Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The hip bone is connected to the ...

Posted on 02/21/2003 6:46:50 PM PST by tentmaker

Among other issues brought up by each of these Security Council resolutions, they form an interesting chain of connections.

S/RES/687 (1991) 8 April 1991 - called for disclosure of weapons

S/RES/707 (1991) 15 August 1991 - said Iraq was in material breach of 687

S/RES/715 (1991) 11 October 1991 - demanded that Iraq meet it's obligations under 687 and 707

S/RES/1060 (1996) 12 June 1996 - said Iraq had violated 687, 707 and 715

S/RES/1115 (1997) 21 June 1997 - condemns Iraq for clear and flagrant violation of 687, 707, 715 and 1060

S/RES/1134 (1997) 23 October 1997 - condemns Iraq for clear and flagrant violation of 687, 707, 715, 1060 and 1115

S/RES/1137 (1997) 12 November 1997 - Condemns the continued violations by Iraq of its obligations under the relevant resolutions

S/RES/1154 (1998) 2 March 1998 - warns that any violation of 687 would have severest consequences for Iraq

S/RES/1194 (1998) 9 September 1998 - Condemns Iraq for suspending cooperation, which constitutes a totally unacceptable contravention of its obligations under resolutions 687, 707, 715, 1060, 1115 and 1154
(maybe they forgot 1134 and 1137 on this one [shrug])

S/RES/1205 (1998) 5 November 1998 - Condemns Iraq for ceasing cooperation as a flagrant violation of resolution 687 others
(they were getting weary of repeating the numbers by now)

S/RES/1441 (2002) 8 November 2002 - RECALLING all its previous relevant resolutions, in particular its resolutions 661 (1990) of 6 August 1990, 678 (1990) of 29 November 1990, 686 (1991) of 2 March 1991, 687 (1991) of 3 April 1991, 688 (1991) of 5 April 1991, 707 (1991) of 15 August 1991, 715 (1991) of 11 October 1991, 986 (1995) of 14 April 1995, and 1284 (1999) of 17 December 1999, and all the relevant statements of its president,

1. DECIDES that Iraq has been and remains in material breach of its obligations under relevant resolutions, including resolution 687 (1991), in particular through Iraq’s failure to cooperate with United Nations inspectors and the IAEA, and to complete the actions required under paragraphs 8 to 13 of resolution 687 (1991);

Every single one of these resolutions ends with the words: "Decides to remain seized of the matter." Maybe the problem is that the Security Council is determined to remained "seized".

SOURCES:
http://www.un.org/Depts/unscom/
http://www.iraqwatch.org/un/index.html


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: hussein; iraq; resolutions; securitycouncil; un; weapons

1 posted on 02/21/2003 6:46:50 PM PST by tentmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tentmaker
Bunch O'Breaches Bump!
2 posted on 02/21/2003 6:50:23 PM PST by mc5cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tentmaker
Great summary of UNWEENINESS. Bookmarked for later ammo! BUMP!!
3 posted on 02/21/2003 6:53:26 PM PST by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions = VERY expensive, very SCRATCHY toilet paper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tentmaker
"Decides to remain seized of the matter." Sounds like some Michael Jacksonesque move on stage ... with his gloved paw. Does it mean they 'decided to keep the matter in their thoughts'? 'Cause they certainly haven't allowed the 'matter' to escalate to the point they would have to act, kind of kept it frozen in the abstract, don'tcha know!
4 posted on 02/21/2003 6:54:15 PM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tentmaker
thx for posting this.
5 posted on 02/21/2003 6:56:16 PM PST by sauropod (It's OK to drive an SUV if it helps you get babes.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tentmaker
bookmark BUMP
6 posted on 02/21/2003 9:12:20 PM PST by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tentmaker
Is this that rush to war thing I hear the Democrats talking about, or the dangerous unilateralism they are talking about?
7 posted on 02/22/2003 4:58:52 AM PST by William McKinley (You're so vain, you probably think this tagline's about you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
"Decides to remain seized of the matter." Sounds like some Michael Jacksonesque move on stage

im thinking bowel obstruction....well, this is an anatomical thread, right?

8 posted on 02/22/2003 6:03:17 AM PST by 1john2 3and4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mc5cents
Bunch O'Breaches Bump! LOL!
9 posted on 02/22/2003 6:04:19 AM PST by 1john2 3and4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson