Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cafe business up in smoke (smoking ban closes restaurant)
The Citizen Auburn NY ^ | Friday, December 20, 2002 | By Mary Bulkot / Staff Writer

Posted on 12/20/2002 10:10:51 AM PST by Behind Liberal Lines

SAVANNAH NY- A ban on smoking has snuffed the life out of their D&S Diner, Susan and Doug Devall say. The owners of the village's only diner, one of the few businesses on Main Street, say they will close for good Dec. 29. They blame Wayne County's no-smoking law, which passed in January.

We'd still be here, Doug Devall said, if the law hadn't passed.

The couple opened the diner in August 2000, after a string of businesses failed at the same location. Although the diner didn't turn a profit in its first year, the two expected to operate in the black the second year. Then the no-smoking law sent that goal go up in smoke. Nearby Cayuga County has no ban on smoking in restaurants, so the Devalls figure much of their business went to light up elsewhere. That took 30 percent of the customers right out of here, Doug Devall said.

Sales were down $3,000 in July 2002 compared to July 2001. Hardest hit were on Friday nights and Sunday mornings.

The couple had the option of converting an extra room into a smoking room, but the cost of installing ventilation, sealing doors and other measures was too much. Meanwhile, the two sympathized with their smoking customers and let them indulge under the counter, so to speak.

If it's not busy in here, I will let people smoke. I'm not going to lose my business, Susan Devall said soon after the law went into effect.

The decision to allow smoking or not should be left up to the individual business owner, Doug Devall said. Restaurant owners should be able to choose whether their establishment will be smoking or non-smoking.

The bottom line

Most of them are crying their eyes out because we're closing, but I can't keep robbing Peter to pay Paul, he said. The bottom line: He needs around $800 a day to survive, said the couple. It's the days when less than $100 comes in and then the propane truck pulls in and there's a $400 bill to pay, those are the days that hurt, he said.

This stuff is going to backfire on politicians, come back and bite them on the ass, Doug said, referring not only to the smoking laws but to the high taxes and other regulations that New York state imposes on small businesses. Workman's compensation, disability, unemployment, liability -- the cost of insurance is extremely high for a small business that employs two full-time and three part-time people.

Absolutely, said Sandy Brownell, when asked whether the new smoking laws have hurt many small restaurants like the D & S Diner.

Brownell is a saleswoman for Palmer Distributing, which is based in Newark. It's hard for them to make it in New York state because of the insurance regulations and the taxes as well, she said. I see it a lot, more than I wish to, she said about the closing.

Brownell is a smoker herself, and said whether she could light up or not weighed into her decision on where to eat.

Not just customers

It's the customers Susan will miss the most, especially the regulars. In a small place like this, though -- one of the few places for people to gather in Savannah -- most of the customers are regulars. In fact, several people sitting at the counter Thursday afternoon, after the lunch rush, had the look of regulars about them.

It's like art work for you, said Jackie Shurtleff, placing Leon Waldron's grilled ham and cheese sandwich in front of him.

Waldron comes to the diner at least once a day, usually to shoot the crap with all the guys in the morning and to pick on everyone.

So where will Waldron go after the new year?

Nowhere it seems.

I'm still coming here, they just don't know that yet, he said.

Tim Carmon, who works in Savannah and drops by at least three times a week for lunch, also hates to see them go.

Shurtleff is Sue's sister, as well as one of the diner's employees. She's worked at the diner since the day it opened.

Both of these facts make the closing an extremely emotional event for her as well as her sister. Upsetting was how she described the upcoming closing -- the simplicity of the words belied the complicated emotions felt.

Before he started working part-time at the diner, Randy Brown would come in with his father for lunch. Off duty Thursday afternoon, he sat at the counter eating what Jackie euphemistically called a concoction -- a Philly sandwich with extra cheese plus pickles, potato chips, and ketchup -- all on the sandwich, not on the side.

Brown has another part-time job at Pearl Technologies, but will miss the good atmosphere at the diner.

It's the environment that will be missed even more than the food. Mrs. Nobel, a Savannah resident whom Shurtleff described fondly as a fixture, has been coming to the diner morning and noon since it opened.

Nobel said the diner has the same friendly, pleasant extended family feeling as when Betty Kelly owned the building and operated a luncheonette there more than 20 years ago.

Nobel doesn't think there will be another business opening in the space anytime soon though -- a great loss for the village.

The diner will be sorely missed on Main Street, which has more empty storefronts than full ones. A couple of bars, a hair salon, a convenience store/gas station, the town hall. Given the limited amount of amenities and services available in this hamlet, most residents head to Seneca Falls or Auburn for basic necessities and entertainment.

This exodus will seemingly continue.

Future plans

There will be an auction in January, and then the Devalls will try to lease the space. Since they own the building, which has apartments upstairs, the couple's connection with the hamlet won't be totally severed.

Drink beer and raise hell, Doug said, when asked about his plans for the future. His contracting business will continue to take up most of his time.

But ultimately it's Sue, at the diner just about every day, who'll miss and be missed the most. Her husband joked his wife would be able to enjoy a stretch of being Suzy Homemaker.

Based on Sue's response to that suggestion, it doesn't seem likely.

Although the couple got smoked out of Savannah, figuratively speaking, Sue hasn't been totally burnt by the restaurant business. But she would consider something closer to home and in a higher traffic area, she said. In fact, with an eye on the future, the couple is tentatively keeping an eye on a place in Weedsport.

But the 29th is going to be pretty hard, Sue said.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; US: New York
KEYWORDS: cancer; dirtyhabit; governmentregulaton; pufflist; smokingban; sorelosers; tobacco
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 301-312 next last
To: ThomasJefferson
Is your point that you don't like smokers?

Some of my best friends are smokers and I even hired a token one this year.

81 posted on 12/20/2002 12:46:16 PM PST by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
Some of my best friends are smokers and I even hired a token one this year.

Goody, now what is your point?

82 posted on 12/20/2002 12:47:44 PM PST by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: wayoverontheright
Smokers are a minority, but smokers plus the number of people who are beginning to understand the fragility of our freedoms are, thankfully, a majority.

Something like 74% of nonsmokers in some Texas city wanted a town wide ban. I don't think there is anywhere nears a significant minority to support these smokers. They are politically toast. I believe that if the smoker managed to actually win a SC ruling on the property rights issue, that the people in the US would support an ammendment to the constitution.

83 posted on 12/20/2002 12:49:26 PM PST by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Just another Joe
Then after they kill the local economies they will blame it on Bush.
84 posted on 12/20/2002 12:49:57 PM PST by johnb838
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Doc Savage
Faux conservative.
85 posted on 12/20/2002 12:50:35 PM PST by zoyd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Rate_Determining_Step
I outlined the concept of government deriving it's power from the people and that's that's your retort?!

Give me one case that shows your analysis that the gov't doesn't have the power to regulate smoking in a restaurant. Just one, then we can discuss the legalities.

86 posted on 12/20/2002 12:50:51 PM PST by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: ThomasJefferson
One case. Just one.
87 posted on 12/20/2002 12:51:33 PM PST by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: kmiller1k
"So don't go on your moral high ground trip until you feel comfortable physically accosting smokers" Ahhh, we have found the cusp of the smokers fury...they feel morally inferior to non-smokers and are daily seeing their choice to smoke looked down upon by society (ie, the smoking bans) and are at their last gasp to feel normal within society.

Hahahah

Look sparky, would you feel confortable approaching a woman on the street and ripping the cigarette out of her mouth? Is that the type of guy you are? Or perhaps you would rather take mine?

I'm assuming that you'd say "No, I wouldn't do that. I don't have that right." However, people like you feel entitled to confer a right to government that you don't acknowledge you have. This is the ultimate in shrill cowardiss.

Or perhaps I'm wrong and you actually do take cigarettes away from people on the street. (As well as being on a first name basis with EMT physicians)

Certainly you're in the minority if that's the case. I don't smoke in restaurants, but have in bars and other adult venues, etc. I've never in such an establishment have had ANYBODY even ASK me to refrain from smoking. Yet you piously stand from afar and advocate these things.

Charming.
88 posted on 12/20/2002 12:52:56 PM PST by Rate_Determining_Step
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Just another Joe
I don't need to win my viewpoint in the market place. Smokers do.
89 posted on 12/20/2002 12:54:11 PM PST by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: ThomasJefferson
But on the contrary, I fight for peoples property rights 24/7. These regulations are wrong. Much as I like the outcomeI disagree with them. .

In all honesty it sounds like you're making progress with ol VWRC. Earlier this week he was on the fence, now he agrees the regs are wrong.
90 posted on 12/20/2002 12:55:53 PM PST by johnb838
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: kmiller1k
The true measure of addiction is how the individual acts when in the ABSENCE of their addictive substance. I think it is clear some on this thread are feeling afraid that that they may need to put the cigarettes away for the duration of a meal and are experiencing the waves of withdrawal even now just thinking about it

And I think it is clear some on this thread are feeling afraid that that they may need to put their tyrannical natures away for the duration of a meal and are experiencing the waves of withdrawal even now just thinking about it

91 posted on 12/20/2002 12:57:38 PM PST by laredo44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
As I have told you time and again, it's not about power, it's about LEGITIMATE power. Now go away, you made your point, that you hate smokers and are willing to excuse government for trampling their rights under any number of nonsensical reasons.
92 posted on 12/20/2002 1:00:37 PM PST by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Rate_Determining_Step
However, people like you feel entitled to confer a right to government that you don't acknowledge you have.

Heck, that's the American way. People without the cojones to go one on one let loose the force of Government all the time to stop others from doing things they don't like.

93 posted on 12/20/2002 1:00:46 PM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
I don't need to win my viewpoint in the market place. Smokers do.

No, you need the govt to ENFORCE your viewpoint using junk science, lies, and sheer audacity.
If left to the market people like you would be hunting for a non-smoking restaurant till the sun didn't come up again.
Either that or people like me would be looking for a smoking allowed restaurant for the same amount of time.
I'm happy with it either way as long as the BUSINESS OWNER chooses and not let the govt step in doing things that they should have no business (pun intended) doing.

94 posted on 12/20/2002 1:01:26 PM PST by Just another Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: johnb838
In all honesty it sounds like you're making progress with ol VWRC. Earlier this week he was on the fence, now he agrees the regs are wrong.

Tomorrow, he will be back here championing government intrusion again.

95 posted on 12/20/2002 1:02:00 PM PST by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
Mandated reporters like teachers and clergy will be required to advise DCF and you will get a visit. Ex-spouses will use your smoking to show your an unfit parent. This is the natural progression of the current events

And I bet you'd support them.

96 posted on 12/20/2002 1:03:31 PM PST by Bella_Bru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Doc Savage
Personally, I like my air as clean as I can get it, and so do millions of other Americans.

Then you should have no issue with taxing heavily polluting vehicles either.

97 posted on 12/20/2002 1:04:26 PM PST by Bella_Bru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
Give me one case that shows your analysis that the gov't doesn't have the power to regulate smoking in a restaurant. Just one, then we can discuss the legalities.

I concede that socialist have eroded freedom to where someone can't have the kind of restaurant they want. These people have successfully argued that a private restaurant is not private at all, but "public".

I maintain that this power is illegitimate. I have proved it to you by my "calling you out" to act upon this agenda in person by accosting smokers on the street.

Just because a law or power to regulate exists doesn't mean it's right. Of course, this is entirely lost on pinkos and other blue-nosed lefties.
98 posted on 12/20/2002 1:04:30 PM PST by Rate_Determining_Step
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
Make all your points on one post, then people can see where you are coming from instead of playing your fifth grade game of "guess my postion".

Then it can be discarded by anyone who chooses.

99 posted on 12/20/2002 1:05:04 PM PST by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
The couple opened the diner in August 2000, after a string of businesses failed at the same location.

Plus a recession.

100 posted on 12/20/2002 1:06:54 PM PST by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 301-312 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson