To: _Jim
Actually, that's not the impression I got from what he said; I thought he meant he had SEEN those reports and they were going to LOOK in the areas where the people say that they "saw" something.......like they were going to prove that it didn't happen.
349 posted on
02/03/2003 2:36:24 PM PST by
Howlin
To: Howlin
Howlin you are 100% correct about what he said about those people west of Texas!
358 posted on
02/03/2003 2:38:42 PM PST by
PhiKapMom
(Bush/Cheney 2004)
To: Howlin
... he even mentioned an example - that if something were found in CA it would nail it down (the event began) for sure
- THEN he talked about the fact that the *tiles* are numbered
- a cinch for knowing where it came off ...
You miss that part?
361 posted on
02/03/2003 2:40:59 PM PST by
_Jim
(//NASA has a better safety record than NASCAR\\)
To: Howlin
Actually, that's not the impression I got from what he said; I thought he meant he had SEEN those reports and they were going to LOOK in the areas where the people say that they "saw" something.......like they were going to prove that it didn't happen. I get the opposite impression. Not that I've been listening all that closely, typing, etc. gets in the way! But I am pretty sure his technical comments indicate interest in events over CA, i.e., he is very open to the idea that something happened over CA that was anomolous, and possibly relevant to the eventual demise of the Columbia.
371 posted on
02/03/2003 2:45:39 PM PST by
Cboldt
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson