Skip to comments.
'Oldest star chart' found
BBC NEWS ^
| Tuesday, 21 January, 2003, 10:50 GMT
| By Dr David Whitehouse
Posted on 01/21/2003 3:26:34 PM PST by vannrox
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Very Interesting.
1
posted on
01/21/2003 3:26:34 PM PST
by
vannrox
To: All
Donating to the FreeRepublic will keep the bright beacon of Freedom shining so that our Troops and the world will know we stand with them.
|
|
Please join us.
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
2
posted on
01/21/2003 3:28:38 PM PST
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: vannrox
That's not a star chart.
That's the first Sylvester Stallone movie and those are arrow notches on the back.
3
posted on
01/21/2003 3:29:18 PM PST
by
DannyTN
To: vannrox
I'm unconvinced.
Any representation of the constellation would have some indication of the three stars of the belt, plus the sword.
These publicity-hounds are forgetting that just because we think of it as a hunter, doesn't mean that other cultures would. Moreover, many stars move noticeably over tens of thousands of years (I'm unsure about Orion, but I recall that the Big Dipper looked quite different a couple tens of thousands of years ago.)
To: Beelzebubba
Wow, & I thought I was old!
5
posted on
01/21/2003 3:45:12 PM PST
by
norraad
To: vannrox
Bump
6
posted on
01/21/2003 3:46:16 PM PST
by
Fiddlstix
(Tag Line Service Center: FREE Tag Line with Every Monthly Donation to FR. Get Yours. Inquire Within)
To: vannrox
Between his legs hangs what could be a swordHmm, now what else could possibly be hanging between his legs?
Sounds like ancient man sure had a lot of useless time on his hands. And why does every artifact from olden days always have to be interpreted as involving religious rites? Maybe in 32,000 years scientists will interpret Britney Spears Pepsi ads as being demented rituals to the moon goddess. Or wait, are they?
To: KellyAdmirer
demented rituals to the moon goddess. Or wait, are they?Ya got the demented part right, at least
8
posted on
01/21/2003 5:09:14 PM PST
by
Ace's Dad
To: KellyAdmirer
On one side of the tablet is the man-like being with his legs apart and arms raised. Between his legs hangs what could be a sword and his waist is narrow. His left leg is shorter than his right one. Ah..right. Yes, that's a sword, or are you happy to see me?
9
posted on
01/21/2003 5:16:41 PM PST
by
WL-law
To: KellyAdmirer
On one side of the tablet is the man-like being with his legs apart and arms raised. Between his legs hangs what could be a sword and his waist is narrow. His left leg is shorter than his right one. Ah..right. Yes, that's a sword, or are you happy to see me?
10
posted on
01/21/2003 5:17:20 PM PST
by
WL-law
To: blam
Ping
11
posted on
01/21/2003 5:23:14 PM PST
by
Bohemund
To: Bohemund
Thanks for the Ping. Already posted
here
12
posted on
01/21/2003 5:27:01 PM PST
by
blam
To: Beelzebubba
I couldn't find any movies of the proper motion of stars in Orion, but here's a page which shows the stars in the Big Dipper moving.
link
13
posted on
01/21/2003 5:29:16 PM PST
by
KarlInOhio
(Tagline.txt not found. Abort, Retry, Fail?)
To: blam
"Oldest Star Chart"
Hell, that ain't Orion. That is a carving of Mick Jaeger, the oldest star on the charts!
To: KellyAdmirer
in 32,000 years scientists will interpret Britney Spears Pepsi ads as being demented rituals to the moon goddessIn 32,000 years the religion of the "moon goddess" may be the only thing left.
To: Beelzebubba
These publicity-hounds are forgetting that just because we think of it as a hunter, doesn't mean that other cultures would. Moreover, many stars move noticeably over tens of thousands of years Mammoth tusks grow on mammoths, and mammoths don't exactly grow on a farm. He did take proper motion into consideration.
16
posted on
01/21/2003 5:37:57 PM PST
by
AndrewC
To: vannrox; Beelzebubba; KellyAdmirer; blam; AndrewC; happygrl; pabianice; aristeides; ...
When all you have is a hammer, everything begins to look like a nail. When all you have are star charts, everything begins to look like stars. This "scientist's" theory has more holes in it than an Iraqi Republican Guard tank.
Dr Rappenglueck says: "[86] is the number of days that must be subtracted from a year to equal the average number of days of a human gestation."
Baloney. Normal human gestation is 263-266 days, meaning that the number of notches should have been 99-102 not 86 if the good doctors interpretation were correct.
Dr Rappenglueck says: "[86] is also the number of days that one of Orion's two prominent stars, Betelguese, is visible."
Baloney. If we neglect twilight, Betelguese would be visible for about 180 days per year. When considering the effect of twilight, there are three standards that could be used: Civil, Nautical and Astronomical twilight. Astronomical is the most rigorous of these and is defined as where the sun is 18º below the horizon. Subtracting 18º from both horizons means that Betelguese is visible for 146 days per year, not the 86 days that the doctor claims.
Dr Rappenglueck says: "The 'sword' on the ivory tablet also corresponds to a famous and well-know feature that can be seen in Orion."
Baloney. No metal working = no swords and the Bronze Age was still 30,000 years in the future. Moreover, the concept that the stars in question in Orion might represent a sword is entirely a cultural presumption and it begs credibility to presume that two independent cultures would interpret the various star patterns the same way (especially when they didn't have swords).
Dr Rappenglueck says: "Dr Rappenglueck allowed for this effect by using a computer program to wind back the sky."
Baloney. If the Orion constellation had matched an overlay of the figure on the ivory carving, you can bet your bottom dollar that would be photo number one in this article. Or at the very least, the good doctor would have claimed that it had matched up. 32,000 years equals a hell of a lot of proper motion and the shape of the Orion constellation would more likely correspond to road kill than a standing man with a "sword".
Typical BBC crap.
Regards,
--Boot Hill
17
posted on
01/21/2003 8:16:36 PM PST
by
Boot Hill
(Ctrl) (Alt) (del)
To: vannrox
'Oldest star chart' found...it wasn't under Hillarys' coat was it ?????????
18
posted on
01/21/2003 8:58:42 PM PST
by
exmoor
To: norraad
ROFL!
(I should have said that I recall READING that the stars looked different eons ago.)
To: KarlInOhio
Orion? You mean this guy?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson