Skip to comments.
Long-range camera footage shows foam insulation striking the shuttle's left wing during launch.
Spaceflight Now ^
| 02/03/03
| KSC ICE & Devris Team
Posted on 02/03/2003 10:34:36 AM PST by Fury
Click on the multimedia clip:
http://qs240.pair.com/sfnvideo/sts107/030203e212_qt.html
It is a much better sequence of debris that appears to travel on the underside of the left wing.
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: nasacolumbia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
1
posted on
02/03/2003 10:34:36 AM PST
by
Fury
To: Fury
It is a much better sequence should be:
It is a much better video sequence of the debris
2
posted on
02/03/2003 10:37:34 AM PST
by
Fury
To: Fury
That's good video footage, thanks. If tiles are as fragile as they say, I think a chunk of just about anything hitting at that speed and spraying like that must have the potential to do some serious damage if it hits the right spot.
To: Fury
I wish it had merely travelled under the wing. The debris seemed to initially waver between going over or under, and then went under and took a huge divot out of the wing tiles.
To: Fury
Yep; thanks.
To: Dialup Llama
Looks like maybe two pieces, one going past the wing, one actually hitting it?
To: KellyAdmirer
In watching the video, it appears the debris which traveled under the left wing of the shuttle was not in the same state (smaller pieces) as it was prior to traveling on the underside of the left wing (a solid piece or pieces).
7
posted on
02/03/2003 10:46:43 AM PST
by
Fury
To: snopercod
Bump...
8
posted on
02/03/2003 10:47:23 AM PST
by
Fury
To: Fury
Does anybody know what this "insulating foam" is made of? I have ben wondering how hard this material might be.
9
posted on
02/03/2003 10:52:05 AM PST
by
MJM59
To: MJM59
I've seen some different threads on FR concerning the composition of the foam. I'll if I can find...
10
posted on
02/03/2003 10:54:04 AM PST
by
Fury
To: Fury
Bump
11
posted on
02/03/2003 10:54:23 AM PST
by
HumanaeVitae
(If the Constitution is a "Living Document", does anyone have his phone number? Address? Anyone?)
To: Fury
12
posted on
02/03/2003 10:54:50 AM PST
by
South40
To: KellyAdmirer
The shuttle has landed, though, in the past, with several tiles damaged.
I expect that there are certain tiles that are more critical than others - perhaps it was one of these that was hit.
13
posted on
02/03/2003 10:55:23 AM PST
by
jdege
To: Fury
Thanks. Good link
To: Pete-R-Bilt
video ping.
15
posted on
02/03/2003 11:00:41 AM PST
by
glock rocks
(remember -- only you can prevent fundraisers. donate early. donate often.)
To: All
Much clearer photos at the following:
http://www.spaceflightnow.com/shuttle/sts107/030203analysis/
Spaceflight Now has had very good coverage thus far
16
posted on
02/03/2003 11:01:52 AM PST
by
Fury
To: Fury
17
posted on
02/03/2003 11:02:44 AM PST
by
1Old Pro
To: Fury
From the article:
An analysis by NASA engineers while Columbia was still in orbit, however, concludes that while the impact and resulting heat stress could have caused structural damage in the immediate area, it would not have led to a loss of the vehicle. The analysis, or at least this summarization of it, was dated Jan. 28 - the 17th anniversary of the 1986 Challenger disaster.
The engineers assumed the debris was foam insulation and studied possible damage scenarios based on the visible trajectory of the foam.
Damage to the reinforced carbon-carbon composite insulation on the leading edge of the wing would have been limited to "coating only and have no mission impact," the update said.
But impact on the black thermal protection tiles on the belly of the orbiter had the potential "for a large damage area to the tile."
A thermal analysis was performed to determine the implications of such damage assuming various levels of damage, including multiple tiles missing over an area measuring roughly 7 by 30 inches.
"These thermal analyses indicate possible localized structural damage but no burn-through and no safety of flight issue," the status report concluded.
Spaceflight Now
18
posted on
02/03/2003 11:03:09 AM PST
by
Budge
(God Bless FReepers!)
To: #3Fan
Thought you might want to see this clip.
19
posted on
02/03/2003 11:05:01 AM PST
by
Jael
To: 1Old Pro
Of course, no way for the engineers to be 100% sure on what they concluded was no major damage to Columbia. However, a reasonable statement is that the falling debris may be somehow be linked to the problems with Columbia. I'm not trying to be a fence-sitter, just very guarded with the limited observations I've made and the reports that have been read.
20
posted on
02/03/2003 11:06:06 AM PST
by
Fury
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson