Skip to comments.
UN Inspectors Find 12 Empty Chemical Warheads -- Fox News Alert
FOX News
Posted on 01/16/2003 9:57:01 AM PST by nwctwx
Breaking on FOX News, more Information soon...
TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: chemicalweapons; iraq; un; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480, 481-500, 501-520 ... 621-626 next last
To: All
cavuto says snot ritter will be on his upcoming show.
dep
481
posted on
01/16/2003 1:00:01 PM PST
by
dep
To: Kilborn
"Not this Dem...
"I can see some pilot saying, Saddam, say hello to my little friends!" LOL! I sit corrected. Please allow me to rephrase: "Left wingnuts will say the gun is not 'smoking'...."
Wait...they ARE saying that now. OK: "The left wingnuts ARE saying the gun is not 'smoking'..."
482
posted on
01/16/2003 1:00:02 PM PST
by
cake_crumb
(What would we do without FR? Don't wait to find out. Become a monthly donor.)
To: finnman69
Yeah, we snuck a case full of 122mm chemical warhead tipped rockets using the M-1000 Stealth Forklift and snuck it in to an Iraqi Military depot and deposited it in a bunker.Good job! Your answer was better than mine!
483
posted on
01/16/2003 1:00:23 PM PST
by
PhiKapMom
(Bush/Cheney 2004)
To: Kilborn
You don't disclose the sources because they are IN Iraq, and disclosure would probably result in their deaths, which is NOT a good way to treat someone who is trying to help us!
I think it makes sense that one would not blab everything known on TV...especially with the media actively working at cross purposes to the US government. There are a lot of lives at stake here, including your own. Jumping the gun, blabbing information, or betraying sources of information could not only result in a lot of military deaths, but could provoke an early terrorist attack here at home.
I have believed that we held off from going into Iraq, although we have had proof from the beginning, because we needed to get forces in place, we needed to replace munitions spent during the Afghan campaign, and we needed to find as many potential terrorists as we could here in the US.
484
posted on
01/16/2003 1:00:36 PM PST
by
Miss Marple
(Why ARE you here, anyway?)
To: Kilborn
His argument for security reasons is null because if he shows the source of the information after the bombs in Iraq, enemies like Iran, Usama, North Korea and others will learn these secrets.Huh? If we've got people on the ground engaged in an active mission in Iraq, then the administration's got logical reason to dummy up about anything that could compromise that mission or get people killed.
It's obviously a matter of a "need to know" basis, and you, my friend, do not "need to know."
485
posted on
01/16/2003 1:02:33 PM PST
by
mhking
To: Quilla
you can bet he checked and double-checked the ramifications. He doesn't seem to me to be the type of man who would enter [our servicemen] into war without following the same process Have you read Bill Sammon's book, Fighting Back? During 9/11, that's exactly what Bush was doing....while he sat there, in front of children, in a school; he said he was concerned about reacting in a way that would cause the children alarm, of upsetting the teacher, of creating a spectacle for the reporters to witness/report while they stood in the back of the classroom.....all the while, the reporters' beepers were going crazy...and Bush well knew why.....he's a good man, who does nothing but think of others and what's best for our country. I'm so very proud to call him President.
486
posted on
01/16/2003 1:03:26 PM PST
by
nicmarlo
(I am NOT in denial; I am NOT an FR addict; I am NOT in denial; I am NOT an FR addict :)
To: Kilborn
Sharing this mother lode of information with leadership or the general public would be in the best interest for all, including BushNot only does Bush generally not do things off the cuff (as was said earlier), neither does he do things quickly (or in other words: prematurely).
Releasing all of the information that is known before he is at that absolute point of jump-off would have two effects that upset his planning process: 1. The resulting uproar from this information, which might even include the anthrax business, might be enough to force him to act before what he considers to be the proper time; 2. Early release of the information will also allow the opposition (of which there is plenty, even here in the U.S.) to construct an explanation, a justification, that would have a diplomatic impact on the ability to get support for the war internationally.
Bush wants full international backing, that much is clear.
To: pepsionice
Course, I don't want suggest something stupid...Then don't.
488
posted on
01/16/2003 1:03:33 PM PST
by
mhking
To: finnman69
Ritter to answer for himself on FNC's Neil Cavuto in just a few minutes. Cavuto is no push-over! He'll put Ritter's feet to the fire.
Can't wait!
489
posted on
01/16/2003 1:03:40 PM PST
by
MarketR
To: finnman69
Yeah, we snuck a case full of 122mm chemical warhead tipped rockets using the M-1000 Stealth Forklift and snuck it in to an Iraqi Military depot and deposited it in a bunker.Like I posted earlier, I can just see it now: "Hey, mister, is that a chemical warhead in your pocket, or are you just glad to be here?"
To: Dog
Doing fine Jim. Hey when I go to CPAC, you want some goodies?????
491
posted on
01/16/2003 1:04:05 PM PST
by
mware
To: finnman69
Just empty rockets which are expired and imported in 1988," Amin saidin that they're "expired and unusable," he would then have no objection to having one strapped to his butt and touched off?
dep
492
posted on
01/16/2003 1:04:57 PM PST
by
dep
To: finnman69
That is a funny picture. These UNSCOM guys might as well not be wearing masks at all. Their rolled up sleeves and other exposed skin would let the chemicals right in their bodies if the warheads were leaking. For a lot of chemical weapons, wearing a mask but not a chemical suit would be no help at all. These guys might as well be wearing shorts, T-shirts, and flip-flops.
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Ritter is a moron! CIA gave the inspectors the information that led them to the find.
494
posted on
01/16/2003 1:07:08 PM PST
by
PhiKapMom
(Bush/Cheney 2004)
To: PhiKapMom
They also have a scientist that took a boxload of papers with him after the inspectors showed up at his house. He led inspectors to a mound of dirt in the desert and he is now being interviewed in a local hotel. This guy's going to need a new zip code.
To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
dolphin pools in all 72 palaces? That ought to be enough of a reason to go to war for any good liberal, at least they can be for freeing the dolphins.
72 palaces? Isn't that the number of virgins expected, by someone who yells "Allah Ackbar" and goes boom?
496
posted on
01/16/2003 1:08:37 PM PST
by
CJ Wolf
(;-)
To: MarketR
Scott - not a breach. It's an accounting problem. Why does Fox keep having him on; he's a nut job.
497
posted on
01/16/2003 1:08:37 PM PST
by
Peach
To: PhiKapMom
On the other hand, it looks like (and I love my president, don't get me wrong) this might have been leaked info in order to deflect the Michigan race preference story that would have dominated tonight's big 3 newscasts. We've known that these stockpiles exist. It was just a matter of timing for that knowledge to be leaked to the media. The time was right-on today. I suppose the question has to be asked (or maybe it doesn't; Mr. Bush's motives are beyond reproach in my book) was the timing designed to deflect negative karma developing from the affirmative racism of the U. of Michigan. That idea is bound to be raised by some leftie at some point tonight.
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
I think that's an old pic by the way, but CNN is spinning it as something new.
499
posted on
01/16/2003 1:08:57 PM PST
by
finnman69
(Bush Cheney 2004)
To: MarketR
the ridiot itter is now saying that this proves that inspections work. also, that no americans were killed, and that the sealed box had not been opened since it came from yugoslavia since 1988. is this a breach? "no. absolutely not. this is an accounting problem."
what a whore.
dep
500
posted on
01/16/2003 1:09:04 PM PST
by
dep
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480, 481-500, 501-520 ... 621-626 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson