[MJY1288]

The only reason why the leftist media is defending Scott Ritter is because he is against President Bush. You can best believe if he was repeating his sworn testimony in 1998 that Saddam had WMD's and needed to be stopped as a matter of National Security, we would be seing Scott ritter be portrayed as the "Face of Conservatives" and comparing him to Bob Packwood.

I'm glad the FEDS have decided to look into this, Not because I think Ritter should be prosecuted by the FEDS, But why did the case get sealed and who ordered it. There is more to this story and I can't help but think the DNC is involved. Ritter was compromised somewhere and sometime and I believe either Hillary, Bill or that smarmy Terry McAuliffe has something very big on him

[Dec31,1999]

The story got sealed because our defenders, i.e. firemen, policemen, etc, get "points" when arrested, at least in NY.

[NetValue]

"There is more to this story and I can't help but think the DNC is involved. Ritter was compromised somewhere and sometime and I believe either Hillary, Bill or that smarmy Terry McAuliffe has something very big on him"

Ritter will get scrutiny to see whether he was being blackmailed while in Iraq. If he was, he will be scrutinized to see if he was a witting inspector who allowed certain Iraqi weapons to be covertly developed (as in, did he turn a blind eye to what was going on, or worse, participate). Only the people in the dark reaches of counter-intel know whether there is reason to suspect Ritter worked for Iraq, so this is pure speculation to advise you what to be watching for in news developments. He is probably innocent of the dark scenario above - but the CI people have to look at him in a new light now, one that could explain just why he flipped so deeply and quickly to become pro-Iraq.