Skip to comments.
NASA Press Conference LIVE THREAD
Fox, CNN, networks, NASA TV
| February 2, 2003
| NASA
Posted on 02/02/2003 2:00:17 PM PST by snopercod
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380, 381-400, 401-420 ... 581-585 next last
To: snopercod
Where did you work for NASA? I spent my career...Hq, JSC, MSFC, and the Cape during Apollo.
381
posted on
02/02/2003 3:50:26 PM PST
by
Gracey
To: alancarp
Makes sense.
382
posted on
02/02/2003 3:50:49 PM PST
by
The Great Satan
(Revenge, Terror and Extortion: A Guide for the Perplexed)
To: seamole
Aw shucks...<scraping bare foot in the dirt> Thanks for that, it's appreciated more than you know.
To: PhiKapMom
He drops in every time Waco, Flight 800, or OKC are addressed. He knows less than anyone else discussing the issue in question and always takes the government's side. I've seen him pass off government reports for proof of one thing, upon closer inspection you find that the document is nothing but spin. Very bad spin. There is one instance I remember that was downright laughable, although I can't remember to specifics at the moment.
To: Karsus
Re:
Sleep? Have you not heard of JOLT COLA!
Last night I tried a 12 pack of Keystone Lite on an empty stomach and didn't even get sleepy. Went back on Dr. Pepper around 4 AM. I am getting a little giddy now, but no ZZZs in forecast.
To: alancarp
Excellent thought. If that is true, I wonder if it came from that capsule that was thought to have gone into the lake on the TX/LA border?
386
posted on
02/02/2003 3:51:28 PM PST
by
CedarDave
(We gave peace a chance, what we got was 9/11)
To: alancarp
Except that the initial reports of finding a hand and an arm yesterday morning in San Augustine, TX -- as well as later CBS reports of four confirmed findings of body parts in East Texas -- seem to have been confirmed. Doesn't sound as if they were all in one place.
To: Dog
At that altitude and speed any damaged or misoperating control surface could cause loss of control. Aerodynamics gets weird at hypersonic speeds or so this nonexpert understands.
To: snopercod
When I worked in operations there, I tried to build some support for that kind of plan, but just got blank stares...Where I learned a good part of my 'trade' they had a saying, a slogan: "DIRTFT". We called it "Dirty Feet". It stood for Do it right the first time.
Nice thought, but, sometimes you need a damn good back-up plan ...
389
posted on
02/02/2003 3:51:57 PM PST
by
_Jim
To: WoofDog123
" These guys were on their own in space. Their only option was to land. " This fact seems lost on "Send Bruce Willis and his lovable misfits up to save them" crowd. Nonetheless, it is still an indisputable fact.
390
posted on
02/02/2003 3:52:20 PM PST
by
Republic of Texas
(Sarcasm detectors on sale now in the lobby)
To: Gracey
I was an Orbiter Test Conductor [OTC] at the cape. Before that, the lead instrumentation engineer for Atlantis.
Now I'm just unemployed...
To: Budge
"Why not the other way around? Refraction."
Makes sense. Like the difference between trying to identify the sillhouette of a far aloft airplane from 10 feet under water, versus trying to identify from far aloft an airplane that rests under 10 feet of water.
To: The Great Satan
Bingo. Best explanation of the day. Good job.
To: _Jim
...sometimes you need a damn good back-up planA thought that seems to have been lost with these guys.
To: Mo1
I'm not sure how that would work. The NASA guy who wrote the article says the tiles are very fragile. But if there was a problem, it probably could not of been fixed once they reached orbit. But if, as the Columbia re-entered, and IF the tiles started to peel, it MIGHT have shown up like they are saying the sensors went off. Not all at one time.
395
posted on
02/02/2003 3:53:50 PM PST
by
Jael
To: Beelzebubba
Like the difference between trying to identify the sillhouette of a far aloft airplane from 10 feet under water, versus trying to identify from far aloft an airplane that rests under 10 feet of water. Exactly.
396
posted on
02/02/2003 3:54:49 PM PST
by
Budge
(God Bless FReepers!)
To: Gracey
I thought Ron did a good job of putting some of the telemetry issues in laymen's terms.
If some of the extra data turns out to be valid that could shed further light on the order of sensor failure and may give further info on how the orbitor broke up.
397
posted on
02/02/2003 3:55:00 PM PST
by
fooman
To: HairOfTheDog
I think they just got used to the foam blowing off, it happened time and time again.
I know they are experts, that's why I quoted the guy responsible for inspecting the Columbia. :-)
398
posted on
02/02/2003 3:55:08 PM PST
by
Jael
To: sonofatpatcher2
ROFL!
399
posted on
02/02/2003 3:55:09 PM PST
by
snopercod
(too much blood in my alcohol system...)
To: Jael
Just out of curiosity, how do they know the tiles couldn't have been fixed in orbit. Have they ever run any experiments while they've been up there to find out?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380, 381-400, 401-420 ... 581-585 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson