Posted on 01/03/2003 1:52:52 AM PST by JohnHuang2
You’re right it isn’t, but incest, bestiality and consensual pedophilia is and so is other paraphilic disorders. LIKE HOMOSEXUALITY. And of course we can always play the confession card.
Just as it would be impossible for anyone to talk you or me into lusting after a guy's hairy butt,
Oh NO! Not the hairy butt defense. Run [prison inmates] run.
I believe that it is also impossible to re-orient a gay guy to lust after T&A.
Exodus and NARTH and 10’s of thousands of ex-gays say different.
You sure seem to have a lot of funny “beliefs”; do you still believe in the tooth fairy too?
Thanks for the link, I will check it out. I understand that the gay rights agenda is filled with militants who would love nothing more than to "convert" the masses. Many of the same people want promote pedophilia. These people are less than garbage. Anybody who promotes pedophilia should be put down for good. But this gives no right to carry torches into EVERY gay persons house. I'll check out the link though, thanks.
I don't know about the "confused" part, but O'Reilly surely is "filled" with something.
|
On the Internet, there are innumerable personal ads |
Next Article: 2001 Syphilis Rates Show Increase: Does This Portend a New Wave of HIV Infections?
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released their final surveillance summary for 2001 syphilis rates in the U.S. in November of this year: Primary and secondary syphilis rates rose for the first time since 1990. Though the overall increase was slight (2.2 cases per 100,000 up from 2.1 per 100,000 in 2000), the increase occurs in the context of a very aggressive national syphilis elimination campaign launched in 1999. The national goal of syphilis elimination is to improve local capacity to respond to every syphilis case so there is no evidence of sustained transmission after an infectious case is detected (i.e., no transmission after 90 days of the report of an imported index case). This goal is numerically comparable to a reduction in the overall number of primary/secondary syphilis cases to less than 1000 by the year 2005. There were 6103 total cases of primary/secondary syphilis in 2001.
Analysis of Current Trends What Might the Current Situation Mean for HIV Transmission? What Does This Mean for HIV Treatment Providers? Summary
In 2001, rates of syphilis increased 15% among men and decreased 18% among women; the male: female ratio of syphilis cases increased 50% (from 1.4 to 2.1). Public health surveillance data do not traditionally include behavioral variables, such as same-sex contact among the men who are represented among reported syphilis cases. However, this rising M:F trend, coupled with the explosive outbreaks of syphilis among men who have sex with other men (MSM) reported in several large U.S. cities [MMWR 2001; 50:117; MMWR 2002; 51:853] indicates that the rise in U.S. syphilis rates for 2001 is due to new epidemics of syphilis among MSM.
Biologic and epidemiologic data support the concept that untreated syphilis biologically enhances HIV transmission. Data from cities reporting new epidemics of syphilis in the MSM community suggest that an increasing proportion of persons with syphilis are also HIV-infected compared to those diagnosed with syphilis in prior years. Thus, rising rates of syphilis among MSM may be a marker of changes in sexual practices among both HIV-infected and -uninfected individuals in this era of HAART and treatment optimism. This may well indicate increasing HIV transmission in many MSM communities.
The CDC surveillance summary underscores the importance of maintaining a high level of suspicion for syphilis. This remains true for all clinicians, but most importantly for clinicians who treat HIV infected patients. Clinicians should be aware that the growing connectivity of this information age allows for diverse opportunities for their patients to meet sex partners in distant cities or on distant continents: Epidemics of syphilis have been described among individuals who met in Internet-based chat rooms or through website postings, so that syphilis epidemics can be rapidly introduced tomorrow into jurisdictions reporting low syphilis morbidity today. Providers should also be aware that the clinical manifestations of syphilis may be atypical: Because oral sex is recognized to be a lower risk activity than other acts with respect to HIV transmission, clinical presentations such as oral chancres (appearing first at the site of T. pallidum inoculation) should always trigger a discussion of sexual risk behavior and serologic testing for syphilis. A request by a patient for HIV testing should prompt syphilis testing as well, and conversely, HIV testing should be recommended for any person treated for syphilis.
In past decades, rising rates of syphilis have preceded rising rates of HIV among specific populations. Though intensification of syphilis control and prevention efforts have markedly reduced syphilis rates in groups most impacted by syphilis in the past decade, these gains have been offset by rising rates among MSM. Developing effective new strategies for education, screening, and risk reduction in the MSM population will be necessary to meet syphilis elimination goals in the U.S.
You didn't feel 'sorry' for her - meaning what, you think she 'deserved' it? Well, I feel sorry for you lady....the levels of hate some of you have are endless, even going so far as trying to justify rape. And to think some of you call yourselves Christians....
For like, their behavior? Hmmm. Don't think you can even begin to defend that position Bill.
My guess is he has a homosexual priest. He basically calls any Christian who believes the entire word is a religious fanatic. He should stay away from theology because he is way off base and shows he's liberal on social issues.
Pray for W and the Troops
I think so too.
Remember when Howard Stern made those shocking comments about how the Columbine killers should have raped the school's better looking girls before killing them? When Donald Wildmon of the American Family Association condemned him for the remarks and some Stern-supporters agreed, Stern insisted that his words were taken out of context.
Wildmon struck back by posting on the AFA website an actual recording of Stern's comments, showing that he said that if he was going to kill the Columbine girls, "...I would take them out with some sex."
CBS sent Wildmon a letter threatening him and AFA with legal action, citing copyrights and what-all. Wildmon posted the letter on the site, and added an open letter to CBS in response: "So that there will be no misunderstanding, I will make my answer short. Sue."
CBS backed down.
More than anything, the Gay-stapo is afraid of the truth coming out about anything that hurts its agendas. They will do whatever it takes to stifle evidence of their true intents and motives. That's why most people who have heard of "Fistgate" have never heard the tape of it.
Not one unbiased person with an IQ over room temperature could fail to understand the significance, seriousness and imminent societal suicide built into the current "politically correct" cultural response to the issue of homosexuality.
You should send it to Fox News and to Mr. O'Reilly with a cover that says,"you will not be able to refute this so for the sake of America,deal with it,we will be looking forward to the program."
I just wonder how this critical information can get conveyed to the public to counteract the fantasies the media have concocted presenting the "gays" and their lifestyles as harmless,poignant and/or desireable. Any ideas?
As you'll notice in my original post, I said this would be the exception. If he signed, then he shouldn't whine.
I don't think I'd ever sign anything about use of my own words transferring to someone else. That seems silly.
In any case, he would be entitle to "fair use" of the segment. Coupling that with a writer's "license" to paraphrase, the could have gotten everything in without violating anything.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.