Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Environmetalists Say Bush Waging 'Assault' on Public Lands
CNSNews.com ^ | 03-03-2003 | Marc Morano

Posted on 03/04/2003 7:58:41 AM PST by countrydummy

(CNSNews.com) - Environmental groups and conservationists say the Bush administration has launched an "assault" on the nation's public lands.

"We are simply witnessing the most sweeping attempt to weaken or eliminate environmental protections for these lands in the history of modern environmental policy," said Marty Hayden, legislative director for Earth Justice at a recent Washington press conference. A coalition of green groups participated in a briefing titled "Full Scope of Bush Assaults on U.S. Public Lands."

Hayden said the Bush administration's land use policy seems to be: "leave no forest behind" and "leave no oil and gas well un-drilled."

But a property rights group fired back at the environmentalists saying they should take responsibility for any loss of forests.

Chuck Cushman, the executive director of the American Land Rights Association, (ALRA) told CNSNews.com, "The environmental groups already left no forest behind, they set all the forests up to burn, they locked them up and locked the people out and wouldn't let the professional managers take care of them."

"The legacy of these guys is burning our national forests," Cushman added.

The environmental groups alleged that "anti conservation interests" are now in charge at the White House.

Craig Obey, vice president for government affairs at the National Parks and Conservation Association said, "Decision after decision by this administration is putting parks at risk, along with other public lands and we feel the need to raise the alarm."

Mike Leahy, the natural resource council for the Defenders of Wildlife, believes that since the end of the Clinton administration, there has been a "systematic dismantling" of regulations that protect national forests and public lands.

"They are going back and trying to reverse about 20-25 years of forest policy and fundamentally redoing how public forests in this country are managed," Leahy explained.

Another participant also drew a negative comparison between Bush's policies and those of President Ronald Reagan.

"I hope we are not getting to a point with the Bush administration here that we are going to be looking fondly at the Reagan administration for their environmental initiatives, but that seems to be the direction we are heading," said David Alberswerth of the Wilderness Society. Alberswerth worked at the Department of Interior during the Clinton administration.

The Bush administration also received low marks from the environmentalists for allowing the continued use of snowmobiles in Yellowstone National Park.

"Yellowstone should be preserved for present and future generations, not used as a thrill ride for this generation and destroyed for the next," Obey said.

But Cushman dismissed the environmentalists' snowmobile concerns, saying, "they never saw a snowmobile they didn't' hate."

"Yellowstone is two million acres and there are so few snowmobiles, and they are so limited in where they go, and they are virtually almost all on roads," Cushman noted.

'Too Many Oil and Gas Resources'

Alberswerth chastised the administration for focusing on the search for domestic sources of oil and gas reserves.

"The question instead should be - Are too many oil and gas resources available for development?" Alberswerth asked.

"In this rush to develop all this oil and gas on the public lands in the West, have we adequately protected the scenic, ecological, environmental, air and water resource values out there?" Alberswerth asked.

Cushman believes the green groups would prefer the U.S. to rely on foreign sources of oil.

"I guess when it comes to meeting with the oil and gas-rich nations of the Middle East, they are in favor of our dependence there and having less resources here," Cushman said.

'Just Whining'

Cushman believes the greens "are just whining now because their guy (Democrat Al Gore) didn't get elected."

"The government already owns 40 percent of the land. These people are in the business --and they are a green business -- they are in the business of land grabbing. During the Clinton administration, they grabbed huge amounts of lands," Cushman said.

Cushman dismissed what he called alarmist rhetoric over national parkland disappearing.

"Does anyone keep track of how many times these guys say the sky is falling?" he asked.

Cushman believes the opposition of environmental groups to the recreational use of national parklands is part of "a cultural war" in which the green activists refuse to see "people as legitimate participants" in the natural world.

"If we listen to these guys we are going to burn our forests, lock up our public lands, force people to live in cities in high densities and zone low to medium-income families from ever owning a home and a part of the American dream," Cushman said.


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Front Page News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: government; landgrabs; ngos
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
I listened to this press conference and I agree totally with Chuck! Also, my hole generalization of the conference, was a basic, "Stop all further development of all lands, those already in 'public' ownership and provide more funds to strip rural landowners from ownership, as well as to NOT allow local governments the right to make decisions on land use!!!!!!!!
1 posted on 03/04/2003 7:58:41 AM PST by countrydummy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: farmfriend; sauropod; AAABEST
ping!
2 posted on 03/04/2003 8:00:35 AM PST by countrydummy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly; AuntB; Grampa Dave; Jeff Head
ping
3 posted on 03/04/2003 8:02:07 AM PST by countrydummy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: countrydummy
Thanks for posting this.

This can't be happening. There is no difference between GW and the Goron! :)
4 posted on 03/04/2003 8:04:30 AM PST by Grampa Dave (Stamp out Freepathons! Stop being a Freep Loader! Become a monthly donor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: countrydummy
I can tell what environment groups are going to say without reading....

wolf wolf wolf....wolf wolf wolf...evil republicans...wolf wolf wolf.

snore.
5 posted on 03/04/2003 8:05:02 AM PST by Keith (One way or another, Saddam is toast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holyscroller; Carry_Okie; SierraWasp; Alamo-Girl
ping!
6 posted on 03/04/2003 8:09:42 AM PST by countrydummy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keith
Is it not pitiful? See the underlining to "how good the Clinton Administration" was? Ugh......
7 posted on 03/04/2003 8:18:08 AM PST by countrydummy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
Again, note the underlying "How 'good' the Clinton Administration was" bunch of junk"!

Like I said in my comments, the whole thing was geared to strip landowners of their lands, and local governments form having any say so in their states and communites....I wish I knew how to find a full transcript of the whole press conference, anyone got any ideas?

8 posted on 03/04/2003 8:24:29 AM PST by countrydummy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: countrydummy
Jeepers! Thanks for the heads up!
9 posted on 03/04/2003 8:33:57 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: countrydummy
This thread appeared yesterday. Hunt it down for accurate, savage, and caustic comments by Nucluside! Regards
10 posted on 03/04/2003 8:44:24 AM PST by Nucluside (Maine NEA libs don't get prosecuted for child abuse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl; Grampa Dave; sauropod
You are wc Alamo-Girl! Can you believe all of this junk? First, the more money these groups get to take---no steal--land from rural landowners, the happier they are of course, but then again these groups promise increased recreation thus increased economic growth for the areas...but the very first thing that always happens is the decrease in recreation opportunites! Thus the local economies lose income, and tax base! Thus the LIES! of such groups! The local economies fail, the landowners lose, the tax bases go to H*** and the rest of the landowners not yet affected---their taxes go threw the roof! School bond levies have to be passed to continue to provide our children with the equipment they need.....what a destructive vicious cycle!!!!!!
11 posted on 03/04/2003 8:49:13 AM PST by countrydummy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Nucluside
Oh Dear! I should of known! :-) Can you send me the link? Thanks in advance!!!!!
12 posted on 03/04/2003 8:54:04 AM PST by countrydummy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: countrydummy
Trees are people too!!
13 posted on 03/04/2003 9:13:01 AM PST by Only1choice____Freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: countrydummy
The Bush administration also received low marks from the environmentalists for allowing the continued use of snowmobiles in Yellowstone National Park.

I hope environmetlalists find more issues to give Bush more low marks.

14 posted on 03/04/2003 9:20:34 AM PST by TonyWojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Only1choice____Freedom
I am totally assuming that this was a joke! :-) Course we all know the dangers of assuming anything! LOL LOL
15 posted on 03/04/2003 9:21:36 AM PST by countrydummy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: countrydummy
IMHO, it has nothing to do with environment and everything to do with power, i.e. wealth and control. These groups, and everyone they've managed to get hired into the system, align themselves hard with left-wing ideology and the Democrats. It reminds me a lot of the hypocritical rationale of feminists.
16 posted on 03/04/2003 9:21:54 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl
I so agree! Yet it also has everyting to do with promoting and agenda that will take lands from those that are the best stewards of the lands and that is the individual landowner! People like me that work hard to clean up my environment and have done a dang good job doing it, and now these nuts wants to take it from me and my family because we have in the name of "preservation"! Makes me sick! I would love to show how the lands of the landowners along the New River's boundries owned by individual land owners looks compared to the properties that the NPS owns! I will tell you this, it is most shameful what the NPS has done!!! A virtuall trash dump!!!
17 posted on 03/04/2003 9:31:21 AM PST by countrydummy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl
I am now told that this post was posted yesterday, I am sorry, I did not know that, can you fix it? I am not a moderator, and I am sorry, I did a search, but did not find it....can you add these posts or a link to the original post by Nucluside or yoe?
18 posted on 03/04/2003 9:36:11 AM PST by countrydummy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: countrydummy; Admin Moderator
I just posted a link to this thread from the previous one. I'm not sure whether it will do any good, i.e. whether the moderator will delete this thread, lock it or what.
19 posted on 03/04/2003 9:45:20 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl
thank you, I don't want to take anything from anybody! You are so nice!
20 posted on 03/04/2003 10:05:07 AM PST by countrydummy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson