Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Powell Speech to UN Live Thread

Posted on 02/05/2003 6:36:41 AM PST by Support Free Republic

Might as well start up the live thread. Speech starts at 10:30 EST (scheduled), which is within the hour.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,721-1,7401,741-1,7601,761-1,780 ... 2,541-2,560 next last
To: Momto2
Well I'm getting my kids out of the gov't. induction centers at the end of this year. When they join me at Ft. Riley, they'll be going to DoD schools. Last vestiage of a decent public school system left in this country.
1,741 posted on 02/05/2003 9:50:58 AM PST by txradioguy (Doing my part to keep the country free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1711 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
A fitting end to Saddam:

The US locks him into one of his labs and given his fear of germs, expose him to one of his more choice bio weapons. Let him die a long, slow agonizing death.
1,742 posted on 02/05/2003 9:51:06 AM PST by Humidston (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1700 | View Replies]

To: abnegation
I wondered that very same thing!! heh heh
1,743 posted on 02/05/2003 9:51:28 AM PST by prairiebreeze ("We won't deny, ignore or pass our problems along to other Presidents" --GWBush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1644 | View Replies]

To: BlueLancer
"I guess I can't think of ANYTHING that Cameroon is known for."

They have a decent soccer team.

1,744 posted on 02/05/2003 9:51:29 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1732 | View Replies]

To: OneLoyalAmerican
From some of the Replies from the UN, Sounds like no one even listened. People claim to be pro "Human rights" and not even Human testing cause them to bat an eye lash, I'm horrified at the lack of outrage in this UN council by many.
1,745 posted on 02/05/2003 9:51:29 AM PST by Japedo (Live Free or Die Trying)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1715 | View Replies]

To: cactusSharp
Are you sure Williams didn't say..."On this the first Wed-nes-day of the second month of the year 2003...blah blah blah."

He is a himbo. I love that NBC is selling out to him, they'll be losig market share left and right, he's as deep as a puddle on a pool table.

1,746 posted on 02/05/2003 9:51:35 AM PST by Benrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1580 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Yeah, and the "Maginot Line" could hold back the Germans

Oh OUCH !! That wasn't nice at all ! (imagine saying it with a lisping French accent)

1,747 posted on 02/05/2003 9:51:37 AM PST by twyn1 (God Bless America !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1731 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
I flipped onto the 700 Club a few weeks back to hear former UN weapons inspector Bob Tierney talking about the French. He said that they used to leak the day's list of inspection sites to the Iraqis because they had oil agreements that gave them rights to oil the day after sanctions were dropped, or something (trusting Saddam, unwise). Mr. Tierney said that it got so bad they'd write up two lists for the day and give a false list to the French. (^;

Friday Dec. 6, 2002; 11:05 a.m. EST

Saddam Has Nukes, Ex-Weapons Inspector Says

A former U.N. weapons inspector who was renowned for his ability to ferret out Iraqi weapons violations during the late 1990's charged point blank on Thursday that Saddam Hussein now has nuclear weapons.

"I have no doubt that he has nukes," Bill Tierney told nationally syndicated radio host Sean Hannity.

"He's going to use non-persistent chemicals against his own people to put down an insurrection," the ace inspector predicted, before adding chillingly, "He'll use bio and nukes against us."

Stunned by the revelation, the radio host pressed for confirmation:

HANNITY: You have no doubt that he has nukes? Or he's close (to getting them)?

TIERNEY: I have no doubt that he has nukes.

HANNITY: You think he has nuclear weapons.

TIERNEY: Yes.

HANNITY: Why are you the only (former weapons inspector) saying that?

TIERNEY: Well, there's a few more. One reason why is, during the 90's in the intelligence community, there was just a pathological risk aversion. The reason being was that our president at the time, Bill Clinton, fundamentally changed the purpose of the United States military from fighting and winning wars to crisis management and keeping his poll numbers up.

Now, if you're not out to win, there's no need to take risks. And so what you found is people being very guarded about everything, every kind of assessment you could make. (End of Excerpt)

Before he ran afoul of the system Tierney had built a powerful reputation for credibility, prompting the U.N. to personally recruit him in 1996 for the task of inspecting some of Saddam's most sensitive suspected weapons facilities.

But he was forced to resign two years later amidst charges he was spying for the U.S. Tierney now says he was locked out for doing what he figured was his job - giving the Pentagon targets for military action.

"What I did was identified those people who have sold their souls to keep Saddam in power. I made it my goal to find every place where they are," Tierney told the London's Daily Mirror in October.

Still, his aggressive pursuit of Saddam's weapons violations won him more than a few fans at U.S. Central Command, where Tierney's boss, Army Brig. Gen. Keith Alexander, wrote in one of his job evaluations: "His ability to consistently seek and identify priority target intelligence information is uncanny and is the characteristic that separates him from his contemporaries."

Tierney told Hannity that a 1997 inspection he attempted to conduct at Saddam's Jabal Makhul presidential palace lead him to suspect that the Iraqi dictator already had the bomb.

"Certain things convinced me that they had proscribed items at this presidential site. That led to the inspection in September 1997 where we were locked out. There was something about that. The just came up and said, 'There will be no inspection. Good Day.' And they walked off."

Tierney said the rebuff was "completely different" from other inspections of sensitive sites, where some sort of compromise was always worked out.

Another sign of sinister activity: As Tierney and his team were being turned away, a U.N. helicopter attempting to overfly Jabal Makhul nearly crashed when an Iraqi official on board lunged at the controls.

"That was a distraction to keep that helicopter from going over to the other side of the mountain to see what they were doing" at the facility, said Tierney.

He described Jabal Makhul as a "gigantic" complex of warehouses and underground tunnels, before noting that last year the London Times reported Saddam was storing nuclear weapons in bunkers in and around the Hamrin Mountains.

"There is only one heavily guarded place in the Hamrin Mountains," Tierney told Hannity. "And that's where we were, Jabal Makhul."

Still, despite efforts by Iraqi officials to keep inspectors away from Jabal Makhul, U.N. officials continued to give Saddam the benefit of the doubt, he complained.

"If you had ambiguous reporting; it could mean he has the nukes, it could mean that he doesn't." he said. "Normally the call would be, 'Oh well, that doesn't confirm so therefore he's still developing. He doesn't have it,'" Tierney said he was told.

The ex-inspector predicted that Saddam would likely use his nukes, "maybe (in) Israel, maybe here."

Calling the current inspections "a complete total waste of time," Tierney warned, "You have a leader of a country who's bent on stealing, killing and destroying. And it is time to resolve the issue and solve it. Crisis management is over."

"There's way too much at stake," he added. "We could lose millions more of our citizens unless we wake up and take care of this."


1,748 posted on 02/05/2003 9:51:43 AM PST by Ragtime Cowgirl (Scott Ritter, Saddam apologist, American media Golden Boy. Bob Tierney - hero - press ignores.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1673 | View Replies]

To: Dog
He wants a permanment UN presence in Iraq.....LOL

Me too! How soon can we move UN HQ there from NY?

1,749 posted on 02/05/2003 9:51:44 AM PST by freedomcrusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1650 | View Replies]

To: Stefan Stackhouse
In some ways, I don't think this speech was even about convincing people, meaning those who presently remain unconvinced even in the mass of previously available information.

Seems to me this was:

1) Check that block - you want the UN thing, we did the UN thing. Now shut up.

2. To those of you who have been with us for some time: take courage, your support is for a cause that is just, a war that is necessary, a future that must be brought back from the brink.

3) The 20/20 hindsight of history will document the extraordinary lengths to which America went to be sure it exercised its awesome military might wisely.
1,750 posted on 02/05/2003 9:51:53 AM PST by fightinJAG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1468 | View Replies]

MSNBC Survey: "How'd Powell do?

http://www.msnbc.com/news/842500.asp


1,751 posted on 02/05/2003 9:52:06 AM PST by CyberCowboy777 (Extremism in the Pursuit of Liberty is no Vice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1701 | View Replies]

To: Dog
His case was so weak that the U.N. should consider suspending arms inspections. 3% We need to flog this 3%....LOL

Iraqi-Americans.

1,752 posted on 02/05/2003 9:52:24 AM PST by ez ("If this is not evil, then evil has no meaning." - GWB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1701 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
*Which country's talking head was that?*

CNN. Pollack maybe??--not sure about the name
1,753 posted on 02/05/2003 9:52:32 AM PST by prairiebreeze ("We won't deny, ignore or pass our problems along to other Presidents" --GWBush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1615 | View Replies]

To: justshe
Did you just see that little chat between Koffee and Blix?
1,754 posted on 02/05/2003 9:52:33 AM PST by Mo1 (I Hate The Party of Bill Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1733 | View Replies]

To: Helms
Right on.....
1,755 posted on 02/05/2003 9:52:44 AM PST by biss5577
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1714 | View Replies]

To: eastsider
LOL! Good one, east. But she's ours now. ;o)
1,756 posted on 02/05/2003 9:52:50 AM PST by al_c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1716 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
They have one of the largest Guinness breweries in Africa. ;)

This is off topic, but I sure wish I knew how to find Windhoek Lager here in the States.

1,757 posted on 02/05/2003 9:52:52 AM PST by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1721 | View Replies]

Comment #1,758 Removed by Moderator

To: Dog
He wants a permanment UN presence in Iraq.....LOL

Me too! How soon can we move UN HQ there from NY City?

1,759 posted on 02/05/2003 9:53:21 AM PST by freedomcrusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1650 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123
Ken Pollack is the author of the new book "The Threatening Storm," which VERY forcefully lays out the case for war NOW. It's huge and extremely detailed.
1,760 posted on 02/05/2003 9:53:24 AM PST by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1623 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,721-1,7401,741-1,7601,761-1,780 ... 2,541-2,560 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson