Skip to comments.
EVERYONE SHOULD BE WATCHING C-SPAN2
C-SPAN2 ^
| January 14, 2003
| THE BELOVED DEB
Posted on 01/14/2003 11:55:56 AM PST by Deb
The Democrats are in the process of shutting down the Senate to stop the GOP from chairing Senate hearings.
This is going to be two years of total war. Let's see if the media notices!
TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: democratsrweenies; obstruction
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 521-526 next last
To: Deb
81
posted on
01/14/2003 12:26:59 PM PST
by
Nick Danger
(Kim Jong Il: the other dead meat)
To: Area51
Hillary does not have balls. If she did, she would have made the Senate her goal without having to be married to the president first.
To: swarthyguy
They don't have Clintoon out in front of the microphones now. We have the bullhorn.
To: flamefront
Unfortunately, the GOP isn't in the majority since it doesn't have 61 votes to end Dem filibusters. And that's going to be the requirement on every vote according to Daschle.
84
posted on
01/14/2003 12:27:35 PM PST
by
Deb
To: Enterprise
I wonder if we have reached the point where our Government can no longer function.Unfortunately, with such a 50/50 polarized mix, it will take a lot to plow through the gridlock as the Senate has ingeniously built in safeguards to allow the minority to fudge up the majority. But perhaps this condition of governmental entropy is safest after all.
85
posted on
01/14/2003 12:28:15 PM PST
by
Sender
To: marajade
Hatch has agreed to have equality in funding for Judiciary. He and Leahy decided it.
To: All
Dorgan....*It isn't fair*....BWHAAAHAHAHA!
87
posted on
01/14/2003 12:28:49 PM PST
by
mystery-ak
(Democrats...Ihr seid verfluchte hunde!)
Dorgan, what an idiot.. It;s all about fairness .. LOL
88
posted on
01/14/2003 12:29:02 PM PST
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ... Please Donate or Try Going Monthly!!! You Can Make a Difference!!!)
To: Area51
Balls are optional. Sixty-one votes are necessary.
89
posted on
01/14/2003 12:29:51 PM PST
by
Deb
To: GraniteStateConservative
Big deal... funding... What matters more are other issues like how many judges can be voted on, who gets hearings and how fast, and whether or not the ABA has to report on each judge candidate...
90
posted on
01/14/2003 12:29:54 PM PST
by
marajade
To: Deb
Unfortunately, the GOP isn't in the majority since it doesn't have 61 votes to end Dem filibusters. And that's going to be the requirement on every vote according to Daschle. It all depends on what and how you bring things to the floor.....say, like tacking organization to increased school funding.....Let the Dems filibuster that....
91
posted on
01/14/2003 12:29:56 PM PST
by
hobbes1
(Vescere bracis meis)
To: GraniteStateConservative
There's a section in the new volume of Caro's life of LBJ about what was done at the opening of the new Congress in 1957, when the liberals wanted to change the filibuster rule so that cloture became easier. If I understood Caro correctly, until the old rules -- possibly with changes -- were adopted, everything was to be decided under normal rules of parliamentary procedure, i.e., with simple majorities deciding everything, without the possiblity of a filibuster.
Anybody know anything about that?
By the way, if the RATs are able to filibuster the reorganization resolution and block Senate business, what happens until the filibuster ends? Do the committees function? Do staffs get paid? Is all business to be conducted -- in the absence of committees -- on the Senate floor?
C-SPAN Radio had a Senate Commerce Committee hearing this morning. How was it possible to hold this?
To: Deb
Should we send the democrat senators a telegram to say we're tired of them acting like toddlers and they need to get the people's business done?
93
posted on
01/14/2003 12:31:56 PM PST
by
swheats
(Jeffords' shift made the democrat majority illigitimate.)
To: marajade
Collins is not only up for a chairmanship, her committee gets oversight over homeland security.
To: GraniteStateConservative
Tell me you are joking about Hatch and Judiciary!
That is THE SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT PLUM the GOP won this past November.
Why in the name of all that is Holy would Hatch agree to this? He would simply be handing that wretch Leahy another club ($$) to beat over the heads of Bush's judiciary choices.
Is he THAT stoopid?
Damn.
To: NormsRevenge; All
All that needs be done is everytime a Dem says we want to get this done because we need to work on Social Security, Jobs , econmy , etc. A Repub needs to ask for a question and say "I agree we need to get to work will you allow the vote now?"
Do it over and over and over repeat it till the cows come home. It will get on the news that way!
96
posted on
01/14/2003 12:33:29 PM PST
by
Mad Dawgg
(I am sure Byrd has something to do with it!)
To: GraniteStateConservative
Hatch has agreed to have equality in funding for Judiciary. He and Leahy decided it.That's really disappointing, but not surprising.
To: hobbes1
I'm sure that now that everyone is clear on what's going to be the Daschle plan for obstruction, Frist will work it out.
98
posted on
01/14/2003 12:34:24 PM PST
by
Deb
To: GraniteStateConservative
Your post #86... how about a link...
99
posted on
01/14/2003 12:34:29 PM PST
by
marajade
To: borkrules
I was floored when I heard Hatch had done that. No, wait a minute. I wasn't.
Our own people are intent on NOT abiding by the rules.
Somebody should stand up and say, "The reason we agreed to it last time was because we had a WEAK SISTER as our leader then, but things have changed."
100
posted on
01/14/2003 12:34:32 PM PST
by
Howlin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 521-526 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson