Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Liberal-Leaning Radio Network Planned
AP | 2/18/03 | WILL LESTER

Posted on 02/17/2003 11:14:18 PM PST by kattracks

WASHINGTON, Feb 18, 2003 (AP Online via COMTEX) -- A group planning a liberal-leaning radio network says the idea hasn't caught on in previous attempts because it wasn't marketed properly and wasn't entertaining enough.

Now venture capitalists from Chicago and an Atlanta radio executive are behind an effort to start just such a radio network that would offer an alternative to conservative talk show hosts like Rush Limbaugh.

"We believe this is a tremendous business opportunity," Atlanta radio executive Jon Sinton said Monday. Sinton, who would be the network's chief executive, added, "There are so many right-wing talk shows, we think it's created a hole in the market you could drive a truck through."

The group, led by Anita Drobny, consists of investors who have financially supported Democratic candidates. Hoping to start the network by this fall, they are talking with comedian and author Al Franken about working with the network and hope to attract other entertainers and political guests.

Their group will be called AnShell Media L.L.C. and they are initially investing $10 million while hoping for assistance from like-minded entrepreneurs.

Sinton said those who lean to the right are great at haranguing Bill and Hillary Clinton, but those who lean left have better connections to the entertainment world in Hollywood and New York.

"We want to take an issue and make it funny and engaging," he said. "Our intent is to engage and entertain as a way to enlighten, engage in skit comedy, parody, political satire."

Sinton said earlier programs have failed because they were placed in time slots between more conservative programming and weren't entertaining enough. Former New York Gov. Mario Cuomo also tried his hand at a liberal-oriented talk show.

Sinton said he's confident he can come up with solid content for his network.

"My business strategy is that there are underperforming radio stations in all the markets. These underperforming stations are looking for a compelling broadcast day," he said.

While questions have been raised about who could be host on a liberal talk show, the bigger question may be the difficulty of mobilizing an audience for such a show.

A sign of the liberal dilemma is the code word that they like to use to describe themselves these days - "progressive" - which allows them to avoid the word "liberal," which has become almost an epithet when used by conservative politicians and pundits.

"Part of the impetus for this angry conservative bent of talk radio is the notion that the press is unfair, that it's part of a liberal establishment conspiracy," said Tom Rosenstiel, director for the Project for Excellence in Journalism.

"Progressives historically don't run in a pack," Rosenstiel added. "There's a kind of independent streak to the left wing in America that there isn't in the right wing."

Communications specialist Kathleen Hall Jamieson, who was involved in a study of talk radio in the mid 1990s, said the conservative radio audience is easier to mobilize because it is more likely to see liberals as very distant from their own views. And there are more people in polls who identify themselves as conservative than identify themselves as liberal.

"The search for the liberal equivalent of Rush Limbaugh may be misunderstanding how Limbaugh starts from a natural advantage," said Jamieson, director of the Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania. "His audience is already polarized. The liberals don't need a host, they need a different audience."

By WILL LESTER Associated Press Writer



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 next last
To: Teacher317
unfortunately when the leftists throw that ton of money into this money pit, they will be able to write off the losses on their taxes, thus leaving the taxpayers to pick up the tab...

i for one am looking forward to that short dorky idiot, al franken falling flat on his face again...

the reasons for liberal radio failure have been explained beautifully here on FR, but when these hosts start getting intelligent arguements from the other side, they will be exposed as vile entities...

61 posted on 02/18/2003 6:14:59 AM PST by teeman8r
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: teeman8r
looking forward to that short dorky idiot, al franken falling flat on his face again

It's funny that the author of "...is a big, fat, idiot" is himself getting rotund while the target of his derision has become svelte.

62 posted on 02/18/2003 7:00:22 AM PST by MrB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

Comment #63 Removed by Moderator

To: Teacher317
Maybe they could call it the 'Salon.com Radio Network'?

'National Propaganda Radio'?

'Radio KOOL', All Kool Aid, all the time?

'Democrats On the Air' (the DOA network)?

The Mediocrity in Broadcasting Network?

64 posted on 02/18/2003 7:19:37 AM PST by Steel Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I would hate to a salesman for any station that has to sell time for the "Liberal Show".
My best advertising prospects, bailbondsmen, check cashing services, and Legal Aid.
65 posted on 02/18/2003 7:23:13 AM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #66 Removed by Moderator

To: TennTuxedo
Without a worthwhile message, few will listen, thus they will not secure many advertisers to sponsor the show. Without sponsorship, no show lasts long.

Uh, yeah. There's a term that comes to mind when I think about my last post. What is it? Oh yeah: sarcasm.

In other words, of course I agree with you TT. The point is to make the liberal fantasy animating the last post explicit.

67 posted on 02/18/2003 7:32:06 AM PST by Timm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The reason Liberal talk radio notoriously gathers small audiences is because inherent in the message is a certain disapproval of the U.S., ranging from discomfort all the way to venomous hatred. IEAMERCIARADIO.COM's Peter Werbe and Mike Malloy are good examples of the latter. And of course, there is the psychotic Amy Goodman of Pacifica radio. Most Americans, including regular Democrats, don't want to hear endless, gratuitous U.S. bashing.

What is conspicuous about Werbe and Malloy is their diminutive audience. Syndicated on less than 10 stations in addition to the internet feed, they take calls from a handful of regulars on a daily basis and their phone is never busy. Never. I know because I've talked to each host half a dozen times. This is indicatative of a very small call load.

68 posted on 02/18/2003 7:36:34 AM PST by Interious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Liberals to launch talk radio network

Al Franken to Captain this Titanic undertaking!

Bon Voyage!

69 posted on 02/18/2003 7:39:52 AM PST by Young Werther
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Nobody will listen to Bill and Hillary's new network.
70 posted on 02/18/2003 8:20:49 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
I like the ones that say "My underachiever is sleeping with your honor student"
71 posted on 02/18/2003 8:24:47 AM PST by finnman69 (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Liberal-Leaning Radio Network Planned

You mean, network television "lite?"

72 posted on 02/18/2003 8:25:15 AM PST by A2J (France is a nation of poo-poo heads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lion's Cub
Liberal radio will fail the same way Salon did.
73 posted on 02/18/2003 8:28:28 AM PST by RadiationRomeo (Proud Catholic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Lion's Cub
This is great! Let them spend $10 million on this radio venture. That is $10 million less they have to contribute to the dimwits.
74 posted on 02/18/2003 8:35:18 AM PST by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: MrB
perhaps rush's next book should do the fatte' franken a nod entitle "I guess it takes one to know one, how al franken became the object of big fat idiot jokes"
75 posted on 02/18/2003 9:37:16 AM PST by teeman8r
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
“Progressive” is not another term for liberal... it means socialist.


Johnny7:

You are absolutely right. As we know, the term "liberal" applies to people who espouse individual rights and responsibilities, private property, free exchange of goods and ideas, tolerance and limited and representative government. Leftists oppose all of these things in greater or lesser measure.

Even the Left recognize that the label liberal does not fit well on them. Indeed, the "Progressives" wish to distinguish themselves from the squishy left of the Democrat Party which proudly wears the label liberal, a tendency for which it generally has contempt (not BOLD enough). Hence the need to adopt the progressive moniker: it distinguishes them from the statist liberals, identifies them among the annointed as revolutionairies, but does so in a way that doesn't scare the soccer moms and other possible allies in the bourgeois middle classes.

As for Left Wing radio, I welcome it to the field of competition, but I doubt it will be commercially viable. Limbaugh is successful for two principal reasons: 1) the host is an especially talented broadcaster; and 2) the show is seen by its listeners as an antidote to the liberalism of the mainstream media. Because the mainstream media lies so far to the political left, Limbaugh's show can be comfortably in the opposition without assuming any truly objectionable positions.

It is highly unlikely that the Left will find a broadcaster equal of Limbaugh's skills. Certainly, the unfunny gasbag Franken is not. Moreover, the host could not easily use the mainstream media as a foil. To distinguish himself from NPR, NYT, Brokaw, Jennings and Rather, he would have to either: (1) move to an extreme left position, i.e. reflexive anti-Americanism, environmental utopianism and collectivist economics; or (2) rely on an endless repitition of Saturday Night Live-style "Bush is a Moron" jokes. I don't think anyone would disagree that the market for such garbage is small. Consequently, this project is dead on arrival.

It will be pleasant to see the Chicago fools and their money soon parted. I only wish I could figure out a way of getting some of it to flow my way.
76 posted on 02/18/2003 10:12:02 AM PST by irish_links
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: irish_links
Liberal:

Soul Mates: The Meltdown Continues
Tom Daschle calls Dick Gephardt
his "partner and soul mate" in the
afterglow of his mid-week meltdown.
This is too good...
Week of 9-23-2002








Progressive:


Nancy Pelosi

77 posted on 02/18/2003 1:50:53 PM PST by MeekOneGOP (Bu-bye SADdam. You're soon to meet your buddy Stalin in Hades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Timm
Gotcha. I didn't see your "</sarcasm>"
78 posted on 02/18/2003 3:01:27 PM PST by TennTuxedo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: All
I think there are two main reasons for the success of conservative talk radio:

1. Rush, Savage, Glenn Beck, Howie Carr, Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity, Dr. Laura, Mike Reagan, Gene Burns and others are entertaining. I don't get bored listening.

2. Millions of people are muttering such things as "damned right" and "it's about time somebody said that", while they listen to the show. We've been so frustrated for so long by the politically correct, liberal media that conservative talk is a breath of fresh air.
79 posted on 02/18/2003 3:15:04 PM PST by Poser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LaraCroft
One point that everyone seems to be missing is that the left DOES have the 'gift', evil as it may be of mobilizing people and of getting thier word out.. marketing their views in a way that makes it seem far bigger than it is.

Jump to this post to see another reason for that:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/844402/posts?page=17#17

-

Instead of laughing and pointing, perhaps we should learn what to do to get a few million people to show up for a rally and to get the federal goverment to fund out TV and Radio.

You are correct in a certain sense. However, we do not likely want to follow their example or use the same tactics and deceptions. They represent failure for a reason.

What do you mean by saying "get the federal goverment to fund out TV and Radio." ???

80 posted on 02/18/2003 10:09:24 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson