Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Please explain the difference between .38 and .380 (vanity)
2/16/03 | self

Posted on 02/16/2003 7:49:45 PM PST by rudy45

I had always believed that the caliber of a gun was the inside diameter of the barrel. Assuming I am correct (am I?) then shouldn't .38 and .380 be "close"? If I remember from high school math, the latter simply implies a greater degree of precision. IOW, a .38 caliber really could be anything from .376 to .384, while .380 caliber has smaller variance--.3796 to .3804?

However, the attendant at a local range said that .38 refers to revolvers while .380 refers to pistols (?)

Thanks.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 380acp; banglist; guns
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 next last
To: JRandomFreeper
That turns out to not be the case, in my experience.

After a good night's sleep, I have a fresh perspective on your experience. Recall that I mentioned the .45 ACP headspaces on the case mouth. That is because it is a straight-walled case. The case mouth diameter when crimped is the same as the case head diameter. That is NOT the case with 9mm brass. The 9mm and .380 ACP are tapered. The case mouth is smaller than the case head. The consequence is that your .380 was probably dangling into the firing chamber, hanging by the case head. A proper fit between the brass cartridge case and firing chamber provides support for the brass on all surfaces. The .380 ACP in the 9mm chamber would have no support beyond the case head. Upon insertion, the weight of the bullet at the case mouth would be slightly nose down i.e. the cartridge would not be colinear with the bore of the barrel. The bolt face could exert pressure on the lower edge of the case head to straighten that misalignment. Under this condition, the firing pin would have access to the primer. Firing that round would raise the possibility of pressure ballooning of the unsupported brass casing between the case head and case mouth. A burst or split may also occur. The consequence might be a jammed piece of brass or a failed extraction. It is something you definitely want to avoid.

The .380 also has a smaller bullet weight and powder charge. Even if you successfully fire the round, the mass of the slide and recoil spring is tuned to the mass of a 9mm bullet and powder charge. It is unlikely that enough energy will be transferred to the slide to properly cycle the blow back action of the 9mm pistol.

81 posted on 02/17/2003 11:18:08 AM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: rudy45
The difference....besides the extra zero at the end?

If memory serves, at one time American pistol calibers were referred, for some reason, to the outside cartridge caliber, rather than the inside bore of the barrel.

Hence, the actual bore of the .38 is .357; the .357 magnum is just a lengthened .38 catridge case, with more powder and chambers capable of withstanding the higher pressures of the more modern powders used in the .357; you can fire .38 cartridge inside a .357 cylinder, but not the reverse, for safety reasons. And since these are revolver cartridges, they are rimmed.

The .380 is just the American name for the 9mm Kurtz, or short, cartidge, which is shorter (9x17mm, I think?) than the standard 9x19mm NATO (or Parabellum, or Luger, etc.). Being a semi-auto cartridge, the .380 is rimless. I think (if memory serves) the actual bore for a 9mm is .351, so it is close to, but slightly less than, the bore of the .357/.38.

82 posted on 02/17/2003 11:26:23 AM PST by Vast Buffalo Wing Conspiracy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin
The new S&W 500 Magnum is rated at 2600 ft-lbs of muzzle energy.

Yes, but the best pistol is still a rifle.

83 posted on 02/17/2003 11:33:49 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Ursus arctos horribilis
Have you ever owned or fired the Rock Island 1911 that is currently avalible for ~$350? I've heard conflicting opinions. Some say it jambs. Other say its a good way to own a 1911 and not spend a grand.
84 posted on 02/17/2003 11:43:52 AM PST by oyez (Is this a great country...........Or what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: oyez
I have no personal knowledge of the pistol. You might just try punching it into Google to weigh the pros and cons.

Sorry I wasn't much help
85 posted on 02/17/2003 4:38:21 PM PST by Ursus arctos horribilis ("It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!" Emiliano Zapata 1879-1919)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: oyez
Go to www.1911forum.com

Search around. Best forum on the internet for 1911 related guns.

86 posted on 02/17/2003 4:44:10 PM PST by Double Tap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
John, John, John. And here I had so much respect for you. You carry ANYTHING in .380?

Oh yeah - you live in the south, where you don't have to worry about the fact that a .380 won't penetrate multiple layers of clothing.....

(just giving you a hard time - but I'd still consider something larger) :-)
87 posted on 02/17/2003 4:45:52 PM PST by The Coopster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: The Coopster
When your max weight (ever) is 130, you have to consider a smaller weapon. Besides, with Hydra-Shoks or some of the frangible rounds, it's adequate.

If I weighed 210 and stood 6'2", I'd carry a 1911 Colt or Colt Commander. Period.

/john

88 posted on 02/17/2003 4:55:10 PM PST by JRandomFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: The Coopster
You carry ANYTHING in .380?

Heck yeah. I've never had a problem with my Walther, and it's much more comfy to carry concealed than any 1911 could be.

Remember, a .22 in the hand beats a .45 at home!

89 posted on 02/17/2003 6:05:59 PM PST by Chemist_Geek ("Drill, R&D, and conserve" should be our watchwords! Energy independence for America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

Comment #90 Removed by Moderator

To: JRandomFreeper
so firing a .380 in a 9mmP chamber could cause a case rupture and damage to the gun and your hand.

Most likely a .380 in a 9mm chamber would not fire at all. Most autoloader cartridges are rimless and headspace on the shoulder, in this case the leading edge of the case, so there would be too much slop in the fit for the firing pin to hit the primer unless you pointed it straight up! Even then a case rupture shouldn't harm a pistol built to withstand 50% greater chamber pressure but still not a good Idea.

I used to reload 9mm for my Browning Hi-Power using 80 gr. .380 bullets loaded to 1400 fps, it was quite spectacular.

91 posted on 02/17/2003 6:15:44 PM PST by Vinnie_Vidi_Vici
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: NineMillimeter
Between the 95 grain standard .380 and the 115 grain standard 9mm there is some overlap. Look at a reloading manual.

You can reload the 9mm in a lighter practice bullet with less kick (great for the wife) and you can reload the .380 with a slightly heavier bullet.

10% heavier on the .380 and 10% lighter on the 9mm means you can use the same bullet. Powder loads, are a different story, however.

/john

92 posted on 02/17/2003 6:19:44 PM PST by JRandomFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Vinnie_Vidi_Vici
I was there. It chambered, it fired, it didn't feed or feel right.

I'm sitting here with a 9mm round (Winchester factory load) and a .380 round (PMC cheap commercial reload). I also have a micrometer. The .380 reads 0.368 at the base. The 9mm reads 0.3862.

I think the ejector on the wife's Sig held the .380 round in place even though it was 0.0182 inches smaller than the 9mm round.

/john

93 posted on 02/17/2003 6:32:05 PM PST by JRandomFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: sailorforfreedom
The 357 SIG case is essentially a 40 cal. autoloader case, necked down to accept the 357 bullet. You can convert a Glock from 40 cal. to 357SIG, or vice-versa, by just replacing the barrel (a two-minute job).

Yea, it's really great... just make sure not to stuff a .357SIG into the .40S&W barrel and vice-versa...

94 posted on 02/18/2003 11:29:03 AM PST by Studebaker Hawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: rudy45

Force does not equl mass times acceleration squared, but rather just the mass times the acceleration (F=ma)


95 posted on 12/27/2004 8:43:17 AM PST by godpartii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: RecentConvert

Not to worry, Rudy. I have a Taurus .357 mag and I shoot .38+Ps in it all the time. Also I have a college degree, but half this stuff is over my head, too!


96 posted on 10/15/2007 5:06:21 AM PDT by VietnamFatCatDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Dave S

In a rimless cartridge like the 380 ACP and the 9MM Luger the depth that the cartridge seats (also known as head space) into the chamber is set by the front rim of the cartridge. In a many rimmed cartridges like the 38 Special and 357 Magnum the head space is set by the base rim. That being the case, you can safely fire a 38 special in a 357 magnum because the case is shorter and is head spaced on the base. A 357 cartridge will not drop far enough into a 38 special because chamber isn’t deep enough to allow the longer case to fit. This was by design to keep the heavier loaded 357’s from firing in lighter framed guns.

If you were to drop a 9mm cartridge into a 380 Auto, the case would bottom out in the chamber and leave about a quarter inch sticking out of the chamber and the action would not close. On most guns if you were to drop a 380 Auto cartridge into a 9mm the case would drop too far into the chamber and the firing pin would not reach the primer. If by chance you could get either to fire you would likely have problems because of either an action that was not closed or too much movement of the case inside the chamber.

In both cases, as someone above mentioned, caliber sizes are mostly naming conventions. 38 Special and 357 mag both use a .357 caliber bullet. 380 ACP and 9MM both use a .355 caliber bullet.

It’s even more interesting to look at rifles. There are bunches of 30 caliber rifles that all shoot varying shapes and weights of bullets that are all .308


97 posted on 02/17/2009 9:00:39 PM PST by sniklacg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: sailorforfreedom

Thx,excellent review


98 posted on 01/12/2015 10:31:02 AM PST by advertising guy ( Muslims, another white meat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA

“How does that make you M-16/AR-15 fans feel — to recognize that your rifle’s case diameter is the same as the relatively puny .380 pistol cartridge...? ;-}”

Considering that a 5.56 mm bullet has as much energy at 100 yards as a .45 ACP does at the muzzle, not too bad. Why?


99 posted on 01/12/2015 2:28:03 PM PST by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Oschisms

No, a .380 is a 9mm short, 9mm Luger ammunition is too long to fit in the chamber. You can fire a .380 in a 9mm Luger but it likely won’t cycle reliably after the first shot because the magazine is not designed for the shorter ammunition. Longer 9mm cases will not chamber in a .380 and firing 9mm Luger ammunition in a .380 should not be attempted. 9mm ammunition in general is loaded with heavier bullet, the case holds more powder, and greater pressure is generated when the bullet is fired.


100 posted on 05/08/2016 10:01:44 PM PDT by cabincowboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson