Posted on 01/04/2003 6:11:29 PM PST by Mia T
But wait.
Edwards has to know Clinton's long term goal is for Hillary to be president in 2008. If Edwards is so smart, can't he figure out Clinton would want the weakest link to win the 2004 Democratic nomination? Surely, Democrat conventional wisdom has to be that who ever runs against Bush in 2004 will lose. Surely that same conventional wisdom would be that Clinton expects, unscathed by 2004 Hillary, to run in 2008.
I think of all the possible Democrat candidates, John Kerry is the only one who could lose to Bush in 2004, but remain viable for another run in 2008. If Clinton were looking out for the good of the party, he would be already be on the Kerry bandwagon.
Bill Clinton has got to fear John Kerry. Kerry's the only democrat candidate who might do well against Bush in 2004. Kerry's the only one who might keep Hillary off the ticket in 2008. I think Clinton's double-dealing with Edwards, in order to weaken Kerry. The fact that Edwards can't see this, disqualifies him to be president. Too dumb.
The feminists of the nation along with gay/lesbian activists and every hang-dog looser and whiner, they are her base. The media gives them far more ink than the quite conservative that truly loves his/her country and believes in the US Constitution. Special Interests court the Clintons because of the media they will be heard.
HRC stands for nothing American, her quest is for power and money. She will always cause polarization of the nation because of the 30% who believe Socialism is the way to go, in spite of the fact most of those pushing that failed ideology are very wealthy. They like the word worker/laborer it gives them a feeling of power. Unions are their bases also, and they rant and rave for higher and higher wages for the workers. We all work idiots! ... the unions have priced us out of most trade and manufacturing in this country with their constant demands for more money and perks, they already have, freedom, liberty and choice but politicians like Hillary, Daschle and Gephardt egg them on with old rhetoric that is really demeaning; demands that do little for the average laborer but a lot for those in charge of the unions, i.e., $$$ for themselves.
The junior senator from New York, wife of the rapist is a Socialist, not part of the Republic nor cares one whit for Americans our Constitution and the Rule of Law. She is media fodder, a truly dangerous woman but she sells papers well I am not buying any! NO TO HILLARY! Keep reminding us Mia T!
THE CLINTONS: WHAT TO DO When it comes to the clintons, we have been thinking much too defensively.It is not enough to make certain these two mutants never again hold elected office.
We must change the goal. Rather than responding to this utterly noxious couple, we must offensively attack and extirpate them, their corruption, their crimes, their ineptitude, their repugnance, their cowardice, their failures.
|
|
FREE REPUBLIC EXCLUSIVES DOCUMENT CLINTON RAPES FINGER HILLARY CLINTON AS CO-RAPIST AIDER AND ABETTOR, VICTIMIZER
otwithstanding the best efforts of hillary clinton, the Senate of the United States, Doris Kearns Goodwin and those 400 other hog-and-bow-tied-save-clinton retrograde-obsessing historiographers, and, of course, Betty Friedan, the rape of Juanita Broaddrick by bill clinton became perhaps the defining issue of his impeachment trial. The rape was quickly if quietly reduced by the House of Representatives--the only impeachment participant that history will view kindly--to the obvious. How can a rapist be a fit president? (How, indeed.) I revisit this issue in The Real Danger of a Presidential Fake: Post-9/11 Reconsideration of The Placebo President. Nine-eleven has clarified for thoughtful democrats what Juanita Broaddrick, Eileen Wellstone, Kathleen Willey, Paula Jones, Monica Lewinsky, Gennifer Flowers and clinton's "ministering to hundreds of troubled young girls"--the wife's euphemism for the ad nauseams--apparently did not: clinton putrescence was not "just about sex." Even as bill clinton, the person, quickly fades into irrelevancy, 9/11 puts the lasting danger of the clinton presidency into sharp focus; and because the clintons have made it clear that they are not yet through with the trashing of the White House and the deconstructing our democracy, 9/11 renders the clinton rapes more relevant than ever. Make no mistake. hillary clinton was never, ever some betrayed little wife. Not only was this wife aware of the sexual predation from day one, she aided and abetted the rapes and exploited the victims for decades. That is to say, to gain and maintain power, hillary clinton raped, too... The clinton rapes, real devastation taken alone, synergistically affected, and ultimately became the metaphor for the depraved clinton presidency itself. Chalk America's first rape up to ignorance. What will America's excuse be if she allows the clintons to violate her again? |
PRENUP/POST-RAPE SENATE SEAT
AMERICAN MUSEUM--ER--MUSLIM COUNCIL KNOWNOTHING VICTIM RODHAM/CLINTON REVISITED
Q ERTY2 "There isn't a shred of evidence."
HILLARY, YOU KNOW, KnowNothing Victim
W I D E B O D Y. low-center-of-gravity Dim Bulb Congenital Bottom Feeder
Hardball's Softball hillary clinton 'Interview' BUSH: "I will not wait on events, while dangers gather."
What did he know. . . and when did he know it ? rodham-clinton reality-check WRITTEN IN STONE: AN ARCHITECT DEFINES THE CLINTONS DESIGNATED DEMOCRAT ATTACK DOG
BUMP! |
Everytime Edwards sticks his head up, he blunders. He muffed his Meet The Press debut back in December, his marathon announcement appearances last week, and yesterday on ABC. At some point in time, he's got to figure out that he's not prime time material.
But wait.
Who's egging Edwards on by feeding his ego and filling his purse?
Bill Clinton and trial lawyers, who I think share one real goal,
The 2008 election of President Hillary Clinton.
You've got it YaYa, they don't want anyone "good" to run, they are backing a looser and they know it and just for the reason you stated. John Edwards has made it big on the backs of insurance companies. He is law smart, but not leadership material of any kind let alone vying for the highest office in the land, in that pew, he is just plain silly if not stupid.
If Kerry were to run, this might hurt Bills wife in the long run; John is a yes man when it comes to politics, especially Clinton politics...remember Terry Stanford?...JFK's NC yes man?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.