Skip to comments.
Feds obtain sealed case of Ritter's arrest
AP
| 1/25/03
Posted on 01/25/2003 3:07:17 PM PST by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240, 241-260, 261-280 ... 401-407 next last
To: William McKinley
Did the Times report George W. Bush's DUI? Do bears sh*t in the forest?
To: eddie willers
I know...creepy, ain't it? It's like the "Parallax View".
242
posted on
01/25/2003 7:37:11 PM PST
by
Deb
To: tetelestai; Jhoffa_; Cultural Jihad
ping.
To: Mo1
"The Judge that handled Ritter's case leaked the information??"No...I mean as far as I know, no, he didn't leak it. Crier's repeating things that were flying around on the DU around the middle of last week. A thread that Pitt...or somebody claiming to be him, was on, BTW.
244
posted on
01/25/2003 7:40:43 PM PST
by
cake_crumb
(Typos are my frends. They follow me wherever I go.)
To: cake_crumb
Are the Crummys relatives of yours, cake_crumb? ;)
To: cake_crumb
Or maybe Ritter bought him off. If he's a Republican, I hope not...but if he did, he deserves what he gets too.Absolutely.
But I hope to heck he didn't. Just imagine which character in this saga would get the blaring headlines. (Hint: not the payoff paying perv Ritter)
To: Cultural Jihad
Ive seen crummy puns but that takes the cake
247
posted on
01/25/2003 7:44:50 PM PST
by
woofie
To: OldFriend
Try the
New York Post. It's decidedly different from the New York PC Slimes. :)_
To: woofie
Oooh. But that was only two-thirds of a pun: P.U.
To: Howlin
What bothers me about what Crier said and Ritter's claim that it was a VRWC is that NOBODY forced Scott Ritter to log on to the chat room, NOBODY forced Scott Ritter to arrange a meeting with a girl he knew was a minor, NOBODY forced Scott Ritter to drive to the Burger King.
What's lost here is that Scott Ritter is a demented child predator. It's so typical of the left to ignore the real problem and try to paint themselves as some kind of victims because their dirty laundry gets aired. IMHO Crier is completely incompetent. To ignore the fact that Scott Ritter took it upon himself to use his keyboard and his Internet connection to lure a child into meeting him with the expectations of a sexual encounter is irresponsible and reprehensible. There is no limit on how low the leftist media will go in order to protect the rapist, pedophiles, and sexual predators that make up their ideology. These people are lacking a soul PERIOD
250
posted on
01/25/2003 7:48:49 PM PST
by
MJY1288
("This looks like a rerun of a bad movie and I'm not interested in watching it.")
To: tubebender
I can't remember whether I heard it on Rush Limbaugh or the local Albany radio station, where a father called in and said he was really angry that local families weren't warned that a pedophile was living in their area. This father of a daughter was livid, as well he should be. I agree with this father - Ritter is one bad dude.
To: woofie; Cultural Jihad; cake_crumb
No, we're talking about Pretty Crummie, not cake, nor crumbs! : )
To: DAnconia55
I'd read this thread, but I'm sure the posts by 'conservatives' calling for federal prosecution (merely for partisan reasons) - of a local/state crime will sicken me.
253
posted on
01/25/2003 7:52:36 PM PST
by
DAnconia55
(Let's practice seperation of religion from heads. Muslims, specifically....)
To: maxwellp
It was on Rush.
To: MJY1288
The Dems never met a criminal that they didn't like, or couldn't defend, as long as such spewed their party propaganda.
To: nicmarlo
"Oh, I bet they knew about this before it broke national news...."Before it broke in the national news? DEFINITELY.
256
posted on
01/25/2003 7:54:46 PM PST
by
cake_crumb
(Typos are my frends. They follow me wherever I go.)
To: woofie; Cultural Jihad; cake_crumb
Ive seen crummy puns but that takes the cake A slice of irony if I ever heard one.
To: aristeides
One hopes (Geez).
258
posted on
01/25/2003 7:56:32 PM PST
by
Deb
To: Dec31,1999
Exactly. They apparently will turn a blind eye to rape so long as the rapist is pro-abortion.
To: DAnconia55
There is nothing amiss with reviewing the records to see if any Federal statutes were violated. That's their job, after all. Corruption in the local prosecutor's office could constitute such an occasion for scrutiny.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240, 241-260, 261-280 ... 401-407 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson