[ResistorSister]

I posted this story from my local paper to show that no matter where these "Anti-War" protest are conducted...they end up being an "Anti-Bush" and "Anti-Republican" protest.

[CarmelValleyite]

Absolutely, 100% correct that these U.S. "anti-war" protests are poorly disguised anti-Bush, anti-Republican/Conservative rallies that dredge up the Sore-Loserman types, old hippies, college idiots and other assorted flotsam and jetsam of every imaginable group. The bottom line is: they ALL detest President Bush!

[Mr. Blond]

“Hans Blix told America yesterday that there is no evidence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.”

“Bush knows Saddam has weapons of mass destruction. Of course, man. He sold them to him.”

So, Bush Jr. sold Saddam WMD's, the ones that he doesn't really have...

[knuthom]

William Timpe: “There are too many bleeding hearts and not enough rational minds.”

This should be the quote of the day.

[Cindy]

"ARE THEY FOR US OR AGAINST US?" (Updated Daily.)

[anniegetyourgun]

No doubt we'd be bombing Iraq right now (with minor success) in relative national and international silence if Clinton were in office. In fact, Susan Sarandon would probably be sleeping in the Lincoln bedroom when the first bomb was hitting.

[metesky]

It seems to be a common theme that these farcical "peace" rallies are more anti-Republican and anti-Bush than anti-war.

Here's the last two paragraphs of the Boston Herald's front page story of the New York march:

But New Yorker Jim Dray, a 24-year-old engineer, was disgusted by the rally.

``It's unfortunate to see we're not rallying behind our president,'' Dray said, standing on a street corner away from the rally. ``This is more of an anti-Bush rally than an antiwar rally.''

[Lion Den Dan]

200 protesters? A sea of signs? Sounds to me more like a piddling mud puddle or a hog wallow.

[Smber]

What I find very ironic is that the protesters are quoted as shouting, "Obey the Constitution." Well, how many of those protesting in the US think it's okay for the federal government to redistribute earnings for the "social good?" Examples are Social Security, the Dept of Education, Medicare, Medicaid, etc. None of these are provided for in the Constitution.
Besides, didn't Congress already authorize the President last fall to take military action?

[Molly Pitcher]

Thanks RS for the thread.....I heard on tv some protestor in Europe say "We aren't anti-American, we're anti-Bush."

Funny, how they can rationalize just about anything....

[UCFRoadWarrior]

Thanks for the posting of the article. I think its now hard to ignore that these rallies are really anti-Bush rallies and not anti-war.

None of these people were out here when Clinton had his military actions. None of these people cared when Clinton bombed the aspirin factory in Sudan..the Commie Chinese embassy in Belgrade (and everything else in Belgrade)....the failure in Somalia....and also his 1998 bombing of Iraq

[GodBlessRonaldReagan]

There are too many bleeding hearts and not enough rational minds.

Amen!

[wewillnotfail]

SHOW YOUR SUPPORT
HAVE YOU VOTED TODAY?

cnn
moneyline
wolf.blitzer.reports
bbc.co.uk
citizen-times
wolf.blitzer.reports
cigardave

[Oldeconomybuyer]

Here in the U.S., he said, “There are too many bleeding hearts and not enough rational minds.”

Rational bump

[The Toad]

“I think Bush has been intent on war without any consideration of the inspections. And while Saddam is an evil man who should be stopped, this isn’t the way to do it,” said Jane Spear of Canton, a protester.

Yeah, right. That's why the US and UN have been trying for 12 years and 17 resolutions to get Saddam to disarm.

I am constantly amazed at how these people simply make this stuff up without having any facts to base it on...lol.

[Mr. Bungle]