Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MJY1288
The Dems never met a criminal that they didn't like, or couldn't defend, as long as such spewed their party propaganda.
255 posted on 01/25/2003 7:54:42 PM PST by Dec31,1999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies ]


To: Dec31,1999
Exactly. They apparently will turn a blind eye to rape so long as the rapist is pro-abortion.
259 posted on 01/25/2003 7:57:42 PM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies ]

To: Dec31,1999
The only reason why the leftist media is defending Scott Ritter is because he is against President Bush. You can best believe if he was repeating his sworn testimony in 1998 that Saddam had WMD's and needed to be stopped as a matter of National Security, we would be seing Scott ritter be portrayed as the "Face of Conservatives" and comparing him to Bob Packwood.

I'm glad the FEDS have decided to look into this, Not because I think Ritter should be prosecuted by the FEDS, But why did the case get sealed and who ordered it. There is more to this story and I can't help but think the DNC is involved. Ritter was compromised somewhere and sometime and I believe either Hillary, Bill or that smarmy Terry McAuliffe has something very big on him

263 posted on 01/25/2003 8:03:48 PM PST by MJY1288 ("This looks like a rerun of a bad movie and I'm not interested in watching it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson