Posted on 12/26/2002 3:23:21 AM PST by Dallas
WASHINGTON - With Al Gore bowing out of the bidding for the Democratic nomination last week, Hollywood is turning its full attention to 2004 presidential hopefuls John Kerry and John Edwards -- in that order.
Even with 9/11 and the faltering economy, the stream of Dems visiting Hollywood to fund-raise for their party or themselves never really slowed. Kerry, the sophisticated U.S. senator from Massachusetts, has been spotted about the town the most, with Edwards close behind.
Just last week, Kerry met with Stanley Sheinbaum, who is something of a Democrat kingmaker in Hollywood circles, and other prominent local Dems at the Regency Club. And at a cocktail party hosted by Daphna Edwards, Kerry kicked off a 30-minute speech with the emphatic statement "I am running for president."
The decisiveness of his tone was not lost on attendees, among them real estate titan Eli Broad, Gov. Gray Davis and an array of top actors and celebs.
Neither Kerry nor Edwards has Clinton's incredible dynamism -- nor his lapses into scandal.
Kerry, 59, boasts more is the more statuesque candidate and is earning marks from liberal Dems in Hollywood for speaking out against President Bush without sounding shrill.
"Kerry is working hard, he's operational, he's focused," said former California Assembly Speaker Bob Hertzberg, who gives the Massachusetts senator the inside track. "My instinct tells me he's the one Hollywood will back."
Not everyone agrees. "I certainly wouldn't be looking to anybody who thought they were against the war and then voted for it," said actress Susan Sarandon, referring, among others, to Kerry.
"I want someone with some courage to vote for their issues," she added. "We're tired of people voting to protect their careers."
Sentiment is split as to whether the 49-year-old Edwards, with a folksy North Carolina drawl, is ready to run in '04. His advantage is that he's got a youthful persona and hasn't been on Capitol Hill that long. Ergo, he doesn't have a lot of baggage.
If there's one thing most agree on, it is that the entertainment community won't ultimately throw its collective support behind Sen. Joseph Lieberman. The reason is his continuing charge that Hollywood intentionally polluting America's children with violent, salacious images and words.
Lieberman, 61, isn't wasting any time in making showbiz a campaign issue, as he did when running as Gore's VP in the ill-fated 2000 presidential contest. Just before Christmas, Lieberman called for congressional hearings on violent vidgames.
The voting electorate always loves a dark horse, and one surprise Democratic candidate may be Col. Wesley Clarke. The former NATO supreme commander has wowed CNN audiences with his gentle and easy-to-understand analysis. He's also incredibly ambitious.
Vermont Gov. Howard Dean, a 54-year-old doctor, is the most liberal of those considering a run for the Democratic nomination. He is openly critical of Democrats who act like moderate Republicans, an argument that is likely to resonate with many Hollywood Dems. Some political mavens have called him a version of past presidential hopeful John Anderson.
No one seems jazzed about a bid by Rep. Richard Gephardt, the top U.S. House of Reps. solon who took plenty of heat after the Republican sweep in the November midterm election. There have been numerous Hollywood fund-raisers for Gephardt, whose resignation as House minority leader was a sure sign of a presidential run.
It's also remains uncertain whether outgoing Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle will make a bid for the White House.
"It's a wide-open field, but there's nobody perfect yet," said Torie Osborn, executive director of the Liberty Hill Foundation, which functions as something of a rallying point for the Dems' left wing in Los Angeles.
Myth has it that Hollywood is the country's campaign contribution capital, and that the fate of the Democratic Party rests in the hands of showbiz. In reality, there are industries that contribute far more than showbiz to campaign coffers, but political support offered up by celebs and studio moguls receive far greater publicity.
Of course, they also thought that because Al Gore spent a few months in Vietnam staring down the barrel of his own rifle, it would be a hot-button issue against Bush.
When she wears her hair all curly and just-so, I have a hard time telling her from a wet mop.
And another thing: just because it's inanimate is no excuse for advocating mop abuse.
Only in Hollyweird--Like Clinton beat Bush I--who served in WWII--cause he didn't serve in Vietnam?
Of course, they also thought that because Al Gore spent a few months in Vietnam staring down the barrel of his own rifle, it would be a hot-button issue against Bush.
After Clinton, no longer.
Hillary waits, wetting her pants in the wings.
Sophisticated? Stolid or taciturn, perhaps. Mule stupid, obviously. A party animal? Hardly. Maybe they ment to call him a sophist to honor his specious reasoning. That must be it.
Yup. Hillary has to have a tightly scripted, carefully controlled campaign. Otherwise, the mirror would crack. She controlled the NY press, but I don't know if she could do it on a national basis. Hillary's best bet is for an unfortunate accident to befall the Democratic nominee late in the campaign and for her to be proclaimed the saviour of the party at the last moment. Any bets on what sort of an unfortunate accident the Democratic party nominee for 2004 might encounter?
I concur. Everybody thought there was no way she could be elected Senator from New York. If the Republican Party could mess up that one, anything is possible.
The thing about John Kerry is he is from a state that would vote for the Democrat anyway. I'd rather see him run than risk Hillary winning.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.