Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Feds obtain sealed case of Ritter's arrest
AP | 1/25/03

Posted on 01/25/2003 3:07:17 PM PST by kattracks

ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) -- Federal authorities have obtained the sealed records in the alleged Internet sex sting of former U.N. chief weapons inspector Scott Ritter to review for possible federal charges.

State Supreme Court Justice Joseph Teresi signed an order Thursday requiring police and Albany County prosecutors to provide records and any evidence to the FBI and the U.S. attorney's office.

Federal authorities filed a motion earlier in the week to obtain the records to determine whether federal laws were violated, the Daily Gazette of Schenectady and the Times Union of Albany reported in Saturday editions.

Assistant U.S. Attorney William Pericak refused to comment to the newspapers. A message to his office by The Associated Press was not immediately returned Saturday.

Ritter, 41, a critic of the Bush administration's push toward war with Iraq, acknowledged his June 2001 arrest this week in national television appearances but said he was prohibited from discussing details because the charges had been dismissed and the records sealed.

Ritter has suggested recent news reports about the arrest were an attempt to silence him. He said the publicity has forced him to cancel a recent trip to Baghdad, where he said he would have offered an alternative to military action.

Broadcast reports when he was arrested and recent newspaper reports have indicated Ritter was caught in an Internet sex sting, something he did not admit.

At the time of the arrest, NBC station WNYT-TV of Albany reported that William Scott Ritter Jr. -- Ritter's full name -- was charged with trying to lure an undercover police officer posing as a 16-year-old girl to a restaurant.

WNYT broadcast Ritter's mug shot but did not make the connection to his role as the chief U.N. weapons inspector in Iraq during most of the 1990s.

He was charged with attempted endangerment of a child, a misdemeanor that carries up to 90 days in jail, reports said. The case was adjourned in contemplation of dismissal, meaning that if he stayed out of trouble for six months, the charges would disappear and the file would be sealed.



TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 14islegaliniraq; bonerking; havingitmyway; holdthepickle; homeofthewhopper; scottritter; traitorbusted
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 401-407 next last
To: William McKinley
Did the Times report George W. Bush's DUI?

Do bears sh*t in the forest?

241 posted on 01/25/2003 7:36:47 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: eddie willers
I know...creepy, ain't it? It's like the "Parallax View".
242 posted on 01/25/2003 7:37:11 PM PST by Deb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: tetelestai; Jhoffa_; Cultural Jihad
ping.
243 posted on 01/25/2003 7:40:35 PM PST by Dec31,1999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
"The Judge that handled Ritter's case leaked the information??"

No...I mean as far as I know, no, he didn't leak it. Crier's repeating things that were flying around on the DU around the middle of last week. A thread that Pitt...or somebody claiming to be him, was on, BTW.

244 posted on 01/25/2003 7:40:43 PM PST by cake_crumb (Typos are my frends. They follow me wherever I go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb
Are the Crummys relatives of yours, cake_crumb? ;)
245 posted on 01/25/2003 7:42:20 PM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb
Or maybe Ritter bought him off. If he's a Republican, I hope not...but if he did, he deserves what he gets too.

Absolutely.

But I hope to heck he didn't. Just imagine which character in this saga would get the blaring headlines. (Hint: not the payoff paying perv Ritter)

246 posted on 01/25/2003 7:43:07 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
Ive seen crummy puns but that takes the cake
247 posted on 01/25/2003 7:44:50 PM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
Try the New York Post. It's decidedly different from the New York PC Slimes. :)_
248 posted on 01/25/2003 7:45:52 PM PST by Dec31,1999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: woofie
Oooh. But that was only two-thirds of a pun: P.U.
249 posted on 01/25/2003 7:46:28 PM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
What bothers me about what Crier said and Ritter's claim that it was a VRWC is that NOBODY forced Scott Ritter to log on to the chat room, NOBODY forced Scott Ritter to arrange a meeting with a girl he knew was a minor, NOBODY forced Scott Ritter to drive to the Burger King.

What's lost here is that Scott Ritter is a demented child predator. It's so typical of the left to ignore the real problem and try to paint themselves as some kind of victims because their dirty laundry gets aired. IMHO Crier is completely incompetent. To ignore the fact that Scott Ritter took it upon himself to use his keyboard and his Internet connection to lure a child into meeting him with the expectations of a sexual encounter is irresponsible and reprehensible. There is no limit on how low the leftist media will go in order to protect the rapist, pedophiles, and sexual predators that make up their ideology. These people are lacking a soul PERIOD

250 posted on 01/25/2003 7:48:49 PM PST by MJY1288 ("This looks like a rerun of a bad movie and I'm not interested in watching it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: tubebender
I can't remember whether I heard it on Rush Limbaugh or the local Albany radio station, where a father called in and said he was really angry that local families weren't warned that a pedophile was living in their area. This father of a daughter was livid, as well he should be. I agree with this father - Ritter is one bad dude.
251 posted on 01/25/2003 7:49:06 PM PST by maxwellp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: woofie; Cultural Jihad; cake_crumb
No, we're talking about Pretty Crummie, not cake, nor crumbs! : )
252 posted on 01/25/2003 7:51:55 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: DAnconia55
I'd read this thread, but I'm sure the posts by 'conservatives' calling for federal prosecution (merely for partisan reasons) - of a local/state crime will sicken me.

253 posted on 01/25/2003 7:52:36 PM PST by DAnconia55 (Let's practice seperation of religion from heads. Muslims, specifically....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: maxwellp
It was on Rush.
254 posted on 01/25/2003 7:54:00 PM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
The Dems never met a criminal that they didn't like, or couldn't defend, as long as such spewed their party propaganda.
255 posted on 01/25/2003 7:54:42 PM PST by Dec31,1999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
"Oh, I bet they knew about this before it broke national news...."

Before it broke in the national news? DEFINITELY.

256 posted on 01/25/2003 7:54:46 PM PST by cake_crumb (Typos are my frends. They follow me wherever I go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: woofie; Cultural Jihad; cake_crumb
Ive seen crummy puns but that takes the cake

A slice of irony if I ever heard one.

257 posted on 01/25/2003 7:55:26 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
One hopes (Geez).
258 posted on 01/25/2003 7:56:32 PM PST by Deb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: Dec31,1999
Exactly. They apparently will turn a blind eye to rape so long as the rapist is pro-abortion.
259 posted on 01/25/2003 7:57:42 PM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: DAnconia55
There is nothing amiss with reviewing the records to see if any Federal statutes were violated. That's their job, after all. Corruption in the local prosecutor's office could constitute such an occasion for scrutiny.
260 posted on 01/25/2003 8:02:02 PM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 401-407 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson