Skip to comments.
Iraqi drone 'could drop chemicals on troops'
The London Times ^
| March 8, 2003
| James Bone
Posted on 03/07/2003 5:59:08 PM PST by BurbankKarl
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
To: BurbankKarl
I thought that Iraq was disarming?
The sky is falling again.
Does the UN know?
2
posted on
03/07/2003 6:01:46 PM PST
by
ladyinred
To: *war_list; Ernest_at_the_Beach
To: BurbankKarl
Iraq doesn't have any chemical weapons. Tom Daschle said so.
4
posted on
03/07/2003 6:04:18 PM PST
by
js1138
To: ladyinred
Blix is an ass. Sorry, I don't mean to insult donkeys.
5
posted on
03/07/2003 6:06:28 PM PST
by
fatidic
To: fatidic
I can't even begin to understand how Blix can give the report that he did today knowing what was in this report.
To: js1138
Glad no Republicans listen to Dasshole, or we probably be under Chinese rulership....LOL
To: BurbankKarl
Anybody know the overall effectiveness of gas under actual combat conditions?Based upon WWI experience gas does not seem to be the most effective of weapons. In all of WWI only about 20,000 casualties 5,000 deaths(from memory. Wind conditions as to velocity and direction, rain,airborne dust etc. all effect the use of gas.
8
posted on
03/07/2003 6:13:50 PM PST
by
AEMILIUS PAULUS
(Further, the statement assumed)
Comment #9 Removed by Moderator
To: BurbankKarl
James Bone? Not James Bond?
To: BurbankKarl
Is that one of the drones commonly available from the Acme Company?
11
posted on
03/07/2003 6:18:17 PM PST
by
TC Rider
(The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
To: Jorge
Saddam Hussein has already taken care of it...many times.
12
posted on
03/07/2003 6:18:22 PM PST
by
IVAXMAN
To: HiTech RedNeck
The name's Bone, James Bone. (aka Spooky)
13
posted on
03/07/2003 6:21:34 PM PST
by
TC Rider
(The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
To: BurbankKarl
**The omission raised serious questions about Dr Blix’s objectivity.**
This omission and about 75 others.
Prairie
14
posted on
03/07/2003 6:21:58 PM PST
by
prairiebreeze
(One, two, three, dip, two, three. No Blixie, we've decided we don't want to dance with you anymore!)
To: TC Rider
In that case we have no worry. It only works on wily coyotes.
To: RummyChick
Blix knows. He just has interests that lie elsewhere. His pocketbook to be exact.
He's being bought and the US and UK are being sold down the river.
Prairie
16
posted on
03/07/2003 6:23:32 PM PST
by
prairiebreeze
(One, two, three, dip, two, three. No Blixie, we've decided we don't want to dance with you anymore!)
To: BurbankKarl
To: BurbankKarl
So how is a UN Inspector held accountable for lying?
To: Jorge
So? Is this a reason for Bush to kill Iraqi babies? Oh look ... a troll.
19
posted on
03/07/2003 6:27:45 PM PST
by
Centurion2000
(Take charge of your destiny, or someone else will)
To: Jorge
So? Is this a reason for Bush to kill Iraqi babies? No, it is Saddam that will kill the Iraqi babies with this. Just watch. He will use it on his own people and then try to blame us.
And, he will send it to Israel and try to wipe out farms and such with them.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
