say we didn't give you a fair warning.)
To: FL_engineer
must that dead carcass be dragged into every thread??!?!?!
To: chachacha
What I want to know, is who is going to prison.
9
posted on
03/08/2003 9:53:38 AM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(Are you going Freeps Ahoy! Don't miss the boat. Er ship...)
To: Eowyn-of-Rohan
Bill Clinton's largest single contributor was Bernard Schwartz of Loral. Loral gave a number of secret technologies to China. Yep, that dead carcas should be dragged into every thread until every citizen in the United States is aware of it.
10
posted on
03/08/2003 9:55:20 AM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(Are you going Freeps Ahoy! Don't miss the boat. Er ship...)
Comment #11 Removed by Moderator
To: jbind
I just wish they could get to the bottom of every big campaign contribution ever made... plenty of wickedness to go around, and neither party is innocent
To: deport; Howlin; Texasforever
$52 million in fines.
The "Bush ain't doing nothing about Loral" crowd is strangely quiet (or did they get banned?).
But of course, as you can see, this isn't enough either.
If Dubya had the execs all executed, these people would complain that their families were allowed to live.
13
posted on
03/08/2003 10:09:48 AM PST
by
Luis Gonzalez
(The Ever So Humble Banana Republican)
To: Indy Pendance
Sounds like pro forma slaps on the wrist.
How much HUNDREDS millions of dollars in profits were made.
And the Exec's skate on their traitorous, treasonous behavior.
No Treason trials eh, GetOutofJail free cards for those privileged scions of the corporate class.
To: Luis Gonzalez
So espionage is committed in the abstract, and no one is responsible. How convenient.
15
posted on
03/08/2003 10:22:45 AM PST
by
onedoug
To: Indy Pendance
To: onedoug
So espionage is committed in the abstract.
Prove espionage.
17
posted on
03/08/2003 11:22:08 AM PST
by
Luis Gonzalez
(The Ever So Humble Banana Republican)
To: Luis Gonzalez
Security sensitive/privledged military technology sold to a foreign government for a monetary or political quid pro quo.... I'd rather be prosecutor than defendant.
If you or I had done it, where do you think we'd be now?
18
posted on
03/08/2003 12:17:40 PM PST
by
onedoug
To: chachacha
[Loral agreed to pay $20 million in fines, but neither admitted nor denied wrongdoing. ]
Make hundreds of millions in profits, pay $20 million fine. No brainer for a traitorous group of slugs. No matter. After the "Great War", they will be held accountable.
To: onedoug
Amongst a large block of sanctioned trade products, an individual in Loral sold some technology that was not cleared by the US government to be sold to the Chinese. He did it in an effort to rectify problems that were being encountered by technology that had already been sold to the Chicom by them beforehand.
There was no subterfuge, no attempt at deceit, and it was done above the board.
What was done was in accordance to the law, they were fined.
Had it been us, we would have been fined as well because that's what the proscribed penalty is for selling technology lacking proper approval from the Feds.
It was a violation of trade procedures with an unfortunate end result.
There was no espionage involved.
20
posted on
03/08/2003 9:48:21 PM PST
by
Luis Gonzalez
(The Ever So Humble Banana Republican)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson