Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA Press Conference LIVE THREAD
Fox, CNN, networks, NASA TV | February 2, 2003 | NASA

Posted on 02/02/2003 2:00:17 PM PST by snopercod

Any time now...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: nasa; sts107
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 581-585 next last
To: Braak
That guy bob was a complete weanie and had no value added.
61 posted on 02/02/2003 2:30:25 PM PST by fooman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: fooman
I don't see how using one set of materials or another would've saved these folks. They had a better chance of surviving the shuttle hitting the control tower at KSC during landing.
62 posted on 02/02/2003 2:30:27 PM PST by Poohbah (Beware the fury of a patient man -- John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Braak
I hate to ask, but is it possible that the computer had a problem?

Probably not. If there was a burn-through event on the left side (that's my working assumption), then there would have been increasingly damaging drag on the left side of the orbiter. The computers would undoubtedly have detected and compensated for this to a point. Once the left wing became unusable, the computers would have had nothing left to work with -- overcompensation or not, the corrections probably kept the crew alive for a few seconds more, FWIW.

P.S. - whatever the state of safety in NASA, this computer software is THE MOST thoroughly protected, managed, and tested computer programs on earth. Simulations like this have undoubtedly been run hundreds or thousands of times. While the computers could have failed, the FCS software most likely did not.

63 posted on 02/02/2003 2:30:29 PM PST by alancarp (hindsight is 20/20, but useless at a funeral)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
One of the optical engineers on FR debunked that video yesterday as an image of the camera shutter...no way the camera could have resolved the shuttle from 200k feet...
64 posted on 02/02/2003 2:30:34 PM PST by Rafterman1 (France! For sale, cheap!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Braak
Darn double posts, was trying to say "Feel bad for the ISS guys, they have a long four months ahead of them."
65 posted on 02/02/2003 2:30:41 PM PST by Braak (Democrats...always on the wrong side of history...since 1945.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
Please don't take what I said as a critiism, it's just yesterday they kept saying "off scale low" and I don't remember them saying clearly that there was a heat problem.
66 posted on 02/02/2003 2:30:52 PM PST by djf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
The drag increase on the left wing seems to have been captured on that WFAA video....
67 posted on 02/02/2003 2:31:11 PM PST by Dog ( STS 107......They have slipped the surly bonds of earth..........to touch the face of God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
That video does not show the shuttle flying sideways, the shape is caused by artifacts from an out of focus point source of light in the video camera.
68 posted on 02/02/2003 2:31:31 PM PST by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: steveo
Yes, when I public speak(not that I am that great), I DO have something useful to say.
69 posted on 02/02/2003 2:31:51 PM PST by fooman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Budge
Perhaps an additional 32 secs of info available on NASA computers after loss of signal.

I don't understand this. How did they get additional data after loss of communication??? Is this from a separate low frequency channel?

70 posted on 02/02/2003 2:32:14 PM PST by mikegi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
video showing the Shuttle flying sideways just before the breakup.

I have seen that video over and over and had just about convinced myself that I was not seeing it fly sideways. Is that what you saw too?

71 posted on 02/02/2003 2:32:19 PM PST by Budge (God Bless FReepers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Rafterman1
>>...bond-line temperature (where the wing joins the fuselage?) ...<<

I believe that measurement is taken where the Thermal Protection System (tiles) bond with the orbiter surfaces. I could be wrong.

72 posted on 02/02/2003 2:32:22 PM PST by FReepaholic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: djf
Yesterday they only had real time data, since then they have been looking at stopped data. The final process of break out of thousands of sensors will take weeks.
73 posted on 02/02/2003 2:33:18 PM PST by Don Munn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
No mention of the WFAA video showing the Shuttle flying sideways just before the breakup. I hope some reporter asks.

The shuttle was over 40 miles away from the camera; the camera lens wasn't long enough to get a detailed image at this range. You couldn't establish that it actually was flying sideways.

74 posted on 02/02/2003 2:33:41 PM PST by Poohbah (Beware the fury of a patient man -- John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

Comment #75 Removed by Moderator

To: Braak
Gene Gleason Ch 7 Los Angeles: Anything in orbiter response that would indicate other than tiles?

Dittmore: Well within the ability of the FCS to respond, but "out of family" - we've never seen it before. Not tremendously unusual by itself.

CBS: Possibliity LG door coming off or ET door opening?

Dittmore: loss of a single tile would not result in a loss of vehicle. [Dodged question - don't want to speculate]

All wiring of failed sensors goes through wheel well area.

76 posted on 02/02/2003 2:34:29 PM PST by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: steveo
I can't watch it but some guy talking was a weeny it sure sounds like sheeeesh R U a rocket scientist?
77 posted on 02/02/2003 2:34:29 PM PST by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday! (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Rafterman1
left wing/fuselage bond-line temperature (where the wing joins the fuselage?)

Top of the wing, where it joins the fuselage.

Wheel wells are on the underside of the wing.

Trim adjustments refer to autopilot keeping the craft at the design attitude during re-entry. Trim adjustments indicate more drag on left side (more heat on left side also indicates more drag on left side).

I like that facts are being presented -- wish there were more of them.

78 posted on 02/02/2003 2:34:30 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Budge
Lose of one tile on the wheel well will not cause a problem.....but if several were lost in a grouping when hit by the installion.....
79 posted on 02/02/2003 2:34:38 PM PST by Dog ( STS 107......They have slipped the surly bonds of earth..........to touch the face of God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Budge
Don't they dog those doors down before flight? I do wonder because it keeps leading back to the wheel well.
80 posted on 02/02/2003 2:34:42 PM PST by Braak (Democrats...always on the wrong side of history...since 1945.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 581-585 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson