Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blix Says Iraq Violated U.N. Sanctions
ABC News ^ | 1/9/03

Posted on 01/09/2003 12:04:54 PM PST by areafiftyone

U.N. weapons inspectors said Thursday they have not found any "smoking guns" but have discovered that Iraq violated U.N. sanctions by importing parts for its missile program.

Mohamed ElBaradei, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, complained that his inspectors haven't been able to conduct private interviews with Iraqi scientists who may have knowledge of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs.

"We are not able to have interviews in Iraq in private and that does not show the proactive cooperation we seek," ElBaradei said after briefing the U.N. Security Council on the progress of inspections and assessments of Iraq's 12,000-page weapons declaration.

Chief U.N. weapons inspector Hans Blix told the council that Iraq has not made a "serious effort" to respond to his request for the names of Iraqi scientists who were involved in weapons of mass destruction programs. But both men stressed that the inspections process needs more time.

"The absence of a smoking gun and the prompt access which we have had so far, and which is most welcome, is no guarantee that prohibited stocks or activities could not exist at other sites, whether above ground, underground or in mobile units," Blix told the council.

U.S. Ambassador John Negroponte called on Iraq to admit to weapons programs "it maintains, even today."

"Anything less is not cooperation and will constitute further material breach," Negroponte said, using diplomatic language that could pave the way for war.

In Baghdad, Gen. Hossam Mohammed Amin, the chief Iraqi liaison officer to the inspection teams, said that a U.N. inspector had raised the possibility without making a formal request of taking Iraqi scientists to Cyprus for questioning. He said scientists could decide for themselves whether to go but that they were expected to refuse.

Blix told reporters earlier that he hadn't heard of such a request but planned to conduct interviews in the near future. Negroponte said the United States expected inspectors to "to begin out-of-country interviews."

"The burden remains on Iraq to demonstrate compliance," Negroponte said, adding that inspectors are there to "verify Iraqi disarmament, not to serve as detectives working to overcome elaborate concealment mechanisms."

During Blix's briefing to the Security Council, he said Iraq had admitted in its weapons declaration to importing missile engines and raw material for the production of solid missile fuel. "This import has taken place in violation of the relevant resolutions regulating import and export to Iraq."

ElBaradei said inspectors were investigating what happened to 32 tons of HMX high explosive that Iraq says was turned into industrial explosive but which can also be used to detonate nuclear weapons.

The inspectors are to give a formal report on Iraq's compliance on Jan. 27. British Prime Minister Tony Blair said that date should not be seen as a deadline for conflict.

"We are in the middle of a process. The U.N. inspectors have just, at the beginning of the year, got their full complement of inspectors there," Blair told government ministers in London on Thursday, according to his spokesman.

The United States, backed by Britain, has threatened military action against Iraq if it does not comply with U.N. demands and rid itself of programs for chemical, biological and nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles. But Blix stressed that the U.N. resolution does not put a time limit on inspections.

He noted that Iraq's weapons declaration confirmed his initial impression that the dossier was incomplete. "We think that the declaration failed to answer a great many questions," he told reporters.

He said Iraq had not replied to his requests for the answers made since the declaration. "Iraq may have more to say. I hope so," he said.

In Baghdad, Amin denied inspectors had submitted any questions and said Iraq had shown that it no longer has any weapons of mass destruction.

For much of the Security Council, the issues of Iraqi cooperation with inspectors and evidence of clandestine Iraqi weapons programs are considered crucial to support for any military action.

"We have now been there for some two months and been covering the country in ever wider sweeps and we haven't found any smoking guns," Blix said.

Asked whether inspectors were getting significant intelligence from the United States, Blix said: "Well, we are getting intelligence from several sources and I will not go into the operative part of that, but it's clear that this will be helpful in the future to us."

"We have gone to, I think, about 125 sites already, and some of them were not visited before, and there will be more. And as more intelligence comes in, there will be more sites visited. I'm confident that we will get more intelligence."

Blix has said previously that his inspectors need intelligence from other nations because Iraq's weapons declaration leaves so many unanswered questions that it's impossible to verify its claim of having no weapons of mass destruction.

Secretary of State Colin Powell told The Washington Post for Thursday's editions that in the past few days, the United States has begun giving inspectors "significant intelligence" that has enabled them to become "more aggressive and to be more comprehensive in the work they're doing."

But Washington is holding back some information to see if inspectors "are able to handle it and exploit it. ... It is not a matter of opening up every door we have," Powell said.

French Foreign Minister Dominique de Villepin said his government wants the council to comply with Resolution 1441, adopted Nov. 8, which asks all countries to provide information on Iraq's "prohibited programs" and recommend sites to be visited and Iraqis to be interviewed.

The United States has promised to share information with inspectors, as long as U.S. intelligence sources aren't compromised. "We have and will continue to provide information to the inspectors," a U.S. official said Wednesday, speaking on condition of anonymity.

Britain opened a channel weeks ago to provide the inspectors with information and "they are getting all that we can usefully give," a British official said Wednesday, speaking on condition of anonymity.

French President Jacques Chirac, two days after telling his armed forces to be ready "for all eventualities," said Thursday he hoped the Iraq crisis would be resolved peacefully and reiterated that military action must be a last resort.

Chirac said the government will work alongside the United Nations to make Saddam comply with his U.N. disarmament obligations and that France would continue to push for a diplomatic solution.




TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: Man of the Right
"At this point, either Bush steps forward and plays the bad cop and mobilizes and invades or Iraq joins the nuclear club."

President Bush has been 'playing' the 'bad cop' all along...or at least the Big, Bad Cowboy...which the Amerelefties and EUrolefties seem even MORE scared of.

61 posted on 01/09/2003 3:03:43 PM PST by cake_crumb (<VBEG> Very Big Evil Grin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
Germany became a member on 1/1/03.
62 posted on 01/09/2003 3:04:28 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Yeah, whatever Hans, like it matters what you say.
63 posted on 01/09/2003 3:05:40 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"(Semper Fi .. If you wonder where the Nazis went after WW2, Just look to the UN for the answer.)"

Great tag line <G>

64 posted on 01/09/2003 3:08:46 PM PST by cake_crumb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
"I'm thinking if it comes out publicly that members of the Security Council were violating U.N. sanctions on selling such material to Iraq..."

We all wonder too...

65 posted on 01/09/2003 3:10:39 PM PST by cake_crumb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: justshe
Wouldn't they fall in the 'either you are with us or you are against us' category?

Seems to me as if they would. I was wondering if it might be one of the U.N.S.C. members that has been "urging caution" and basically saying that Iraq isn't a big problem.

66 posted on 01/09/2003 3:11:50 PM PST by Amelia (Who's sending missile parts to Iraq?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
It could be Chinese companies.
67 posted on 01/09/2003 3:13:46 PM PST by Amelia (Who's sending missile parts to Iraq?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
"What if it's North Korea?"

Or Russia/China/France/Germany? Probably nothing, except for some quickly negotiated and signed treaties...in exchange for a LOT of grovelling, caving in to GW's demands, and huge strides forward in the concept of "representative government"...."exclusive" trade agreements...we get back into the driver's seat of the UN...

68 posted on 01/09/2003 3:19:38 PM PST by cake_crumb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb
I can't believe not even Brit is asking the question. He does say that France & Germany have recently done about faces on their positions regarding war with Iraq. There could be a reason....
69 posted on 01/09/2003 3:28:16 PM PST by Amelia (Who's sending missile parts to Iraq?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
Security Council? As in permanent menbers with veto powers, like Russia/France/Germany? There are only five permanent members with veto powers. The other two are the US and Britain...I believe we can safely drop our two governments from the list of those who're fighting so hard to keep us out of Iraq.

The other countries take turns on the council. As the terms of lesser members end, another contry comes in to take their place, rotation-style. 'Course only UN member countries can do it.

70 posted on 01/09/2003 3:28:53 PM PST by cake_crumb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
" There could be a reason...."

Probably.

I'm getting so confused and so brain-fried by ALL the spin that's coming from one statement....that it's getting hard to think...except for one thing that's engraved in gold letters: every time this media/UN spin crap happens, it's further proof the UN does NOT want us to go to Iraq...

71 posted on 01/09/2003 3:35:02 PM PST by cake_crumb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb
"As in permanent menbers with veto powers, like Russia/France/Germany"

SHEESH...Russia/China/France...

Note to self: when you have it right the FIRST time, leve it alone

72 posted on 01/09/2003 3:41:17 PM PST by cake_crumb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb; jwalsh07
Security Council? As in permanent menbers with veto powers, like Russia/France/Germany?

The permanent members with veto powers are USA, UK, China, Russia, and France. But see jwalsh07's post #46 listing "suspect" countries: "Russia, Germany, North Korea or China."

Three of the 4 are currently on the Security Council; the other is a member of the "Axis of Evil".

73 posted on 01/09/2003 3:46:11 PM PST by Amelia (Who's sending missile parts to Iraq?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
Yep...Germany's suspected military sales to Iraq got me confused...I think I ought to relax a while and go to bed. My brain cells are ready to melt down.
74 posted on 01/09/2003 4:00:02 PM PST by cake_crumb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Dear Hans.......T-minus....10...9...8...7..6..5.......
75 posted on 01/09/2003 4:29:05 PM PST by Mat_Helm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Florida_Freeper
LOL I heard the J-Blow thing on the radio the day after that happened, it was quite funny..ROFL
76 posted on 01/09/2003 5:00:29 PM PST by Morrigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Mat_Helm
Dear Hans.......T-minus....10...9...8...7..6..5.......

Attack on Iraq Betting Pool

77 posted on 01/09/2003 5:13:43 PM PST by Momaw Nadon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb
Wasn't Germany suspected of selling arms and/or chemical or bioweapons technology to Iraq several years ago?
78 posted on 01/09/2003 5:23:31 PM PST by Amelia (Who's sending missile parts to Iraq?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: ottersnot
I recently saw a movie or show on tv where two little kids were wearing tin foil hats. I about busted a gut laughing. Wish I could remember where I saw that......

That was in SIGNS. As the scene came on the screen, I couldn't help but think of the Tinfoil Hat Brigade on FR.

79 posted on 01/09/2003 5:59:02 PM PST by JoeFromSidney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

CAN I HAVE YOUR ATTENTION

PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com


STOP BY A BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

80 posted on 01/09/2003 6:44:30 PM PST by Mo1 (Vote out the Rats!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson