To: ATOMIC_PUNK
It's the right thing to do, and it will stop Bill Clinton from the job he wants the most, that is to be the U.N. leader and head.
2 posted on
02/15/2003 11:27:54 AM PST by
TLBSHOW
(God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
From Mr. Lamb's mouth to God's ears!!
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Putting the UN in charge of weapons inspections is as productive and responsible as having Bill Clinton share a motel room with your over-developed teenage daughter.
4 posted on
02/15/2003 11:35:47 AM PST by
Captainpaintball
(Peeing on liberalism's parade since 1996!!!)
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Our messge to the U.N.:
![](http://www.hench.net/images/un-burn.gif)
De-fund, Deport, Denounce, Disarm, Disband!
5 posted on
02/15/2003 11:37:15 AM PST by
Henchster
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
We need out now!
8 posted on
02/15/2003 11:41:11 AM PST by
admiralsn
(I say we pull out of the UN, move it to Baghdad, and then SHOW them how serious we are!)
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Those born in freedom are born to die;
as those born in bondage are born to die.
A few fight for freedom;
need one ask why?
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
If we let the UN die, would we not have to deal with the UN-DEAD?
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
The UN is dead, always has been.
11 posted on
02/15/2003 11:48:17 AM PST by
OldFriend
(Pray)
To: joanie-f; snopercod; mommadooo3; Covenantor; brityank; ATOMIC_PUNK; ladyinred
The U.N. is doing what it was meant to: prevent brute force fights between nations, from starting.
However, the U.N. is in addition, a model of committee un-productivity which is the taxing, ball - and - chain of world-wide university; wherein the burden of paperwork and studies are great, yet no work is done.
One finds this welfare program for the productivity-impaired, at university around the globe, which keeps/supports the otherwise un-supportable, said doctors of inertia and their beneficiaries (read: U. of C. Berkeley hippie-dippie - now - print shop owners and recipients of cash awards from the multitude of amendments to bills in the Congress ... in other words, keeping the un-employable employed at the propagandic engines of socialism).
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Can I vote 100Million times to let the thug center of the world die,If not here is my one vote.
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
To paraphrase Steve Forbes: Kill it, put a stake through it's heart, burn it and bury it.
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
HE has combined with others to subject us to a Jurisdiction foreign to our Constitution, and unacknowledged by our Laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:Cut and pasted from the Declaration of Independence.
17 posted on
02/15/2003 12:09:51 PM PST by
scouse
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Let it be!
20 posted on
02/15/2003 12:41:16 PM PST by
RichardW
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
I'm unsure if the Bush administration has the stones to unilaterally reject the UN's agenda. Our trend towards wide open borders, radical environmental policies that drive people from land they've had in their familiies for generations, the assault on privacy & private property rights, our involvement utilizing our troops as global policeman in numerous locations, an education system that promotes globalism at the expense of America's heritage just reeks with a strong odor of UN intervention in our affairs. I think if Bush's little Iraq adventure blows up in his face we'll be looking at a strong global push to give the UN more teeth when dealing with "recalcitrant" nations like the USA.
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Where is Dr. Kevorkian when he can actually do some good?
32 posted on
02/15/2003 3:30:44 PM PST by
TBP
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
I have never read anything that I so completely agree with as this article. Thanks for posting.
35 posted on
02/15/2003 4:17:13 PM PST by
bfree
(Liberals are EVIL!!!)
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
USA has no desire to leave the UN. The USA is the UN.
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
shouldnt this be moved to the backroom, as it contains a mean old libertarian, who might offend the weak minded?
39 posted on
02/16/2003 6:28:46 AM PST by
galt-jw
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson