Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Air Force imagery confirms Columbia wing damaged (with picture)
Space Flght Now ^ | 7 Feb 03 | CRAIG COVAULT

Posted on 02/07/2003 4:08:42 PM PST by Lokibob

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181 next last
The picture, finally.
1 posted on 02/07/2003 4:08:42 PM PST by Lokibob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lokibob
this does nothing but create more questions.
2 posted on 02/07/2003 4:11:22 PM PST by yonif
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lokibob
Well, that makes everything perfectly clear. I don't have any more questions. Case closed.

Next!
3 posted on 02/07/2003 4:11:57 PM PST by Chad Fairbanks (We've got, you know, armadillos in our trousers. I mean, it's really quite frightening.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lokibob
The picture, finally.

Good job getting that.

The damage looks huge.

4 posted on 02/07/2003 4:13:33 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lokibob
What the heck is that? Hi-res my butt, looks more like a thermal image than RGB.
5 posted on 02/07/2003 4:14:07 PM PST by mikenola
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lokibob
THAT is the picture that all this fuss has been about???

Yeesh.
6 posted on 02/07/2003 4:14:58 PM PST by Ramius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikenola
What the heck is that?

I dont know, but I think I'm afraid to ask...

7 posted on 02/07/2003 4:15:27 PM PST by Chad Fairbanks (We've got, you know, armadillos in our trousers. I mean, it's really quite frightening.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lokibob
Perhaps we should all look up the word "confirm" in the dictionary....

:)
8 posted on 02/07/2003 4:18:06 PM PST by TheLooseThread
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lokibob
The proportions look really strange on that photo. For one thing, the front of the orbiter looks more slender and "pointier" than the blunt nose of the shuttle, and the wingtips don't look right either.
9 posted on 02/07/2003 4:20:06 PM PST by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yonif
this does nothing but create more questions.

Yep .. like what the heck is it

10 posted on 02/07/2003 4:20:32 PM PST by Mo1 (I Hate The Party of Bill Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mikenola
What the heck is that? Hi-res my butt, looks more like a thermal image than RGB.

That is what hi-res looks like when the object being imaged is more than 200,000 feet up above you. If you are thinking you have seen a better close-up photo somewhere of the re-entering shuttle, then you are mistaken. This is as good as it gets.

11 posted on 02/07/2003 4:20:44 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty" not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lokibob
I agree. Finally a picture. That Kalifornia astronomer that won't release his pics of the shuttle makes me want to jack-slap him.
12 posted on 02/07/2003 4:21:22 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheLooseThread
Aside from the fact this photo looks like it would fit in quite well with that one sequence in the "Austin Powers" movies (y'all know what I'm talking about), how in the world does anybody see "damage" here? Am I just missing something obvious?
13 posted on 02/07/2003 4:21:25 PM PST by wizzler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lokibob
Chick this thread out for a very good discussion.
14 posted on 02/07/2003 4:22:06 PM PST by Budge (God Bless FReepers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lokibob
Did they degrade the picture before releasing it?
15 posted on 02/07/2003 4:23:39 PM PST by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wizzler
Aside from the fact this photo looks like it would fit in quite well with that one sequence in the "Austin Powers" movies (y'all know what I'm talking about),

Oh, good, glad I'm not the only one...

16 posted on 02/07/2003 4:23:56 PM PST by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mikenola
What the heck is that? Hi-res my butt, looks more like a thermal image than RGB.

I used to make better images than that on my 286 computer using Windows Paint.

That looks like a two-pixel distortion.

17 posted on 02/07/2003 4:24:25 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lokibob
picture bump
18 posted on 02/07/2003 4:24:43 PM PST by bribriagain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lokibob
The damage isn't next to the fuselage like I heard. With the angle of the photographic perspective, it looks to be a ways away from the fuselage.
19 posted on 02/07/2003 4:24:56 PM PST by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wizzler
Yes, you are missing something obvious.
20 posted on 02/07/2003 4:25:07 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson