Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/05/2003 2:32:26 AM PST by KneelBeforeZod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
To: KneelBeforeZod
Very interesting

I would assume a lightning bolt could hit something moving at 12,500 MPH at 200,000 feet up ???

2 posted on 02/05/2003 2:42:08 AM PST by JZoback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KneelBeforeZod
Very interesting. I wonder why this news isn't covered by Fox or something.
3 posted on 02/05/2003 2:44:14 AM PST by bewildered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KneelBeforeZod
Where's the pic?

Purples and yellow tinges have been known to be caused by devloping and processing. I would not put any assumptions into it without seeing it, and have experts look at the negatives.

Otherwise it's worse than "three headed alien baby attacks Sweden" picture, considering no one has even seen it.
4 posted on 02/05/2003 2:50:27 AM PST by Rain-maker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KneelBeforeZod
Hmmm. A digital picture, and one he's willing to let a reporter look at, but not print.

I'll believe it when a) I see it, and b) Kodak takes a look at it and certifies it as being legit and not a Photoshop job.

6 posted on 02/05/2003 2:51:10 AM PST by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KneelBeforeZod
Is this going to be like that Israeli media picture of a damaged shuttle wing, that turned out to be a picture of the cargo bay?

Purple Fringing (Chromatic Aberrations) Nikon Coolpix Models

Good news, it looks as though the engineers at Nikon have finally got on top of the purple fringing problem. Some previous Coolpix models suffered from purple fringing (to differing degrees), the 4500 exhibits only the slightest hint of a fringe (nothing you would normally see). We have no way of knowing if this improvement has been made in the lens, coatings or software but sufficient to say it's a considerable step forward.

 
 
Artifacts and Highlights
For discerning photophiles, a new concern appeared with the release of the 2-megapixel generation of cameras: Those units, as well as the 2.5-and 3.3-megapixel products that followed, have had troubles with chromatic aberration -- purple fringe artifacts that show up in areas of extreme contrast. Though not always a problem in everyday snapshots, in outdoor shooting chromatic aberrations can be very distracting.

In our tests, both cameras produced chromatic aberrations similar to other cameras in their class, but neither camera seemed markedly worse than the other.

For most shooting situations, you probably won't notice a great deal of chromatic artifacts and fringes. Bright highlight areas -- such as backlit building or trees, or highlights off of highly reflective surfaces -- may show some purple or blue blooms. Unfortunately, it appears that for the time being, that's simply the case with this class of digital camera.

12 posted on 02/05/2003 3:13:21 AM PST by Rain-maker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KneelBeforeZod
It's too early in the morning for this. I thought the title read: Mysterious purple steak is shown hitting Canada.
16 posted on 02/05/2003 3:46:17 AM PST by Skooz (Tagline removed by moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KneelBeforeZod
See? The same CFR/Bilderberger/Trilateralists that shot down TWA 800 got Columbia too!

And they said I was paranoid...[/LSD]

20 posted on 02/05/2003 4:21:38 AM PST by Jarhead_22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KneelBeforeZod
Maybe it was HAARP.....hmmmmmm
21 posted on 02/05/2003 4:26:08 AM PST by thefoyboy (Always up for a good conspiracy...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KneelBeforeZod
Tin-foil hat alert!
26 posted on 02/05/2003 5:06:04 AM PST by jerod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KneelBeforeZod
Thank you so much for this follow-up post. I have been seriously wondering what happened to this man, what he saw and what he said.

I figure he has seen the last of his camera, the photograph and silence will result.


29 posted on 02/05/2003 5:16:38 AM PST by Spirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KneelBeforeZod
Very interesting. Hope we will be able to know the outcome of the investigation.
30 posted on 02/05/2003 5:29:50 AM PST by kassie (God Bless and Protect Our Military)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KneelBeforeZod
Rightly or wrongly, it will be explained away, as a hoax, bad camera with light infiltration, bad film, inept operator, maybe even space dust, experts always have a logical explanation.
35 posted on 02/05/2003 5:58:52 AM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KneelBeforeZod
Next thing we'll find out is that someone somewhere has snapped a picure with a telescopic lens that suggests Dr. Smith ('Lost In Space') was onboard the Columbia as well.
38 posted on 02/05/2003 6:41:59 AM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KneelBeforeZod
Don't know about this picture, but I heard today they think that possibly the shuttle hit some space junk possibly too. There's alot of it floating around up there.
42 posted on 02/05/2003 7:05:01 AM PST by b4its2late
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: onedoug
ping
57 posted on 02/05/2003 9:36:02 AM PST by windcliff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KneelBeforeZod
I keep hearing about this story. Where is the damn picture?
61 posted on 02/05/2003 4:46:52 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KneelBeforeZod
interesting...
63 posted on 02/05/2003 6:41:17 PM PST by yonif
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KneelBeforeZod
hm... And here I was just about to post a pool / poll for how long it would be before the DU morons start speculating that Bush had ordered the Columbia shot down in order to "divert attention" from their "burgeoning anti-War majority." With this, I'd say it's sure to have already happened.
65 posted on 02/05/2003 7:29:09 PM PST by Objective Reality
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KneelBeforeZod
bump
69 posted on 02/05/2003 8:19:53 PM PST by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KneelBeforeZod; DoughtyOne
Interesting. Did you see this, Doughty One?

From Ez's post on this thread:

"Military specialists in Beijing, adds Tai Yang Bao, believe production of the high-tech weapons will begin soon. The new weapons will include supersonic bombers, extra-long-range modified anti-warship missiles, sky-wave and ground-wave over-the-horizon radars, as well as tactical air defense laser weapons and shore-to-warship laser cannon weapons."

Maybe my tinfoil hat was not on too tight after all.

76 posted on 02/06/2003 4:49:44 AM PST by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson