Skip to comments.
Probe sought of French parts sales
Washington Times ^
| 3/08/03
| Bill Gertz
Posted on 03/07/2003 11:14:39 PM PST by kattracks
Edited on 07/12/2004 4:01:20 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
The U.S. government should investigate reports that France allowed Iraq to obtain military equipment in violation of U.N. sanctions, a senior Republican senator said yesterday.
"There is no need for France to sell equipment to Saddam Hussein," said Sen. Ted Stevens of Alaska. "It is international treason. ... It is in violation of a U.N. resolution, and there should be no question
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: nwo; rinowatch; sovereigntylist; unlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
To: Kay Soze
NO MORE WMDs FOR OIL Nice, can I borrow that slogan?
21
posted on
03/08/2003 5:15:54 AM PST
by
steveegg
(12 years of inspections + 0 compliance = no peace ... 200,000 troops + 1 W = peace + liberation)
To: auboy
Just call all of them what they are; the Axis of Weavil.
22
posted on
03/08/2003 5:17:34 AM PST
by
steveegg
(12 years of inspections + 0 compliance = no peace ... 200,000 troops + 1 W = peace + liberation)
To: EGPWS
France should be censured in the U.N
The UN should be censured. I watched Scarborough last night and boy did I get mad. He said think about it :
We have terrorist and communist countries with seats in the UN. We, the US gets kicked off the human rights commision and Syria-SYRIA, gets our seat! And China has VETO power, what the hell are we doing in the UN people?!
To: seamole
And Mr. Stevens (I now refuse to call him Sen.) has plainly violated his oath to the ConstitutionThat statement is is the objectionable one. It has NOTHING to do with France's response. Where do you "see" anything that can be construed to be a violation of our Constitution in the article?
In response to your question - I AM a conservative Republican as opposed to your disruptor status.
24
posted on
03/08/2003 5:36:52 AM PST
by
zip
(I love being right)
To: RepublicanArmy
Correction, his name is ChIraq.
25
posted on
03/08/2003 5:37:58 AM PST
by
Grampa Dave
(Stamp out Freepathons! Stop being a Freep Loader! Become a monthly donor!)
To: Kay Soze
This is great: NO MORE WMDs FOR OIL!
26
posted on
03/08/2003 5:40:49 AM PST
by
Grampa Dave
(Stamp out Freepathons! Stop being a Freep Loader! Become a monthly donor!)
To: kattracks
If true, it's time to impose sanctions on France. They are merchants of death, selling to every SS-Islamofacsist regime they can so that Jews and Americans can be murdered. The French are the arsenal of Islamofascism and should be treated as such.
27
posted on
03/08/2003 5:57:45 AM PST
by
tomahawk
To: dmeara
All the more reason to make it irrelevant by killing it.
28
posted on
03/08/2003 7:24:02 AM PST
by
expatpat
To: EGPWS
"I believe the American people need to know more about this. We need to know why two ... among the best of our allies [are] standing on the sidelines as we prepare to try and destroy this regime that threatens the world," he said.
This contains what I consider another misstatement. They are NOT standing on the sidelines, they are actively running interference for Saddam.
29
posted on
03/08/2003 7:39:02 AM PST
by
Cap Huff
To: kattracks
This is the tip of the iceberg. The only people on earth who are TRULY willing to trade blood for oil, is the French. They have huge oil and defense contracts with Iraq, and they are more than willing to trade Iraqi blood to keep those contracts.
To: MJY1288
Without our money, the UN wouldn't last a week. They can't even afford to have a circle jerk without us.
To: steveegg
the Axis of WeavilVery good!
32
posted on
03/08/2003 8:46:32 AM PST
by
auboy
To: kattracks
This story quotes only Republican lawmakers. Didn't any Democrats also protest what the French may have done here? Or have the Democrats essentially become the French?
33
posted on
03/08/2003 8:52:09 AM PST
by
kesg
To: EGPWS
Getm real......
America, the land of Clinton who always acted in a legal manner, has no right to complain to France when the French company acted in a legal manner by selling to a legitimate company who sold to another who sold to Iraq.
A country who condones the lies of it's own President who raises a legal defense for every action of his whole administration and that worships his wife and elects her to high office, has no right to complain about a few spare parts.
Indict and try Bill Clinton and then your complaints will have some validity.
34
posted on
03/08/2003 8:55:17 AM PST
by
bert
(Don't Panic !)
To: kattracks
I hate French parts.
I'm rather in favor of Italian parts. Witness Sophia Loren, for example.
35
posted on
03/08/2003 9:13:06 AM PST
by
Lazamataz
(I have learned, over the years, to NEVER assume ANYTHING..)
To: steveegg
Yes- the No Oil for WMDS - it belongs to all freepers you may all use it to your hearts delight
36
posted on
03/08/2003 9:21:15 AM PST
by
Kay Soze
(F - France and Germany - They are my Nation's and my Family's enemies.)
To: Kay Soze
Why do we still keep calling the French and Germans our "allies"? Words mean things. These two countries have not acted as our allies for a long, long time. This is nothing new. It's about time to call a spade a spade.
To: Grampa Dave
LOL good call!!!!!!!!!!
To: kattracks
Once "Ken Star" takes a look at this
me thinks he will find a white spot
on France's blue dress......
39
posted on
03/08/2003 11:52:34 AM PST
by
TRY ONE
(")
Comment #40 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson