Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Early Water on Earth
Geotimes ^ | February 2003 | Salma Monani

Posted on 02/09/2003 4:22:57 PM PST by CalConservative

Isotope geochemistry
Early water on Earth

Geologists have long thought that Earth’s first 500 million years were as hot as Hades, dubbing this time frame the Hadean. The high temperatures would have prevented liquid water from condensing on the surface. But new findings on zircon grains, Earth’s oldest known terrestrial materials, suggest that the Hadean might have hosted liquid water.

Recovered from the metamorphosed sediments of the Jack Hills in western Australia, the zircon grains are dated to be more than 4 billion years old and are the only geological evidence available to provide insight into the first 500 million years of Earth’s history.

“This period is also considered the dark ages of the Earth because there are no known rocks that have been preserved,” says John Valley from the University of Wisconsin-Madison, lead investigator in the Jack Hills zircon research. Presenting at the Geological Society of America’s annual meeting in Denver last October, Valley and his colleagues suggest geochemical clues in the zircons provide the surprising news that early Earth was cool enough for liquid water to exist.

Eranondoo Hill in the Jack Hills of western Australia contains zircon grains as old as 4.4 billion years. A team led by John Valley of the University of Wisconsin-Madison (left) found surprising clues in the grains. Also pictured are Aaron Cavosie of the University of Wisconsin-Madison and Simon Wilde of Curtin University. Photo by David Valley.

In the late 1990s, Valley and his co-workers realized that zircons accurately preserve their original oxygen isotope values, and they decided to document zircons through all of geological time. This realization prompted their discovery of the oldest Jack Hills zircon, a 4.4-billion-year-old detrital grain. The Hadean hypothesis holds that Earth had not yet developed any source materials other than molten magma generated from the interior or from a meteorite bombardment. When the team first placed the grain on the ion microprobe, they expected it to have oxygen isotope ratios of a zircon crystallized in a rock that would in turn have mantle geochemical signatures. But the values of the grain’s oxygen isotopes were much higher than they expected.

“Rocks that have zircons with higher oxygen isotope values indicate a source that has interacted with water at low temperatures,” says Aaron Cavosie, also from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. The new isotope values have two implications, Cavosie says. First, they suggest that water existed as early as 4.4 billion years ago. Because water is a prerequisite for life, this research potentially pushes back the time that life could have originated. Prior to this research, the first known rock evidence for water on Earth was from the Isua metasediments in Greenland, which date to 3.8 billion years ago (Geotimes, July 2002).

Second, the data suggest that the zircons formed in a source rock that was contaminated with material that had interacted with water at low temperatures — that is, rock close to the surface. The trace element geochemistry and quartz inclusions of the zircons corroborate the oxygen isotope data, and point to an evolved rock, much like a granite, indicating that continental crust probably existed on early Earth.

“These are the first real data that suggest that there was supracrustal material that early on Earth,” says co-author William Peck of Colgate University. “In addition, the possibility of liquid water — and perhaps oceans — this early in the planet’s formation is really exciting. It has implications for when catastrophic bombardment of the Earth by meteorites likely waned.” Meteorite bombardments are heat sources, so the idea that early Earth was cool enough for water raises questions regarding the timing and intensity of bombardments.

Alex Halliday, a geochemist from the Institute of Isotope Geology and Mineral Resources in Zurich, suggests caution about the findings. “They are not being outrageous or even factually incorrect. It is just that there are inevitable, fundamental assumptions involved in scaling up a portion of a single grain of zircon to the existence of continents and oceans.”

Valley and his colleagues agree. “The cool early Earth hypothesis is controversial, and we are working very hard to test it,” Valley says. Whereas in 2001 they had only one zircon older than 4.3 billion years, they now have several, which they are using to test their interpretations.

The Jack Hills zircons are proving to be a treasure trove for understanding early Earth. “The most important aspect is that we now have an archive to work on, albeit limited,” Halliday says. “The past 10 years have seen major revisions in our understanding of the earliest Earth, and this field has been viewed as one of the most interesting and rewarding today in terms of significant discoveries.”

Salma Monani
Geotimes contributing writer


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: australia; creation; crevo; diamonds; evolution; godsgravesglyphs; hadean; jackhills; polishingpaste; thomasgold; whoops; zircon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: MissAmericanPie
A link for you:

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap010113.html

Note carefully the "line" stretched across the "heavens".
41 posted on 02/10/2003 7:34:27 AM PST by azhenfud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: MissAmericanPie
Sorry, but there are stone tablets that ARE MUCH older then any story in the bible.

The bible is only 1800 years old, and some of the stories comprising it are probably close to 5000 years old, but that is far from being the oldest book in existence.

If I remember rightly some of the earliest stories and tablets have been found in Mesopotamia, if you are going to worship based on age, those would be it. Better learn to read another language though, because I doubt there is a King James version.
42 posted on 02/10/2003 10:16:16 AM PST by Aric2000 (Are you on Grampa Dave's team? I am!! $5 a month is all it takes, come join!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: azhenfud
Thanks for the link and the scriptures, you tie things in very nicely.
43 posted on 02/10/2003 9:25:23 PM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

Diamonds Tell Story Of Earth’s Beginning
The Telegraph (UK) | 8-22-2007 | Roger Highfield
Posted on 08/22/2007 9:48:58 PM EDT by blam
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1885157/posts


44 posted on 11/03/2007 11:15:49 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Profile updated Monday, October 22, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CalConservative

· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic · subscribe ·

 
Gods
Graves
Glyphs
Note: this topic is from February 9, 2003 .

Blast from the Past.

Just adding to the catalog, not sending a general distribution.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.
GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother, and Ernest_at_the_Beach
 

·Dogpile · Archaeologica · LiveScience · Archaeology · Biblical Archaeology Society ·
· Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google ·
· The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists ·


45 posted on 01/22/2010 7:55:50 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Happy New Year! Freedom is Priceless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

It all boils down to what was the Sun doing 4.5 billion years ago. My guess is that the early Sun was still accumulating nebulaic gasses(even though it had just began it’s fusion reaction). Therefore it is possible that the early Earth had a weaker Star in the sky.

In addition, the nebulaic gases and particulates would still be in high concentrations, possibly high enough that much of the Sun’s solar radiation would have been absorbed before it reached Earth.

In addition Earth probably didn’t have as strong of a magnetic field to protect it from the Sun.

All this combined means the early Earth was not hot. It was likely very, very cold. Maybe even too cold for liquid water.


46 posted on 01/09/2012 9:02:25 AM PST by RC51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

Whoops! Earth’s Oldest ‘Diamonds’ Actually Polishing Grit
LiveScience | 1/3/2014 | Becky Oskin
Posted on 1/3/2014 5:26:38 PM by aimhigh
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3108059/posts


47 posted on 03/09/2019 10:19:35 PM PST by SunkenCiv (and btw -- https://www.gofundme.com/for-rotator-cuff-repair-surgery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson