But we are only on the threshold of high-tech warfare. Most of the military is actually still low-tech. It is?
1 posted on
03/05/2003 1:04:04 PM PST by
w_over_w
To: stumpy; timydnuc; My2Cents; wideawake; Congressman Billybob; Destructor; MissAmericanPie; ...
Military ping!
2 posted on
03/05/2003 1:04:40 PM PST by
w_over_w
(Standing Athwart History 24/7)
To: w_over_w
The HPM or High Powered Microwave releases two billion watts of destructive electric energy, as much as the Hoover Dam generates in 24 hours. Somebody needs to learn the difference between energy and power.
4 posted on
03/05/2003 1:28:41 PM PST by
Physicist
To: w_over_w
The world was impressed by the advanced weapons we used in Desert Storm...and we are far beyond that technology now.
5 posted on
03/05/2003 1:29:24 PM PST by
Jorge
To: w_over_w
The American military has made a quantum leap in technology and firepower since then.Hey, so has China! What a coincidence!
7 posted on
03/05/2003 1:34:13 PM PST by
Captainpaintball
(Me Chinese, Me play joke...We steal from you 'till you go broke!!!)
To: w_over_w
Given our 1st choice to save innocent lives and therefore, use the "microwave weapon" to disarm their technology and communications networks, doesn't that mean that eventually you're talking "house to house" combat?
The irony, huh?
8 posted on
03/05/2003 1:35:06 PM PST by
DCPatriot
To: w_over_w
Yes. Look at it this way: The JDAM means a squad can "carry" dozens of 200-15,000# HE bombs into battle with at least the same precision of mortars and artillery.
That means a rethink of, among other things, mobile howitzers, ground-toground missiles, etc. since the planes carrying the JDAMs fly anywhere in any weather.
And that means a rethink of the whole traditional infantry/armor/supply-chain thing.
We have sent 300,000 soldiers to the area around Iraq. Only a maximum of 30,000 (maybe much less) can fight this new way. Maybe we need something like a really large drone bomber to loiter over an army? Who knows! Things are changing faster than we can adapt every part, or even most parts of the military.
9 posted on
03/05/2003 1:36:38 PM PST by
eno_
To: w_over_w
It is? Relative to the possibilities, yes.
11 posted on
03/05/2003 1:38:16 PM PST by
TADSLOS
(Gunner, Target!)
To: w_over_w
Some U.S. Forces in Iraq may experiment with miniature planes. Military analyst David Isby explained, "And by miniature, we mean about a three foot wingspan, one which a soldier can carry in pieces in a backpack. You assemble this and control it by a radio link attached to the laptop. You can send this thing off and it will have a little video cam that will stream data back to your laptop." Then you put a little anti-tank charge on it, and some picture matching software, and let it drive itself into a tank. Fly and forget.
Pretty soon, war will look like "The Birds", but with lots of little explosions.
13 posted on
03/05/2003 3:26:17 PM PST by
Uncle Miltie
(Peace is Good, Freedom is Better!)
To: w_over_w
Yes it is, radios that weigh 35lbs with very little range and take batteries the size of a egg carton. GPS units (pluggers) that are 3 times the size of a civilian unit and take special non-standard size batteries. While countries around the world are devoloping specialized scout vehicles, the US Army sends its scouts out in lightly armed and armored Humvees. Most GI's end up buying their own field stoves, gloves, GPS units and small Motorola handheld radios because the military issue stuff either doesn't exist, or doesn't work.
20 posted on
03/05/2003 5:30:03 PM PST by
Tailback
To: w_over_w
bttt
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson