Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Japan: Hawks coming out of the woodwork
Asia Times | 2/26/03 | Axel Berkofsky

Posted on 02/25/2003 10:26:51 AM PST by Enemy Of The State

Japan: Hawks coming out of the woodwork By Axel Berkofsky

Can a self-declared pacifist country attack another country preemptively and go nuclear?

Japan may have to do both as far as parts of Japan's defense establishment and right-wingers in the country's ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) are concerned. While LDP defense hawks and the country's Defense Agency chief Shigeru Ishiba himself were allegedly flirting with the idea of attacking North Korea before it pulls the trigger first, it was recently revealed that Japan was looking into the feasibility of joining the nuclear-weapons club even back in the 1990s.

In 1995, after the first nuclear crisis on the Korean Peninsula in 1994, Japan's Defense Agency reportedly compiled a 31-page "internal" (read secret) report looking into the pros and cons of having nukes in Japan. The report, drawn up during the administration of socialist prime minister Tomiichi Murayama, whose party was strongly opposed to even maintaining armed forces before coming to power in 1994, concluded that Japan's neighbors don't have to worry about a nuclear Japan. "The discussion in favor of owning nuclear weapons lacks sufficient study into the negative impact, while the idea that not possessing nuclear weapons is detrimental is not sufficiently backed by military theory," the report said.

Japan's own experience with nuclear weapons, however, might have suggested a somewhat different explanation why going nuclear should not be an option and the country's allegedly sacred three non-nuclear principles - not introducing, not possessing and not producing nuclear weapons - did not seem to be a problem back then. Instead, the report concluded that nuclear weapons are not in the "nation's best economic and political interest" - producing and storing nukes were not only considered too expensive, but would also upset the United States and the regional balance of power.

Japan's Defense Agency insists that there have been no other studies on Japanese nuclear weapons after 1995 and claims that that study was only undertaken to "reassure" neighbors in East Asia that Japan would not go nuclear even if North Korea threatened to do so.

If that sounds pretty implausible, that's because it is. It seems that the Japanese press found nothing unusual about the fact that the report was leaked just as Pyongyang was flexing its military muscles threatening to inflict "total war" over East Asia.

On the other hand, who can really blame Japanese hawks for discussing nuclear options when even South Korea's outgoing president Kim Dae-jung, usually soft-spoken and dovish when dealing with his cousins in the north, got carried away in the heat of the moment. "If North Korea gets nuclear weapons, the stance of Japan and our country toward nuclear weapons could change," he said on February 18, advising Pyongyang not to "even dream of getting nuclear weapons".

CNN changed the "could" into a "would" in Kim's statement, while US commentators believed that Japan and South Korea could indeed be obliged to get nukes rather sooner than later. "If Pyongyang is allowed to go nuclear, there will be strong pressure on South Korea and Japan to go nuclear as well," James E Goodby, former US diplomat in residence at Stanford University, wrote in the International Herald Tribune two days after Kim's remarks.

Kim himself had second thoughts about his belligerent rhetoric and toned down his own remarks on the very same day, saying, "I believe the danger of war is slight - in fact non-existent."

Not as far as Shigeru Ishiba, Japan's defense hawk-in-chief, is concerned.

During a parliamentary debate last week, he announced that Japan might consider attacking North Korea in "self-defense" if there were "sufficient evidence" that Pyongyang was preparing to launch a missile attack on his country.

Attacking North Korea preemptively?

That's what parts of the non-Japanese media heard, thereby "relying on mistranslations between the original Japanese and the English idea of 'preemptive strike'", said Chris Hughes, senior research fellow at the Center for the Study of Globalization and Regionalization at the University of Warwick in England. "Neither Kawaguchi [Japan's foreign minister] nor Ishiba have used the word 'preemptive strike' [sensei kogeki] when speaking in the parliament," he added, indicating that the foreign press made Japan more bellicose than it really is.

Ishiba, known for hawkish rhetoric and, as a Japanese political commentator put it, his belief that "a-shut-mouth-catches-no-flies attitude" is for weaklings, reconsidered his line and published a statement on his agency's website denying that his remarks meant that Japan was preparing to launch a preemptive strike against North Korea.

"If North Korea said it was going to turn us into a sea of fire and were about to load their missiles with fuel, Japan would start to consider whether North Korea had started an attack," said Ishiba, trying to defuse his explosive rhetoric.

Even Robyn Lim, professor of International Relations at Nagoya University, usually in favor of a tough line toward North Korea, fears that Ishiba might have leaned too far out of the window. "His statement doesn't help matters because it is not a credible threat. Japan doesn't have aircraft capable of attacking North Korea and returning home," Lim wrote.

Japan's defense establishment hopes that won't be true for much longer. By 2005, a couple of US-made in-flight-refueling aircraft will become part of the Japanese air force, allowing it to operate farther from home.

For now, however, Japanese Aegis high-tech destroyers, currently cruising in the Sea of Japan conducting "anti-North Korea drills", as Japan's Yomiuri Shimbun reports, would not even be able to shoot down incoming rogue missiles. "The ability of Aegis cruisers to actually shoot down missiles at this time is zero, since Japan's missiles on the Aegis vessels are not yet configured and developed for missile defense. It will need US assistance to shoot down anything at all," Hughes said.

A North Korean missile is only a 10-minute ride away from downtown Tokyo and, fearing that its military would indeed merely be reduced to cleaning up the mess, the Japanese government recently filed an emergency report instructing the armed forces on what to do in an after-impact scenario.

While six younger LDP hotheads filed a bill suggesting to impose economic sanctions on North Korea on the spot, Yasuo Fukuda, chief cabinet secretary, urged his colleagues to remain "calm" and hold off on economic sanctions for now. A good idea, indeed, as cautious political commentators in Japan fear that imposing economic sanctions might encourage Pyongyang to make up for the loss of legal revenues by exporting missiles to other "rogue states" and smuggling drugs in the Sea of Japan.

Japan wants first-hand information on these activities as well and on March 28 will launch its first spy satellite to check on "suspicious" ships (usually North Korean spy and smuggler ships, says the government) in Japanese territorial waters. (See Look up, Mr Kim: Japan's spy in the sky, January 15.)

When the United States and Japan held another round of bilateral "strategic dialogues" last week, Washington informed Tokyo that the US is considering increasing its military presence on Japanese soil. Japan's government, unlike the majority of the country's public, "welcomed" the US advice to better have one finger on the trigger when dealing with North Korea.

Japan's public, however, seems less paranoid about North Korea attacking Japan. Most of them think Tokyo is not in charge anyway and is reportedly confident that the United States will solve the crisis with North Korea bilaterally.

"Not in my name" read the banners of anti-war demonstrators all over the world a week ago, and the Japanese public might consider getting a couple of those flags the next time its government elaborates on its North Korea policy.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Japan; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: ally; japan

1 posted on 02/25/2003 10:26:51 AM PST by Enemy Of The State
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
PING!
2 posted on 02/25/2003 10:27:10 AM PST by Enemy Of The State (To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enemy Of The State
What we do have is too many damn WOODPECKERS in the home forest (like Clooney, Farrrell, Sarranden, O'Donnell, etc)!
3 posted on 02/25/2003 10:30:17 AM PST by princess leah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Enemy Of The State
Sick em...
4 posted on 02/25/2003 10:32:48 AM PST by IonInsights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enemy Of The State
"His statement doesn't help matters because it is not a credible threat. Japan doesn't have aircraft capable of attacking North Korea and returning home," Lim wrote.

Japanese pilot no wurry bout return home hahahahahahahahahaha

5 posted on 02/25/2003 10:39:05 AM PST by winodog (I fear the monkey in your soul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enemy Of The State
Actually the debate over the relationship between pacifism and defense, and between the ancient Japanese warrior ideal and the modern Japanese pacifist ideal, has been simmering in Japan for a long time.

It is one of the main themes in Japanese popular culture. It is the central idea driving the plot of the anime series Gundam Wing and one of the core ideas in two of the most popular anime series of the 1990's: Escaflowne and Neon Genesis Evangelion (although the later is more about alienation and the human condition generally).

6 posted on 02/25/2003 10:49:33 AM PST by The_Reader_David
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enemy Of The State
The Nattion of Japan will use this North Korean provocation to openly disclose nuclear arms at some point; the real danger is China whose diplomatic support of N.Korea has enabled the hermit kingdom to flex its ugly head. China has been make the same noise for several years. China will have to face nuclear arms in South Korea, Taiwan, Japan and the USA if it attacks any one of these four nations....
7 posted on 02/25/2003 10:50:19 AM PST by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jumper
Red China's fingerprints are all over the NK "crisis." They want the US out of the Pacific and they're not going to stop with Taiwan.
8 posted on 02/25/2003 10:59:23 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Enemy Of The State
Hey Japan, why not do a surprise attack on their unsuspecting Naval Fleet some Sunday morning?
9 posted on 02/25/2003 11:40:20 AM PST by latrans (Live Free or Die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enemy Of The State
"If North Korea gets nuclear weapons, the stance of Japan and our country toward nuclear weapons could change," he (South Korea's outgoing president Kim Dae-jung) said on February 18, advising Pyongyang not to "even dream of getting nuclear weapons".

Sorry pal, but the dreaming part is over. NK has nukes and you'd better wake up to the fact.

10 posted on 02/25/2003 11:42:28 AM PST by AlaskaErik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: winodog; AmericanInTokyo
Cheech Marin in character as Sessue Hayakwawa in Character:

Honorabrrlllllle Kamikaze pirots of Rllising Sun Empire of Japan!

You guys know the rest...

11 posted on 02/25/2003 11:56:56 AM PST by OKSooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: latrans
lol...
12 posted on 02/25/2003 11:57:01 AM PST by Enemy Of The State (To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Enemy Of The State
China would do well to restrain their commie pal; we are holding the cards here, not them.

Nuclear Japan.........Chairman Mao, how does that sound? (laughing)

13 posted on 02/25/2003 11:59:51 AM PST by He Rides A White Horse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enemy Of The State
Shhhh. The left would have us believe that we are the in this fight alone and that North Korea is out to get us (U.S.) alone.

Of course Japan has been saying that they will strike out at Korea if the threat of an attack seems imminent.

14 posted on 02/25/2003 1:53:01 PM PST by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

BUMP!
15 posted on 02/25/2003 2:34:07 PM PST by HighRoadToChina (Never Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Enemy Of The State; HighRoadToChina
If Japan decided to develop nukes today, it would only take a few months to field a very effective nuclear deterrent force, complete with ICBMs.
16 posted on 02/25/2003 3:07:10 PM PST by Sparta (Statism is a Mental Illness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson