castrating clinton

2.8.03 | Mia T

[Mia T]

castrating clinton

by Mia T, 2.8.03

 

To say that hillary clinton is 'polarizing' doesn't begin to capture the depth of the hate and completely overlooks its range.

clinton is despised not only by the right and the less middling 'middle,' but by a significant segment of the left, women included. Recall Fran Lebowitz's scathing comments during the senate campaign. On the left, Hitchens has put it best.

The range of the hate has been quantified by the Marist poll. 69% of voters nationwide don't want to see this woman run, EVER. No amount of spin will move those numbers, Oh, we will see virtual surreality pollster/media manipulation, but no movement in the real world.

People HATE her. It's that simple.

And 69% is the number before our efforts...

the strategy:

If the woman is manifestly unelectable. what's the problem, then? The problem, simply, is the insidious clinton corruption of, and control over, the electoral process.

We cannot depend on Bush releasing any damaging information. It can be concluded to an absolute certainty that the mephitic pair left office with a Bush trump card in hand.

It is my view that we must not wait for the clintons to make the first move. We must take out the trash NOW...A Senate en passant capture is THE MOVE. The woman is A SECURITY RISK. We must use that fact to oust her.

Should this tactic fail--or I fear--not even be implemented--it seems to me that the obvious global strategy would be saturating the media with this simple message:

AMERICA (& THE WORLD) CANNOT AFFORD ANOTHER CLINTON.

To this end, we must do the following:

• Explain that the president's raison d'etre is NATIONAL SECURITY--not a difficult sell in this post-9/11 world-- and that the clintons didn't merely fail utterly to protect us; they, in fact, increased our vulnerability.

• Demonstrate that clinton corruption and ineptitude and fecklessness and cowardice and essential stupidity and megalomania were the proximate cause of 9/11

• Demonstrate that the clintons failed utterly to confront terrorism in its incipient stage, when it was more easily eliminated.

• Explain Chinagate and how it endangers America, how our children and our grandchildren will be the clintons' ultimate victims.

 

play tape

• Explain the clinton-Carter mismanagement of Korea

• The clinon rapes. Get out all the info, including the Ford Building evidence.

•  Expose clinton's undemocratic refusal to confront opposition interviews, questioning, etc..To expose media complicity; insert stealth "Prumhomme" questioners in all clinton venues. clinton cannot survive the sunlight.

• Reopen the Ron Brown death. Blacks will leave her in droves once they understand what has happened.

• Exploit the web to bypass the media and get out the truth.

 

.

[Mia T]

The criminal clintons walking free is the evidence...which you refuse to address--hence my statement regarding your refusal.

[CyberAnt]

The only "evidence" is x42 walking free.

You must be kidding ...?? That is NO EVIDENCE of Bush doing or not doing anything - it's not even related.

Your "hypothesis" lacks any substance!

I think the refusal is on your part - because you refuse to believe Bush is not as crooked as x42.

[Mia T]

You are not helping your case, CyberAnt. Your assertions about MY view of Bush are becoming increasing ludicrous.

I presented the evidence/reasoning in detail in an earlier response to you. I am not going to repeat myself. The reasoning is really quite simple. A grade-school student with no training in logic should be able to follow it.

Go back and read it. If you are unable to follow this reasoning -- or unwilling to accept it -- I cannot help you any further.

I don't do online fisticuffs. Sorry.

[Mia T]

increasingly

[O6ret]

bump

[CyberAnt]

Well ... screaming at me in bold and larger type is not helping your case either. In fact, you don't have a case and you don't have any evidence. What you have are insinuations.

You claim that because Bush has not arrested and prosecuted x42, then x42 must be holding something over the head of Bush. That is your view, because that is what you said - and it is ludicrous.

That means you believe Bush is being BLACKMAILED by x42 - and if you are asserting this - then you are also claiming Bush is complying by not arresting x42. That means you're asserting our President is willingly allowing himself to be blackmailed.

You're trying to claim that because x42 is walking free - that is the evidence that Bush is complicit. How ignorant is that?

And ... for your information, I do not NEED YOUR HELP OR ASSISTANCE to understand a stupidly ignorant statement when I read it which insinuates my President is complicit in blackmail.

You have been throwing this stuff out for a long time, and nobody has ever bothered to call you on it. I have also noticed - no one has come to your defense. I find that really remarkable.

YOU started this fisticuffs when you made your ridiculous statement about President Bush.

[Mudboy Slim]

"I was referring to HER."

The HildaBeast's got bigger cjones than Slick Willie, I hear...MUD

[Mudboy Slim]

"I was referring to HER."

The HildaBeast's got bigger cajones than Slick Willie, I hear...MUD

DOHHH!!!

[Mudboy Slim]

"MiaT fairly rocks, eh?"

Oh yeah, I'm a big Mia T fan...MUD

[Mudboy Slim]

"The clintons' leverage is not (nonexistent) Bush cowardice; it is a son's love for his father. From this it follows that Bush won't release the information while the clintons are still alive."

Actually, I believe CyberAnt's got a good point here...I've always believed the FBI files have been a convenient excuse fer inaction since they became an issue. There's no way the RATS are sitting on a bunch of info that could destroy their political adversaries, especially George W. Bush or his father. If they've got it, they'd use it fer political gain and wouldn't have the discipline to sit on it fer blackmail purposes.

I believe this mindset is in part due to the apparent unwillingness to go after Terry McAuliffe for his Global Crossing Felonies, since Global Crossing also paid Dubyuh's Daddy his speaking fee in stock options. There's a HUGE difference between Bush, Sr. one-time relationship with the GC crooks and all the linkages and preferential government treatment enjoyed by Global Crossing while Clinton/McAuliffe controlled the Oval Office. Unless it can be established that Global Crossing was getting preferential treatment in FL and TX while Bush's boys were governors there, there is no quid pro quo other than Bush, Sr. speaking and Bush, Sr. receiving stock. That ain't illegal and it can be explained to the Sheeple clearly enuff that it would cause Dubyuh no loss in prestige, IMHO.

That excuse excluded, I still can't understand why Ashcroft refuses to PROSECUTE The ClintonCadre'sCorruption!! I'm sure it ain't the highest priority fer Dubyuh just now, but it had better be before November '04 or else Dubyuh's going to appear complicit in Clinton's Corruption and resulting coverup and excuses like the "DaddyBush's Corrupt" will gain increasing credence in folks' minds.

FReegards...MUD

[Mudboy Slim]

"...it is not inconceivable that the lovely couple was able to dig up something that would embarrass Bush 41."

That's not inconceivable at all, but if the ClintonSCUM found it, they wouldda already used it, IMHO.

"While Bush 43 wouldn't cower if personally threatened, he would, I believe, act to protect his father."

Bush, Sr.'s an EX-pilot who got shot down over the Pacific, so I reckon he can protect hisself. I've been quite bothered by the attorney General's lack of initiative vis a vis the RAMPANT Clinton Corruption, too, however, I disagree that it is linked to some innate fear of Blackmail regarding Dubyuh's daddy. IMHO, of course.

FReegards...MUD

[Mia T]

They may have already used it. They aren't indicted, are they?

[Mia T]

"The clintons' leverage is not (nonexistent) Bush cowardice; it is a son's love for his father. From this it follows that Bush won't release the information while the clintons are still alive."

That is MY comment.

[Mudboy Slim]

"I do not believe that Bush 43 would ever hide information about x42 just to keep the clintons from embarassing his father."

What is yer conjecture as to the lack of progress in prosecuting the plethora of felonies committed by the RATS during Clinton's term? My personal belief is that it's some misguided thought that busting Bubba would demean the Presidency; however, I believe Bubba's already demeaned the Presidency and the Bush Administration is only compounding the damage by failing to hold the RATS accountable up to this point.

FReegards...MUD

[Fiddlstix]

Bump

[Mia T]

I agree that bush 41 can fend for himself. But Dubya is a loving son whose instincts are to protect those he loves.

[Mudboy Slim]

"If, on the other hand, the clintons are not indicted, will you agree that some sort of "arrangement" did, in fact, take place?"

If Slick Willie and the HildaBeast are not held accountable for their crimes by the DoJ, it'll leave an indelible stain on the second Bush Presidency, IMHO!! The Executive Branch is statutorily-required to Execute the Laws legislated by Congress, laws that Bill Clinton has clearly and inarguably violated...if Ashcroft--and, by extension, Dubyuh--fail to act, SHAME ON DUBYUH!!

FReegards...MUD

[CyberCowboy777]

Bump!

[Mia T]

I agree with you. Bush sees prosecuting the clintons as demeaning to the office.

I do see a scenario for prosecution, however. Bush will determine that post-9/11, the clintons' effort to retake the white house constitutes a clear and present danger. He will finally indict them to save this country from clinton, the sequel, which it could never survive...

[Mudboy Slim]

"...your comment that our President was willingly going along with not prosecuting x42 because x42 holds something over Bush's head - well ... that's way over the top, and such an outrageous lie!"

While I am sure you and I share a mutual respect fer Dubyuh, it would require you to have a lot more information than I have for you to call Mia T's assertion a "LIE." It's an opinion that you and I don't share, but it's impossible to call it a "LIE" unless we were absolutely certain that Bush's Daddy is 100% clean and Dubyuh was 100% unwilling to protect his father from Clinton skulduggery. It doesn't seem to fit my perception of our current POTUS's character, but no matter how well-read I try to be, none of us can know everything that happens behind Oval Office walls.

Just my humble opinion...MUD