Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Global warming evidence mounts - Flurry of reports show a withering ice cap
SF Chronicle ^ | 12-22-02 | David Perlman, Science Editor

Posted on 12/23/2002 3:27:41 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer

Edited on 04/13/2004 2:41:33 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

From the tropics to the poles, evidence is growing stronger than ever that Earth's climate is warming dangerously.

In the Arctic Ocean, floating masses of sea ice are shrinking and splitting apart, and the massive Greenland ice cap melted more this past summer than ever before. Meanwhile, warming ocean temperatures are endangering coral reefs in the tropics.


(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: allyourhotair; arebelongtous; global; globalwarminghoax; warming; weareallgonnadie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
VIRTUAL CLIMATE ALERT

December 19, 2002 Vol. 3, No. 36

As predictably as reclusive authors reappear on talk shows to flog their latest book or movie stars can be seen yucking it up with Jay Leno just before he coincidently runs a clip from their upcoming box office smash, right on cue, this last week, came the flurry of announcements that characterize this year’s average global temperature as the whatever-warmest-on-record. Somehow these announcements always manage to precede the actual end of the year when all of the data actually is in, but let’s run with this year’s declaration that 2002 is – as you’ve heard by now – "the second warmest on record," a record that extends back into the mid- to late-1800s."

[snip]

So where’s the proof of the statement that global warming is increasing ever faster? These annual pronouncements are revealed to be what they are: efforts to resuscitate a dimming paradigm, that humans’ use of fossil fuels results in carbon dioxide emissions that are disrupting earth’s climate.

...CONTINUE

1 posted on 12/23/2002 3:27:41 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
But of course, that refutation is from a *rightwing* source. </sarcasm>

There is no way to convince fools.
2 posted on 12/23/2002 3:37:55 AM PST by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
Truth or liberal BS? (I'm thinking more BS from the left...)
3 posted on 12/23/2002 3:40:58 AM PST by Jen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer; aculeus; general_re
"It is humans who are clearly forcing the abrupt climate change we see right now," said Richard B. Alley of Pennsylvania State University, who recently chaired a National Research Council committee looking specifically at climate change.

Used thus, clearly evokes Stalin's formula, "as is generally known."

4 posted on 12/23/2002 3:46:49 AM PST by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
The second warmest summer on record, dating back to the mid-1800's. Yeah, those were the days when we were using lots of fossil fuels.
5 posted on 12/23/2002 3:51:51 AM PST by meenie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reformedliberal
As long as we're being sarcastic, I hereby welcome the impending inundation of our coastal areas, which are inhabited primarily by Democrats. Presumably, instead of fleeing the rising waters, they will drown helplessly as they wait for the federal government to bail them out.

6 posted on 12/23/2002 3:54:41 AM PST by fastdraw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Gosh, I guess somebody should inform Florida about the shrinking ice caps, because apparently we don't know about this yet. I was at the beach the other day and the water was still in the same place...
7 posted on 12/23/2002 3:54:58 AM PST by ovrtaxt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
The Arctic's sea ice -- large masses of snow-covered ice that float everywhere around the polar latitudes -- usually covers 2.4 million square miles of the ocean north of Canada, Greenland and Russia in September, the height of the ice season.

Oh, yeah. I would have sworn that winter was the height of ice season, but then all I can do is look out the window. I don't have sophisticated computer models to tell me when winter arrives in the northern hemisphere.

8 posted on 12/23/2002 3:56:58 AM PST by metesky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Ah yes... more Liberal Chicken Littles; running in circles, flapping their wings and breathlessly clucking "The sky is warming, the sky is warming!"
9 posted on 12/23/2002 3:58:36 AM PST by LiberationIT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
I have a question......If there has already been a 20% erosion of the cap, why isn't there a bunch of shoreline already underwater? Wasn't that one of the claims of a melting ice cap?
10 posted on 12/23/2002 4:00:12 AM PST by irish guard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: irish guard
I have a question......If there has already been a 20% erosion of the cap, why isn't there a bunch of shoreline already underwater? Wasn't that one of the claims of a melting ice cap?

It's the junk science. I still remember (if this doesn't date me too much!) about the fears in the mid-70's about global COOLING, preceded by a "heightened" period of increased CO2 emissions and record warming. We're entering a new era, according to Bjorn Lomborg, but not one necessarily caused by human greenhouse gases.

11 posted on 12/23/2002 4:14:27 AM PST by alwaysconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: irish guard
I have a question......If there has already been a 20% erosion of the cap, why isn't there a bunch of shoreline already underwater? Wasn't that one of the claims of a melting ice cap?

I believe the effect of the ice in the Arctic icecap is already included in the current ocean levels -- it could all melt and ocean levels wouldn't rise one centimeter -- just like an ice cube melting in a glass of water won't raise the level of water in the glass. It is the melting of ice currently over land -- Greenland, Antarctica -- that will cause ocean levels to rise.

12 posted on 12/23/2002 4:19:12 AM PST by laredo44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
If the trends continue unchecked, scientists say, rising sea levels will drown coastlines. Droughts in some regions -- and increased rainfall in others -- will alter harvests drastically. And other climate disruptions will destabilize regional ecologies and global economies.

Well that's a safe bet. No matter what happens, if the world gets cooler, or warmer, or wetter, or dryer, there will be "droughts in some regions -- and increased rainfall in others -- will alter harvests drastically. And other climate disruptions will destabilize regional ecologies and global economies. Duh!

I'm in the wrong business. Do people get paid to write this drivel?

Hank

13 posted on 12/23/2002 4:30:25 AM PST by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Global Warming™ hype + media panic = endlessly increasing research grants
14 posted on 12/23/2002 4:39:56 AM PST by Fresh Wind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind
Record snowfall whitens Beijing
15 posted on 12/23/2002 4:44:18 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
I've posted this before, but it is appropriate to post this again, here. From the December 11, 2002 CO2 Science Magazine, written by Sherwood Keith and Craig Idso: There Has Been No Global Warming for the Past 70 Years], the Arctic - which according to essentially all climate models is supposed to be the harbinger of things to come for the rest of the world - is not yet as warm as it was in the late 1930s and early 1940s. In fact, because temperatures were so high for so long back then, the authors report that linear regression trends calculated from the 1920s to the present show a small but statistically significant cooling tendency.
16 posted on 12/23/2002 4:48:11 AM PST by jazerb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *Global Warming Hoax
Ah...The SF Comical, that paragon of unbiased reporting...
17 posted on 12/23/2002 5:41:42 AM PST by petuniasevan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: fastdraw
"Bail them out"....yuk yuk yuk.
18 posted on 12/23/2002 5:42:29 AM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Let me pose a simple question about this supposed global warming. So What? The earth has gone through countless cycles of warming and cooling long before humans arrived and it will go on through cycles long after we're gone.

If these Greenies and Liberals are so worried about global warming doesn't that just suggest that they are out of tune with nature and clinically averse to change. So what if over time the Mississippi valley becomes the rain-forest and Alaska looks like Los Angeles? We're human beings. The best among us adapt and move on. The species that can adapt will thrive and the others won't.

19 posted on 12/23/2002 5:49:12 AM PST by muir_redwoods
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
If this came out of San Francisco, it must be true!
20 posted on 12/23/2002 6:00:53 AM PST by Piquaboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson