Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cementing a Case?
KGO7.com ^ | Feb 27 2003 | KGO

Posted on 03/01/2003 7:57:53 AM PST by runningbear

Cementing a Case?

Cementing A Case?

Police Study Cement Traces On Scott Peterson's Boat

The man who sold Scott Peterson the boat the Modesto, Calif., man says he went fishing in the day his pregnant wife disappeared, said he found traces of cement on the vessel that weren't there when he sold it.

Feb. 27 — Police are looking at whether traces of cement found on Scott Peterson's boat and three containers of cement at his Modesto home could be related to the disappearance of his pregnant wife, Laci.

Investigators carried out a two-day search of the Petersons' home last week in what they said was an effort to "eliminate or connect" him as a suspect in the case.

One of the things they found in that search were containers of cement, which he said were for the people who were working on his pool. When police asked the pool workers, though, they said the cement was not theirs.

Police asked the man who sold Peterson the boat he said he was fishing on the day that his wife disappeared to look it over and see if anything was different about it. He said that he saw traces of cement on the boat that were not there when he turned the boat over to Peterson.

"I know it wasn't that way when I sold it to him," the man, Bruce Peterson, who is not related to Scott Peterson, told ABCNEWS affiliate KGO in San Francisco. "I don't know what he used it for, if he was hauling stuff or anything."

The 14-foot aluminum boat is a 1991 Sears Gamefisher, equipped with a 15-horsepower Gamefisher outboard motor. Police seized the boat, its trailer, and a 2002 Ford F-150 pickup truck shortly after Laci Peterson disappeared.

Peterson bought the boat a few weeks before his wife disappeared on Dec. 24. He said he last saw his wife at 9:30 a.m. on Christmas Eve when he left to go fishing on the boat.

Since Laci Peterson disappeared, police have searched the San Francisco Bay near Berkeley, where Scott Peterson said he was fishing. They have also combed virtually every waterway in Stanislaus County, and portions of Merced, Calaveras, San Joaquin, Tuolumne and Mariposa counties, but found nothing in any of the searches.

And to go along with the story line:

Peterson's mother replies to comment

Peterson's mother replies to comment

By PATRICK GIBLIN
BEE STAFF WRITER

Published 12:55 p.m. PST Friday, February 28, 2003 Jackie Peterson said Thursday it's not surprising that a man found concrete dust in the bottom of her son Scott Peterson's boat.

The residue was likely there because of the boat's concrete anchor, she said. "It was mentioned long ago that Scott had a cement anchor."

Scott Peterson's wife, Laci Peterson, was reported missing Dec. 24. Scott Peterson told police he last saw her at 9:30 a.m. as he left with the boat to go fishing in the Bay Area and she prepared to walk their dog in East La Loma Park.

Jackie Peterson was responding to comments made by Bruce Peterson during a television interview. He sold the boat to Scott Peterson in December. They are not related.

Detectives asked Bruce Peterson to look at the boat after police seized it.

Since Laci Peterson's disappearance, hundreds of officers and volunteers have searched from Tuolumne County to the Berkeley Marina for the missing pregnant woman.

On Wednesday, Vivian Mitchell reported that she saw Laci Peterson walking her dog between 10 a.m. and 10:15 a.m. Dec. 24. She said she reported that to police but never received a return call.

Lee Peterson, Scott Peterson's father, reacted to that story Thursday.

"How do you follow up on a lead if you don't return someone's calls?" Peterson said by phone Thursday. "It makes me wonder about their competency. Here's an eyewitness account of my daughter-in-law and they don't follow up on it."

Police spokesman Doug Ridenour on Thursday confirmed that the department received the tip and said "it was appropriately handled during our investigation.

"But we have 8,000 tips," he said, "and the majority we haven't called back."

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

And one other just to set off on this Saturday of news:


this image also includes on the webpage a video
Click the URL for the video clip

Nobody Ever Followed Up’

Neighbors Say Police Ignored Sightings of Laci Peterson

M O D E S T O , Calif., Feb. 28 — Neighbors of Laci Peterson say the Modesto Police Department ignored their report of a Laci Peterson sighting the day she went missing.

Vivian Mitchell, 78, says she and her husband, Bill, were the last people to see Laci Peterson, but she says Modesto police haven't talked to her about their Christmas Eve sighting.

"I called and told them that I'd seen whom I thought was her and it would be pretty difficult to have an identical twin and identical dog," Mitchell told ABCNEWS affiliate KGO in San Francisco. "I did think that it was strange they didn't call. I just thought they had some information that over-rode what I had seen and I just thought it was strange that nobody ever followed up," she said.

Mitchell says it took her a week to call the police, because she assumed others in the neighborhood had also seen Peterson walking her dog.

Mitchell says she remembers seeing Peterson, who was eight months pregnant at the time, between 10 a.m. and 10:15 a.m. on Dec. 24. That's about 45 minutes after Scott Peterson told police he said goodbye to his wife and went fishing.

‘It Was Frustrating’

"It was frustrating when the [local] paper went on and on and they kept on reporting that 9:30 a.m. was the last anybody had seen of her," Mitchell said. "I am pretty well convinced it was her because it was just too close circumstance to be not her. What she looked like, the dog, the time element, the whole thing," Mitchell said.

Mitchell's report prompted frustration from the family of Laci's husband Scott Peterson. His sister-in-law, Janey Peterson, says she doesn't understand why Modesto police haven't focused more on reported sightings and tips.

"When this all started, there was many reports of people who had said they seen her walking," Janey Peterson told ABCNEWS' Good Morning America. "That's why all the posters say 'Last seen walking her dog' in that area. As time went on, it became, 'well, we cannot confirm that she had been walking her dog.' Then it became, you know, 'we believe she left the area in a vehicle,'" Janey Peterson said.

In the wake of Mitchell's claims, Scott Peterson's father, Lee, on Thursday criticized police for focusing suspicion on his son .

"How do you follow up on a lead if you don't return someone's calls?" Peterson said in a Thursday telephone call to The Associated Press from Solana Beach in San Diego County.

"It makes me wonder about their competency," he said of Modesto Police. "Here's an eyewitness account of my daughter-in-law and they don't follow up on it."

Police: ‘We Have 8,000 Tips’

Modesto Police spokesman Doug Ridenour declined comment on Lee Peterson's remarks to the AP. He confirmed that the department received the tip, and said the tip was appropriately handled. "But we have 8,000 tips," he said, "and the majority we haven't called back."

The Modesto Police Department declined a request to appear on Good Morning America, saying it's an ongoing investigation.

Mitchell said she talked to a woman when she called the Modesto police. She says the woman asked for her name, address and phone number.

The Mitchells live about 10 blocks from the home that Laci Peterson, 27, and her huband shared.

Scott Peterson, 30, told police he last saw his wife at about 9:30 a.m., before he left for the Berkeley Marina. Police still say that Peterson is not a suspect in his wife's disappearance, but he hasn't been ruled out either.

Police Search Turns Up Cement

Police removed 95 items from Scott Peterson's home during a two-day search last week. One of the things they found in that search were containers of cement, which he said were for the people who were working on his pool. When police asked the pool workers, though, they said the cement was not theirs.

Police contacted the man who sold Peterson the boat he said he was fishing on the day his wife disappeared, asking the seller to look it over and see if anything was different about it. He said that he saw traces of cement on the boat that were not there when he turned the boat over to Peterson.

"I know it wasn't that way when I sold it to him," the man, Bruce Peterson, who is not related to Scott Peterson, told ABCNEWS affiliate KGO in San Francisco. "I don't know what he used it for, if he was hauling stuff or anything."

When asked about the cement, Janey Peterson said Scott and Laci spent a lot of time on home improvement. "I know they've done a lot of work on their home," she said.

Janey Peterson says her family is waiting for a call from the Modesto Police Chief on the Mitchell sighting.

ABCNEWS affiliate KGO in San Francisco and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

(Excerpt) Read more at abclocal.go.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: lacipeterson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-242 next last
To: MaggieMay
Bet he catches it for opening his mouth about the football game. ; )
221 posted on 03/02/2003 10:28:41 AM PST by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
Thanks, you are correct, that's what I get for being up way too late.
222 posted on 03/02/2003 11:10:37 AM PST by Rusty Roberts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7; L84AD8; RGSpincich
. Amber met 31 year old Scott on a blind date on Nov.20th at the World Sports Cafe bar in Fresno. Scott and Amber were introduced by a girl who knew him from work, the girl thought that he was single, according to Ron Frey. Does this seem strange to anyone but me? He never mentioned his wife at work? What about insurance forms? Never spoke of becoming a dad? Lacie never called him there and said "tell him his wife called"?

What kind of man never tells anyone he is going to be a dad?

I agree with you. It makes sense that the girl worked at the gym (where Amber worked as a massage therapist).Men and women will often not wear rings whilst working out (not comfortable when lifting weights).

Or perhaps he was getting a massage by this woman at the gym, another time where you take off all your jewelry. Perhaps she was married or "taken" but was impressed with scott and introduced him to her co-worker. It has been my experience that whilst getting a massage you will often have a conversation...similar to getting a hair cut. I can just see scott trying to appear single in his conversation. There is no better way to eliminate single females from your life than by saying you are married with a baby on the way...the other is that you served time for murder of your unborn child and wife...

(Hi L8 good to see you on the board again)

223 posted on 03/02/2003 11:38:56 AM PST by Queen Jadis (SP Bumper sitcker "Trade Corp, ask me about my line of S--- I've been delivering")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: MaggieMay
yeah...it's only been 2 years off hen pecking too!
224 posted on 03/02/2003 11:54:38 AM PST by Queen Jadis (SP Bumper sitcker "Trade Corp, ask me about my line of S--- I've been delivering")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: texasbluebell
He needs to go on the computer to learn how to make cement anchors?? This is a guy who, according to his father-in-law, Ron, was handy around the house?

I could make cement anchors, and I don't even own a boat, nor had I ever even heard of cement anchors till I was reading about this case! Let's see...duh...you mix the cement, pour it in a bucket or other container, and when it begins to set but isn't totally hardened, you stick your metal hook in the middle. When it's totally hardened you cut off the bucket, if you so desire.

Not rocket science. Why would he bother going online about such an obvious thing? Unless he wanted to bolster the story he was planning on telling by leaving a computer trail?
225 posted on 03/02/2003 6:57:58 PM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
Sure--if you lost an anchor, probably that means you lost it while it was in the water.

But we have never heard that Scott had ever taken his (to him) new boat out before Dec. 24. So he lost the anchors on dry land? Hmmm... lost three big heavy unwieldy masses of cement. O-kay!
226 posted on 03/02/2003 7:00:36 PM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
I can understand that it might not be unusual for a beginner to lose anchors. But if he'd never even taken the boat out before 12/24, it would be unusual for him to have already lost three anchors--while on dry land. And we have never heard once that he ever took the boat out before 12/24. (In fact, it's not certain that he took it out even then!)

Also, I'm not sure he's a beginner. The family says he has been fishing all his life.
227 posted on 03/02/2003 7:10:30 PM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich
Good thoughts. Also, how much you wanna bet that when they sold that restaurant/bar, they vowed to cut back on social drinking? It's pretty easy to just pour a hard drink or two every evening, when you own the whole bar. But it's a bad habit to get into.

Remember, we've seen a few pictures of the two of them in which Scott looked somewhat "hammered," as KneelBeforeZod accurately commented.
228 posted on 03/02/2003 7:14:06 PM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: TexKat
Now you made me think of something ultra-simple that the police could have (and almost surely have) checked. A fishing license. Did Scott have a current fishing license when police talked to him on 12/24?

We all know these can be bought at the bait store. Oh... whoops, aw shucks--we never heard that he ever WENT to a bait store, did we?
229 posted on 03/02/2003 8:08:53 PM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: WellsFargo94
LOL!! Yeah, they'd probably get a good laugh out of it. Except if you happen to be in Saudi Arabia and are caught with some picture like that, I think they shoot you on sight or something! Yet another reason to love our friends the Saudis.
230 posted on 03/02/2003 8:12:19 PM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
In order for SP to fish at Brooks Island, he needed California fishing license and the $4.00 fishing fee.
231 posted on 03/02/2003 8:25:07 PM PST by TexKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
Don't forget this five anchor story came from the NE. I wouldn't put much stock in any information they put out.
232 posted on 03/02/2003 8:33:06 PM PST by I. Ben Hurt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: TexKat
I thought so! The $4.00 fee is a little something extra, but a fishing license is pretty standard equipment, always. Well then, of course it shouldn't be any problem for him to produce it, now, should it? Maybe he kept it next to his Super Bowl key card.
233 posted on 03/02/2003 8:33:40 PM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
I went fishing on the Columbia River for sturgeon and used lures, fancy flashing ones, but lures. Wonder if they've checked Scott's tackle box. I did have to have a fishing license.
234 posted on 03/02/2003 8:40:20 PM PST by I. Ben Hurt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
By the way, what is a SuperBowl keycard?
235 posted on 03/02/2003 8:43:30 PM PST by TexKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: TexKat
In order for SP to fish at Brooks Island, he needed California fishing license and the $4.00 fishing fee.

Legally, that is. Assuming for the moment that the rules meant something to him. Kind of hard to imagine that all things considered. Is that $4. fee for Brooks Island applicable if you float around the perimeter of the island? They wouldn't have got it either way, isn't there a "Help wanted" sign there?

While we are talking about the rules and state laws. Also need to consider if he registered the boat trailer into his name from the other Mr. Peterson. Or does that name thing somehow work into his plan?

236 posted on 03/02/2003 8:50:26 PM PST by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: I. Ben Hurt
fishing on the Columbia River for sturgeon and used lures

Fishing for sturgeon in the Bay is different. It's been described as a bait and wait proposition. SP cited a magazine article that piqued his interest in the SF Bay sturgeon fishing, I am sure it was specific as to the best bait to use. I remember reading that there is a variety of fresh bait that can be used. He should have had some signs of that bait being in his possesion on 12/24 to make his alibi believable.

237 posted on 03/02/2003 9:21:38 PM PST by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich
Ooh, good idea about the name thing! Causes confusion, doesn't it? Just what one might want if he were doing something shady--"he came back the following day and bought it on the spot, for cash."

Correct me if I'm wrong, but CA seems to be a somewhat over-regulated state. Now, even in the states with far less rules and regulations, everyone knows you need fishing or hunting licenses, or you face fines and court appearances. And so they make it easy to get them--you can buy one at the bait store or where you get your shells for hunting, and you can buy it on the day you go to fish or hunt. There's little excuse for not carrying one. So--where's Scott's?
238 posted on 03/03/2003 5:01:28 AM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: TexKat
I don't know, but I know someone who almost surely can tell me, and I'll ask him when I see him next.

As others here have said, I am guessing that it confers some VIP status on the person who holds it, perhaps allowing them in areas where the general public can't go. It is no doubt one of those things companies give out for PR purposes, to impress customers, etc. It's said Scott got his from ABC. (Hmmm--what if that's true, and the other media look down on the NE for paying for stories? As if they themselves didn't also have little ways of getting "exclusives"?)
239 posted on 03/03/2003 5:04:24 AM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
There's little excuse for not carrying one. So--where's Scott's?

He may have one. If he went fishing anytime in 2002 he could have picked one up that would have been valid on 12/24.

240 posted on 03/03/2003 7:40:37 AM PST by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-242 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson