Skip to comments.
Massachusetts Disarms Military Reservists
Gun Owners Action League ^
| 2/03
Posted on 02/12/2003 9:26:32 AM PST by pabianice
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Contact Information:
Thomas Reilley
Lord High Attorney General of Massachusetts
In the Service of HRH, King George III
One Ashburton Place
Boston, MA 02108-1698
Tel: (617) 727-2200
Fax: (413) 784-1244
1
posted on
02/12/2003 9:26:32 AM PST
by
pabianice
To: pabianice
Why not talk to your CO?
2
posted on
02/12/2003 9:32:11 AM PST
by
stuartcr
To: pabianice
Why not talk to your CO?
3
posted on
02/12/2003 9:32:56 AM PST
by
stuartcr
To: stuartcr
Dr. Greco will give birth to his own fifth child before he gets a pistol permit for a gun in MA. No way, no how.
Sorry, Doc, but thanks for your service.
4
posted on
02/12/2003 9:37:42 AM PST
by
thegreatbeast
(Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
To: pabianice
In the Service of HRH, King George III No gun control under George III until the revolution actually began. Taxes were lower under George III then George of Mount Vernon. I say bring back the Hanoverians down with Democracy.
5
posted on
02/12/2003 9:44:04 AM PST
by
weikel
(Anti democratic right of Atilla reactionary objectivist tory monarchist 4eva)
To: thegreatbeast
And what's amazing is - those pinko lefty anti-gun liberals scream that the 2nd Amendment was to protect the Militia - what is a reservist?
To: bang_list
PRM bump.
7
posted on
02/12/2003 9:48:24 AM PST
by
Fixit
(http://comedian.blogspot.com)
To: thegreatbeast
Don't they have any ranges in Mass where he can rent a weapon and practice?
8
posted on
02/12/2003 9:49:17 AM PST
by
stuartcr
To: thegreatbeast
Dr. Greco will give birth to his own fifth child before he gets a pistol permit for a gun in MA. No way, no how. Sorry, Doc, but thanks for your service.It's not getting a permit that's his problem. It's that he can not buy/own a Beretta 9mm in Massachusetts. Thus he can not practice to become proficient with the side arm that will be issued to him by the U.S. Government when he is activated.
For those of you who are not familiar with the Massachusetts gun laws:
9
posted on
02/12/2003 9:54:53 AM PST
by
Prolix
To: pabianice
Just a question. Isn't there a Geneva restriction on medical personnel and weapons. I seem to recall that a G.I carrying Geneva I.D. as medical non combatant could not bear arms. Have the U.S. Armed Forces abandoned this policy. Making no judgement here, just seeking info.
To: *bang_list
bang . . .
To: xkaydet65
I was in a mobile radar unit (USAF) in Germany back in the late 80's and our medics carried an M-16.
To: pabianice
Aides in both offices assured me that it was not the intent of any of their legislation to prevent a reservist from getting necessary training.Well, they have a point, Doc.
The intent of their legislation is to prevent any citizen from getting neccessary training - much less owning any weapon which could conceivably threaten their power and perks.
Too bad, buddy. You can feel free to go and defend us 7,000 miles away, but you won't be allowed to defend yourself anywhere around here!
13
posted on
02/12/2003 10:09:20 AM PST
by
Gritty
To: pabianice
Lord High Attorney General of Massachusetts What an amazing title for our Democratic Republic.
To: Prolix
What do you mean? Is the Commonwealth saying this is one of those "unsafe" weapons? Otherwise it does devolve to the Doctor not being able to get a permit of some kind.
15
posted on
02/12/2003 10:13:03 AM PST
by
thegreatbeast
(Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
To: pabianice
As an officer, the navy expects me to know what to do to prepare myself for my job when I am mobilized Obviously all reservists need to move to another State and the Defense Department needs to begin closing all military bases in MA.
E-Mail Rummy's Office. Someone there is more likely to do something than anyone else is. If you have not yet been mobilized, I don't see how this could be considered going around your chain of command, especially since it is a political matter that is beyond the authority of anyone lower on the chain of command.
To: TheBattman
Excellent! You, sir, get a gold star. Excellent point!
17
posted on
02/12/2003 10:14:39 AM PST
by
thegreatbeast
(Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
To: Jack Black
"Lord High Attorney General of Massachusetts"
While I'm sure this title was confered in sarcasm, our pols do indeed think they are Lords and Kings, untouchable by the laws that govern the "common people".
18
posted on
02/12/2003 10:19:23 AM PST
by
philetus
(Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get)
To: Jack Black
This whole mess is courtesy of the warped Left-wing philosophy that argues that the best way to be disarming is to be disarmed.
After all, they reason,
if you pose no threat, then no-one will ever want to visit harm upon you! Of course, if you refuse to be the "perfect victim," then they paint you as some sort of neanderthal who should be vilified upon the altar of Political Correctness. (Nevermind your Constitutional Right to Keep and Bear Arms, dear Citizen. We know what's best for you!)
Related reading on the subject: The Harm in Being Harmless.
-Jay
19
posted on
02/12/2003 10:20:03 AM PST
by
Jay D. Dyson
(I have no sense of diplomacy. I consider that to be a character asset.)
To: pabianice
"why our nation would issue a side arm that our Attorney General would define as unsafe"
Because the AG of Mass. is an idiot and would classify a toy gun as 'unsafe.'
20
posted on
02/12/2003 10:28:26 AM PST
by
MEGoody
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson