Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/03/2003 10:34:36 AM PST by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Fury
It is a much better sequence

should be:

It is a much better video sequence of the debris

2 posted on 02/03/2003 10:37:34 AM PST by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fury
I wish it had merely travelled under the wing. The debris seemed to initially waver between going over or under, and then went under and took a huge divot out of the wing tiles.
4 posted on 02/03/2003 10:43:28 AM PST by Dialup Llama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fury
Yep; thanks.
5 posted on 02/03/2003 10:43:56 AM PST by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: snopercod
Bump...
8 posted on 02/03/2003 10:47:23 AM PST by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fury
Does anybody know what this "insulating foam" is made of? I have ben wondering how hard this material might be.
9 posted on 02/03/2003 10:52:05 AM PST by MJM59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fury
Same thing
12 posted on 02/03/2003 10:54:50 AM PST by South40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fury
Thanks. Good link
14 posted on 02/03/2003 11:00:06 AM PST by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pete-R-Bilt
video ping.
15 posted on 02/03/2003 11:00:41 AM PST by glock rocks (remember -- only you can prevent fundraisers. donate early. donate often.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Much clearer photos at the following:

http://www.spaceflightnow.com/shuttle/sts107/030203analysis/

Spaceflight Now has had very good coverage thus far

16 posted on 02/03/2003 11:01:52 AM PST by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fury
First NASA says it was no big deal. Now they are "focusing" on this as a likely cause....go figure.

YOU ARE A REPORTER. What Question would you ask Sean O'Keefe about the shuttle tragedy-

17 posted on 02/03/2003 11:02:44 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: #3Fan
Thought you might want to see this clip.
19 posted on 02/03/2003 11:05:01 AM PST by Jael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fury
Did anyone else notice something I noticed when replaying the clip over and over? The attitude of Columbia distinctly jumps to the right in the frame right after impact (the frame where a spray of disintegrated material appears below the left wing).

If I am right, then the force applied to Columbia by the foam impact must have been significant to shove Columbia over even a couple of feet from its previous trajectory.

35 posted on 02/03/2003 11:29:08 AM PST by stayout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fury
Looked more like a large chunk of ice than it did foam as it bounced off the tank first and split into two pieces which struck the left wing near the wheel well area. A 50 pound chunk of ice at Mach 3 would do a lot of damage to the tiles and landing gear door.
42 posted on 02/03/2003 11:48:59 AM PST by Mat_Helm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson