Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE CASE OF THE MISSING ELEPHANT
SITCHIN ^ | 2000 FR Post 1-20-03 | ZECHARIA SITCHIN

Posted on 01/22/2003 4:27:32 PM PST by vannrox

THE CASE OF THE MISSING ELEPHANT



The ruins and remains of Mexico's pre-Columbian civilizations enchant, intrigue, fascinate and puzzle. Of them the oldest and earliest, that of people referred-to as Olmecs, is the most enigmatic -- for they challenge present-day scholars to explain how had people from Africa come and settled and thrived in this part of the New World, thousands of years before Columbus.

The Discovery

We know how they looked because they left behind countless sculptures, marvelously carved in stone, depicting them; some, in fact, are stone portraits of Olmec leaders; colossal in size, they immortalize in stone what, to many, has been an unpleasant enigma.

The first colossal stone head was discovered in the Mexican state of Veracruz back in 1869. Its discoverer reported it in the Bulletin of the Mexican Geographical and Statistical Society as "a magnificent sculpture that most amazingly represents an Ethiopian." The report included a drawing clearly showing the stone head's Negroid features; and that doomed the discovery to oblivion...

The Re-Discovery

It was not until 1925 that the existence of the Olmecs was reaffirmed when an archaeological team from Tulane University found another such gigantic stone head in the adjoining Mexican state of Tabasco; it measured about eight feet in height and weighed some twenty four tons.

In time, many more such colossal sculptures have been found; they depict distinctly different individuals wearing helmets; they also clearly depict, in each case, a person with African features -- black Africans.



As archaeological discovery followed archaeological discovery, it became evident that in a vast central area of Mexico stretching from the Gulf coast to the Pacific coast, these "Olmecs" built major urban centers, engaged in mining, were the first in Mesoamerica to have a calendar and hieroglyphic writing, and established what is by now recognized as Mesoamerica's Mother Civilization.

The Unpleasant Problem



The problem that this posed was twofold: Not only the issue of Negroid Africans somehow crossing the Atlantic Ocean and settling in the New World before others; but also the incredible antiquity of such arrival. This problem was dealt with by first suggesting that the Olmecs appeared after more famed peoples such as the Mayas; then by grudgingly acknowledging earlier dates B.C. --250 B.C., then 500 B.C., then 1250 B.C., then even 1500 B.C.



Faced with such evidence, the solution was to deny that these were Africans ... Even now a noted scholar, writing in the official catalogue of the Museum of Anthropology of Jalapa, states in regard to the individuals depicted in the sculptures: "in spite of the general similarity of features -- flat noses with flaring nostrils and thickened lips (leading some to falsely claim an African origin for the Olmec)," etc.

So: "To falsely claim an African origin for the Olmecs"!

And this brings me to the Case of the Missing Elephant.

An Elephant Among the Wheels



Jalapa, a gem of a town, is about two hours' drive from Veracruz (where the Spanish Conquistador Hernan Cortes landed in 1519). Its museum is undoubtedly second only to the famed one in Mexico City; but unlike Mexico City's which displays artifacts from all over the country, the Jalapa one exhibits only locally discovered artifacts -- predominantly Olmec ones.

Dramatically and effectively displayed in an innovative setting, the Museum boasts several colossal stone heads as well as other stone sculptures. It also displays smaller objects found at Olmec sites; among them, in special display showcases, are what are considered to be Olmec "toys." They include animals mounted on wheels -- a visual and evidentiary negation of the common claim that the people of Mesoamerica (and America in general) were unfamiliar with the wheel.

And included in the same display case were elephants -- "toys" made of clay.

Gone - Where and Why?

I, and some of my fans who accompanied me, saw them on previous visits to the Museum.

BUT when I (and again some of my fans with me) was there recently -- in December 1999 -- the elephants were nowhere in sight!

I could find no one in authority to obtain an explanation from. But that the elephants were once there was a fact indeed, here is a photograph of one, shot on a previous visit:



Now, here is the significance of this small artifact: There are no, and never have been, elephants in the Americas. There are and have been elephants in Africa. And a depiction of an elephant could have been made only by someone who has seen an elephant, i.e. someone who has been to Africa!

At this and other museums later visited in December 1999, guards have asserted that objects that I wished to point out and that were written up in my book The Lost Realms but somehow vanished, were loaned for an overseas exhibit.

Perhaps. But that such a hard-to-explain depiction of an elephant would be selected to highlight Mexico's ancient heritage, is either unlikely or highly significant.

I suppose one will have to revisit Jalapa and find out whether the little elephant is back among the "toys."

ZECHARIA SITCHIN



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: conventional; elephant; history; mexico; past; puzzle; toy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: vannrox
Yeah, I was hung over too that day I hung out at the museum in Jalapa. I saw a ton of pink elephants.
21 posted on 01/22/2003 8:53:08 PM PST by Porterville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Xalapa
22 posted on 01/22/2003 8:53:23 PM PST by Porterville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
Since you posted it and I was not familiar with the "mud dobber" dating claim, I DID dig for your claimed carbon dating (or any dating at all) of the Ica Stones and found diddly squat from anybody except those "believers" quoting each other. Not ONE scholarly or scientific paper reporting such dating was returned on several searches, including websites that are convinced the stones are genuine.

You made the assertion that these artifacts were ancient and had been scientifically dated by dating an attached "mud-dobber" nest. Now you assert it is "Material imbedded in the carving fissures..." that is the source of the dating. Carbon dating has come a long way in the past 40 years or so, but it still requires more material than could be obtained from the fissures in a scratch in a stone. In addition, I could find NO citations or links to such test.

I assert that they are forgeries. My assertion is backed up by the forgers admitting their forgery, explaining their method AND DEMONSTRATING it to order. The ORIGINAL SOURCE of the very first stone sold to Dr. Javier Cabrera (the "finder") admitted he made it. When the forgers were asked why they forged the stones they said it was easier than farming.

The dating of the French and Basque cave drawings is irrelevant.

The images on the Ica Stones are not "carved" they are scratched, removing the "aged" surface glaze. Then the stones were placed in a chicken yard to be artificially "aged" by "expert" chickens pooping on them.

MHGinTN, I am interested in Cryptoarchaeology and find the arguments that the Olmecs had at least contact with some negroid persons to be compelling, but serious consideration of such claims is DAMAGED by the inclusion of such easily refuted frauds as the Ica Stones. The Olmec controversy is seriously researched by qualified scientists and you can find scholars on both sides as well as peer reviewed articles examining the disputed information. With the Ica Stones, you find, on the stone's are authentic side, gullibility, unscientific claims, spurious reports of non-existant carbon dating, and outlandish theories to explain the anachronistic images... on the other we find the evidence the stones are frauds and all serious scholars and scientists dismiss them as such.
23 posted on 01/22/2003 9:38:44 PM PST by Swordmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
I misled you, Sorry. The mud dauber and cave story relates to the cave paintings in Southern France. The notion of an ancient insect artifact proving the age of the paintings I was trying to relate to the way it is claimed the initial stones were dated ... detritus or coloring imbedded in the crevices that could be dated.

Well, I'm not a serious scholar in the field of your expertise, so I will accept your debunking of these stones and go on. But, darn it, you've shot to heck a fun myth!

24 posted on 01/22/2003 10:03:16 PM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
No Problem, MGHinTN. You and I have had some fun on other threads... and there is still more fun to be had on others with cryptoarchaeological finds that are not such blatent frauds.
25 posted on 01/22/2003 10:21:40 PM PST by Swordmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Calvin Locke
There were still mastodons running around North America 10,000 years ago.
26 posted on 01/23/2003 2:03:28 PM PST by JackelopeBreeder ("Push to test." <click> "Release to detonate." Uhh, can I see that manual again?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson