Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Some voice concern over president's religious rhetoric
Boston Globe ^ | February 16, 2003 | John Donnelly

Posted on 02/16/2003 2:16:43 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife

Edited on 04/13/2004 2:09:08 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

WASHINGTON - In the midst of a war on terrorism and before a war in Iraq, two combatants are not shy about invoking the name of God.

And both President Bush and Osama bin Laden fervently assert that God is on their side.


(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: appeasement; communism; freedom; politics; religion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last
To: Cincinatus' Wife
And both President Bush and Osama bin Laden fervently assert that God is on their side.

This offends me to core. Bastards.

21 posted on 02/16/2003 5:23:33 AM PST by Big Guy and Rusty 99 ("Could be the Fuhrer Could be the local priest. You know sometimes Satan comes as a man of peace.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Oh, consider the source of this story. The Boston Globe occupies the same cess pool as the New York Times, LA Times and Washington Post. "All the Anti-American News We can make up!"
22 posted on 02/16/2003 5:25:41 AM PST by Redleg Duke (Stir the pot...don't let anything settle to the bottom where the lawyers can feed off of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thomas1066
I am so happy you have found peace and freedom in Canada. Now please renounce your American citizenship...it is wasted on you...it was an accident that you shouldn't be burdened with any longer.
23 posted on 02/16/2003 5:27:33 AM PST by Redleg Duke (Stir the pot...don't let anything settle to the bottom where the lawyers can feed off of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Articles like these are popping up all over the place lately. Sounds to me like these stories are being planted. The real fear is that President Bush is bringing faith back to America...a fear that the liberal elite find scarier than Saddam giving his WMD to Al Qaeda. I hope the President continues as he has. I find his speeches comforting and they tell me that his trust is in the right place..in the Lord.
24 posted on 02/16/2003 5:35:25 AM PST by Wait4Truth (God Bless our President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke
While we're at it, how about ban God Bless America? Now there's a song liberals would find fault with since God's clearly identified with our country's destiny.
25 posted on 02/16/2003 5:51:24 AM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: jimtorr
I, for one, am happy that GW speaks of God and faith in public.

I couldn't agree more. Look what happens when people don't have faith to guide them through the uncertain times in their lives. We need leaders who lead.

Consider also if our President didn't refer to God and Faith in leading our nation. Would young people (or anyone for that matter) think that God and faith were equated with the actions of terrorists, if the only time they heard the term "God" was in reference to evil propoganda? People look to faith and to God, the question is is where will they hear about it?

26 posted on 02/16/2003 5:58:34 AM PST by WellsFargo94
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
"Still, the president's reliance on faith and his expressed confidence that God blesses America, especially in speeches that deal with the need to confront Iraq, greatly concern some scholars."

Tough #%&*!!!!! Ask us if we care.
27 posted on 02/16/2003 6:01:52 AM PST by demkicker (I wanna kick some commie butt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thomas1066
"Unless Bush has a direct line to God, I too wish he would leave God out of his speeches. Even the angel of the Lord who appeared to Joshua refused to say God was on anybody's side."

Bush DOES have a "direct line" to God. He is what he is, a RELIGIOUS President. Bush merely asks God to bless America in his speeches, which has been done by many presidents before him.

I'm offended that you are offended by his remarks.
28 posted on 02/16/2003 6:07:16 AM PST by demkicker (I wanna kick some commie butt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Thomas1066
Unless Bush has a direct line to God, I too wish he would leave God out of his speeches.

I'm with you on that.

29 posted on 02/16/2003 6:13:34 AM PST by lucysmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jimtorr
"Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legislative powers of government reach actions only and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should `make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,' thus building a wall of separation between church and state."
Thomas Jefferson.

Christianity is nowhere mentioned in our Constitution.

Let's leave religion to our Churches to promote.

"This nation is founded and based on a faith in God."

In God yes...not Jesus Christ.

The primary leaders of the so-called founding fathers of our nation were not Bible-believing Christians; they were deists. Deism was a philosophical belief that was widely accepted by the colonial intelligentsia at the time of the American Revolution. Its major tenets included belief in human reason as a reliable means of solving social and political problems and belief in a supreme deity who created the universe to operate solely by natural laws. The supreme God of the Deists removed himself entirely from the universe after creating it. They believed that he assumed no control over it, exerted no influence on natural phenomena, and gave no supernatural revelation to man. A necessary consequence of these beliefs was a rejection of many doctrines central to the Christian religion. Deists did not believe in the virgin birth, divinity, or resurrection of Jesus, the efficacy of prayer, the miracles of the Bible, or even the divine inspiration of the Bible.

30 posted on 02/16/2003 6:48:37 AM PST by KDD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Thomas1066
A doubting Thomas, oh ye of little faith. What do you thing this uproar with the left is all about?

The one thing that sets this nation apart from all others is The Declaration of Independence ..... What our Heavenly Father gives to man no government can take away.

The left knows very well that they will not have control until that is removed from "FREE PEOPLE"

Ever wonder why the left calls the Constitution a living document? This is the door they try and keep open so they can rewrite it and put themselves in charge.

The first commandment tell us to have not other gods before Him, and if this country expects to continue as a "FREE PEOPLE", we very well better not hand over to man what our Heavenly Father gave to us.

31 posted on 02/16/2003 7:01:44 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Hey, I'm an atheist and even I know religion has nothing to to with our end of it. It is the nutty Islamists who have interjected their religious zeal into the killing of innocents.

Let George Bush express his personal religion, who cares. Any idiot can see that this not a conflict over religion on our part.

32 posted on 02/16/2003 7:25:03 AM PST by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wait4Truth
I hope the President continues as he has. I find his speeches comforting and they tell me that his trust is in the right place..in the Lord.

Bump!

33 posted on 02/16/2003 7:43:23 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
''The more I listen to him, the more truly worried I become about the vision for this country in the world,'' said Hurst Hannum, a professor of international law at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University. ''It's so American-centric, so Christian-centric. It's so certain. I guess I worry about anyone who is that sure he is right.''

God forbid America should have an American-centric President. And one who is certain he's right? Why, why, why...that's appalling! [Sputter, cough.]

34 posted on 02/16/2003 7:55:01 AM PST by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet (Eleven. Exactly. One louder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: KDD; jimtorr
Christianity is nowhere mentioned in our Constitution.

From Article VII
"Done in Convention by the Unanimous Consent of the States present the Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven..."

Just which LORD do you think they were referring to when they unanimously placed those words into our founding document?

35 posted on 02/16/2003 8:03:55 AM PST by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Well, I am an atheist, but I get a kick out of GW's speeches. I have a couple of reasons for this:

1) I know it ticks off leftists. Even policies that don't appeal to me personally gain a certain charm when I imagine the ACLU gnashing its teeth and rending its clothes over it.

2) I know that few atheists feel they have any moral authority to fight for America. I'm one of those few, but we are rarer than pro-Israel communists. Christians, however, DO feel confident in their right and duty to protect this country. So I'm perfectly happy with my Christian Cowboy president. Really, my only complaint is that he's not Right Wing enough.

36 posted on 02/16/2003 8:06:43 AM PST by A_perfect_lady (Let them eat cake.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KDD
You are half right, at best. SOME of the Founders were Deists. To assert that they were all Deists is as much folly as saying they were all Bible believing Christins.

Here are a couple of quotes which, I am sure, have not made your list:

"I have carefully examined the evidences of the Christian religion, and if I was sitting as a juror upon its authenticity I would unhesitatingly give my verdict in its favor. I can prove its truth as clearly as any proposition ever submitted to the mind of man." Alexander Hamilton

"It cannot be emphasized too strongly or too often that this great nation was founded, not by religionists, but by Christians; not on religions, but on the Gospel of Jesus Christ. For this very reason peoples of other faiths have been afforded asylum, prosperity, and freedom of worship here." Patrick Henry

"The Bible is worth all other books which have ever been printed." Patrick Henry

37 posted on 02/16/2003 8:13:44 AM PST by Skooz (Tagline removed by moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
Some Christians were of course involved in the shaping of our nation, but their influence was minor compared to the ideological contributions of the Deists who pressed for the formation of a secular nation. In describing the composition of the delegations to the constitutional convention, the historian Clinton Rossiter said this about their religious views

Whatever else it might turn out to be, the Convention would not be a `Barebone's Parliament.' Although it had its share of strenuous Christians like Strong and Bassett, ex-preachers like Baldwin and Williamson, and theologians like Johnson and Ellsworth, the gathering at Philadelphia was largely made up of men in whom the old fires were under control or had even flickered out. Most were nominally members of one of the traditional churches in their part of the country--the New Englanders Congregationalists, and Presbyterians, the Southerners Episcopalians, and the men of the Middle States everything from backsliding Quakers to stubborn Catholics--and most were men who could take their religion or leave it along. Although no one in this sober gathering would have dreamed of invoking the Goddess of Reason, neither would anyone have dared to proclaim that his opinions had the support of the God of Abraham and Paul. The Convention of 1787 was highly rationalist and even secular in spirit" ("The Men of Philadelphia," 1787 The Grand Convention, New York W. W. Norton & Company, 1987, pp. 147-148, emphasis added).

Needless to say, this view of the religious beliefs of the constitutional delegates differs radically from the picture that is often painted by modern fundamentalist leaders.

At the constitutional convention, Luther Martin a Maryland representative urged the inclusion of some kind of recognition of Christianity in the constitution on the grounds that "it would be at least decent to hold out some distinction between the professors of Christianity and downright infidelity or paganism." How ever, the delegates to the convention rejected this proposal and, as the Reverend Bird Wilson stated in his sermon quoted above, drafted the constitution as a secular document. God was nowhere mentioned in it.

As a matter of fact, the document that was finally approved at the constitutional convention mentioned religion only once, and that was in Article VI, Section 3, which stated that "no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States." Now if the delegates at the convention had truly intended to establish a "Christian nation," why would they have put a statement like this in the constitution and nowhere else even refer to religion?

Common sense is enough to convince any reasonable person that if the intention of these men had really been the formation of a "Christian nation," the constitution they wrote would have surely made several references to God, the Bible, Jesus, and other accouterments of the Christian religion, and rather than expressly forbidding ANY religious test as a condition for holding public office in the new nation, it would have stipulated that allegiance to Christianity was a requirement for public office. After all, when someone today finds a tract left at the front door of his house or on the windshield of his car, he doesn't have to read very far to determine that its obvious intention is to further the Christian religion. Are we to assume, then, that the founding fathers wanted to establish a Christian nation but were so stupid that they couldn't write a constitution that would make their purpose clear to those who read it?

Clearly, the founders of our nation intended government to maintain a neutral posture in matters of religion. Anyone who would still insist that the intention of the founding fathers was to establish a Christian nation should review a document written during the administration of George Washington.

Article 11 of the Treaty with Tripoli declared in part that "the government of the United States is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion..." This treaty was negotiated by the American diplomat Joel Barlow during the administration of George Washington. Washington read it and approved it, although it was not ratified by the senate until John Adams had become president. When Adams signed it, he added this statement to his signature "Now, be it known, that I, John Adams, President of the United States of America, having seen and considered the said treaty, do, by and within the consent of the Senate, accept, ratify and confirm the same, and every clause and article thereof."

This document and the approval that it received from our nation's first and second presidents and the U. S. Senate as constituted in 1797 do very little to support the popular notion that the founding fathers established our country as a "Christian nation."

38 posted on 02/16/2003 8:19:11 AM PST by KDD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Skooz
Historians, who deal with facts rather than wishes, paint an entirely different picture of the religious composition of America during its formative years than the image of a nation founded on "biblical principles" that modern Bible fundamentalists are trying to foist upon us. Our founding fathers established a religiously neutral nation, and a tragedy of our time is that so many people are striving to undo all that was accomplished by the wisdom of the founding fathers who framed for us a constitution that would protect the religious freedom of everyone regardless of personal creed. An even greater tragedy is that they many times hoodwink the public into believing that they are only trying to make our nation what the founding fathers would want it to be. Separation of church and state is what the founding fathers wanted for the nation, and we must never allow anyone to distort history to make it appear otherwise.
39 posted on 02/16/2003 8:33:02 AM PST by KDD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: KDD
You dodged the question.
40 posted on 02/16/2003 8:39:27 AM PST by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson