Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Meet Bill Frist: Senator championed confirmation of pro-abortion Satcher
WorldNetDaily ^ | 12-19-02 | Joseph Farrah

Posted on 12/19/2002 9:01:50 PM PST by Salvation

Meet Bill Frist –
heir to Lott throne

Senator championed confirmation
of pro-abortion Satcher, fights fat


Posted: December 19, 2002
9:30 p.m. Eastern

By Joseph Farah
© 2002 WorldNetDaily.com

WASHINGTON – Everyone knows Sen. Bill Frist, R-Tenn., is the upper house's only physician. But who is this man who appears likely to become the next Senate majority leader?

Opponents of abortion on demand are likely to be deeply disappointed. While Trent Lott, R-Miss., had promised to bring to the floor for a quick, early vote a bill restricting partial-birth abortion, Frist championed the nomination by President Clinton of former Surgeon General David Satcher, a fervent supporter of unrestricted abortion and someone who actually performed abortions.

Satcher continued to serve in the Bush administration until earlier this year.

While Satcher's nomination was widely presumed to have originated with Vice President Al Gore, like Satcher, a Tennessean, his confirmation was actually championed by Frist.

Frist once told National Public Radio that there are no absolute right, absolute wrong answers in medicine. During last year's stem-cell debate, Frist proposed using leftover embryos from in vitro fertilization clinics for scientific research. The Weekly Standard also noted that Frist believes there is a moral imperative to use one unsalvageable life to save another.

Frist's other pet causes while serving in the Senate have been fighting AIDS in Africa and fighting obesity among Americans. He believes the federal government needs to increase funding of physical education programs in school. He thinks spending $125 million on a Centers for Disease Control program encouraging children to engage in athletics is another top priority.

He sponsored a bill earlier this year that would have authorized a nationwide ad campaign to promote better nutrition and exercise and would have authorized money for bicycle paths, parks and recreation centers.

According to sources close to the White House, Frist has been favored by Bush political adviser Karl Rove to take the helm of the Senate Republicans ever since Lott got himself embroiled in controversy with his remarks at Sen. Strom Thurmond's 100th birthday party.

Now Frist reportedly is considering a bid to oust Lott.

According to the Associated Press, GOP aides say Frist, now in his second term, is gauging support from his colleagues, having spent time sounding them out by telephone.


Sen. Bill Frist

One aide, speaking on condition of anonymity, said Frist would consider running for the job if colleagues asked him to do so "for the sake of the Senate as an institution or the long-term agenda of the Republican Party.''

In a sign that Frist might be building momentum, a Republican aide close to No. 2 Senate Republican Don Nickles of Oklahoma said Nickles would likely support a race by Frist.

Nickles, a longtime rival of Lott, believes he would have less support from colleagues than Frist for majority leader, the aide said.

Meanwhile, Lott sustained a double-barreled setback this week as Sen. Lincoln Chafee, R-R.I., broke ranks to call for a change in party leadership and Secretary of State Colin Powell forcefully criticized his controversial remarks on race.

"I believe it's time to make a change," Chafee told reporters in his home state. "I think the process is happening," he said, encouraging the White House to step in to help ease Lott from power.

Powell, the highest-ranking African American in the Bush administration, made his first comments on a controversy that flared this month when Lott spoke favorably of Sen. Strom Thurmond's segregationist presidential campaign of a half-century ago.

"If the rest of the country had followed our lead, we wouldn't have had all these problems over all these years either," Lott said at Thurmond's 100th birthday.

"I was disappointed in the senator's statement," Powell said. "I deplored the sentiments behind the statement."

"There was nothing about the 1948 election or the Dixiecrat agenda that should have been acceptable in any way to any American at that time or any American now."

Lott has maintained a defiant pose, insisting he would fight for his job at a Jan. 6 meeting of GOP rank and file senators and swiping at suggestions from anonymous officials with ties to the White House that he step down.

"There seems to be some things that are seeping out that have not been helpful," he said in Biloxi, Miss. "I understand how that happens because you've got a lot of people who work there that have different points of view," he told reporters.

"But I believe they do support what I am trying to do here and the president will continue to do so."

As WorldNetDaily reported earlier, nearly two-thirds of Americans believe Lott should be replaced as Republican leader, according to the results of a new survey.

Sixty-two percent say GOP senators should replace Lott when they meet Jan. 6, compared to just 18 percent who think he should remain the party's senate chief.

First winning entry to the Senate in 1994, Frist was re-elected in 2000 by the largest margin ever received by a candidate for statewide election in Tennessee history. He's the first practicing physician elected to the chamber since 1928.

A native of Nashville, Frist founded and subsequently directed the Vanderbilt Transplant Center, which became an internationally renowned center of multi-organ transplantation. He's performed some 200 heart and lung transplants and has written more than 100 articles, chapters and abstracts on medical research, as well as three books.

Related stories:

Poll: Most want Lott replaced

Lott's daughter hits back at segregationist


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abortion; abortionlist; catholiclist; frist; lameoneissuejerks; lott; monomania; nhs; notpureenough; nuttylitmustests; physician; prolife; senate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 301-306 next last
To: John Valentine

Sounds like you're upset..

Maybe you should quit and go to the Constitution party with your objections, or perhaps become a Libertarian.

I can provide links if you would like..

101 posted on 12/19/2002 10:08:15 PM PST by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
Agressive use of the Bully Pulpit, number one.

Second, judicious and selective currying of sympathetic press, JUST like the DemonRats did for forty years. It isn't just by accident that they got this way, they evolved this way to survive in a Democrat dominated Washington.

Let's show them what it takes to survive in a Republican dominated Washington.

Just what the hell IS Helen Thomas doing in those White House press briefings, anyway?
102 posted on 12/19/2002 10:08:54 PM PST by John Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
I will have to stick with Lott!

Hey, like I always say, wait till the fat lady sings!
103 posted on 12/19/2002 10:09:27 PM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Noumenon
I'm becoming more and more convinced of that by the day. The immediate kneejerk bowing to the PC Gods after Lott stuck his foot up his arse taught me a lesson. All that social conservatism is pure bullshite from Bush on down.

Now...they do fight good wars and maybe they'll lower taxes so they beat the alternative by a country mile/

Not a Ronaldus Magnus in sight sans DeLay.
104 posted on 12/19/2002 10:10:02 PM PST by wardaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine
I don't reaally understand why these "pro-lifers" are infesting the Republican Party at all, since it seems to me that they would be far more politically in tune with the do-gooders and social experimenters over at the Socialist International.

You obviously don't know a thing about the makeup of the GOP. It is the prolife party, and it has been since Reagan. The vast majority of the delegates to the national convention are ardent prolifers, as is the nominating electorate for President.

Might I suggest that your views are almost entirely those of the Democrat Party, and not the GOP...because that is a fact.

105 posted on 12/19/2002 10:10:08 PM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
Nah,,, We have a big tent Party. I'll stay where I am.

This was my Party long before you guys showed up.
106 posted on 12/19/2002 10:10:09 PM PST by John Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
"My guys" were not tarring and feather him; they merely wouldn't come out and defend him when he refused to denouce segregation.

Don't forget, he had THREE chances to denouce it before he got to BET and never did.

107 posted on 12/19/2002 10:10:12 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
He supported segregation, and when it ended, continued to pander below the radar screen to groups that regretted its end, even while on the radar screen, he ignored the issue, and never got around to exorcising his past - until now. I just don't think racist is the right word to use about Lott, and will not use it. But I could use enough words to suggest that the GOP caucus should seriously consider replacing him. But that is their decision, not mine.
108 posted on 12/19/2002 10:11:02 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
"But if, as part of that 1%, he did five or ten, well, hell, that's only five or ten, right?"

So no doctor can perform an abortion no matter what?

Read what your saying man because you're sounding a little freeky ?

109 posted on 12/19/2002 10:11:17 PM PST by america-rules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
He's in like Flynn Todd.
110 posted on 12/19/2002 10:11:57 PM PST by ApesForEvolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
While Trent Lott, R-Miss., had promised to bring to the floor for a quick, early vote a bill restricting partial-birth abortion, Frist championed the nomination by President Clinton of former Surgeon General David Satcher, a fervent supporter of unrestricted abortion and someone who actually performed abortions.

Satcher continued to serve in the Bush administration until earlier this year.

While Satcher's nomination was widely presumed to have originated with Vice President Al Gore, like Satcher, a Tennessean, his confirmation was actually championed by Frist.

Frist once told National Public Radio that there are no absolute right, absolute wrong answers in medicine. During last year's stem-cell debate, Frist proposed using leftover embryos from in vitro fertilization clinics for scientific research. The Weekly Standard also noted that Frist believes there is a moral imperative to use one unsalvageable life to save another.

.....
so you would support an abortion supporter over one that is about to get rid of PB ABORTION?
111 posted on 12/19/2002 10:12:05 PM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
I didn't vote for him this last time because he did lie about being pro-life in his first campaign. I called and asked him (many years ago during the Clinton administration) which way he was going to vote on the Henry Foster nomination for surgeon general. I also wrote several times and never could get a straight answer. I figured I knew which way he would vote, but didn't appreciate it because Foster had performed partial birth abortions, and when Frist campaigned against Sasser he clearly marked that he was pro-life on his flyers. He is also big into harvesting humans out like crops for their stem cells, which I find as morally reprehensible as abortion.

I think he's a lousy choice for Majority leader, but he'll probably get it. He got 80% of the vote here for his senate run. I sat out.

112 posted on 12/19/2002 10:12:07 PM PST by JMJ333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
I meant to include you in my post with sinkspur. Thanks for the thread. =)
113 posted on 12/19/2002 10:12:45 PM PST by JMJ333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Torie
continued to pander below the radar screen to groups that regretted its end

I have the feeling that that right there is exactly why he didn't come right out and denouce segregation the very first day -- $$$$$.

114 posted on 12/19/2002 10:13:00 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine
**I don't reaally understand why these "pro-lifers" are infesting the Republican Party at all, since it seems to me that they would be far more politically in tune with the do-gooders and social experimenters over at the Socialist International.**

I don't think so. Read this poem and think about it for awhile.

"First they came for the Jews
and I did not speak out --
because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for the communists
and I did not speak out --
because I was not a communist.
Then they came for the trade unionists
and I did not speak out --
because I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for me --
and there was no one left to speak out for me."
~~Pastor Martin Niemoller
(victim of the Nazis)

Is there anything we can learn from this?
When they came for the Catholics?
When they came for the Baptists?
When they came for the fundamentalists?
When they came for the babies?

Just something for all of us to think about -- is this picture larger than we currently see it?

115 posted on 12/19/2002 10:13:18 PM PST by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
You are very very worng.

There is NOTHING about the Democrats that I can find common cause with.

The core values of the Republican party were hammered out in MY heartland. Hell, the Republican Party was FOUNDED in my home town of Camillus, New York. You can't tell me ANYTHING about the Republicans, my man.
116 posted on 12/19/2002 10:13:34 PM PST by John Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
I particularly enjoyed Elders' comments on Education.

As usual, the worst of the Dems can trace their Talking Points to the GOP:


The Task Force is committed to the development of a national population policy. We believe education, family planning services, contraceptive research and development as well as transportation, and community planning and development should be important components of such policy.

Before we can begin to remedy a problem, we must first realize that we have one.

Despite the increased interest regarding this problem, there is still a vast number of Americans who are unfamiliar with even the most essential understanding of this potentially dangerous population growth rate.

The Task Force feels that one of the most important functions of the federal government is to supply the public with the latest and most accurate data.


Recommendations of the Task Force on Earth Resources and Population (George H. Bush, Chairman) 1970

117 posted on 12/19/2002 10:14:26 PM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine
I don't reaally understand why these "pro-lifers" are infesting the Republican Party at all,

Well, chase 'em off, and the Republican Party won't win jack-sh*t in your lifetime.

I actually like Bill Frist and think he'll make a pretty decent Leader.

Lott wasn't my first choice, but he votes consistently conservative, and I think he's being railroaded out on a flimsy pretext. And, what's most galling, are all the "conservatives" who are calling for his head because they've got swollen hemorrhoids over impeachment.

Now, because Lott, Bush, and the "canonized conservatives" stayed silent, we've got "racist" hung around our necks.

It could have been dealt with, but all this white guilt has these Yankee Republicans wringing their hands and looking for someone to string up.

Lott'll do, though he's not the last.

118 posted on 12/19/2002 10:14:52 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine
"Nah,,, We have a big tent Party. I'll stay where I am.
This was my Party long before you guys showed up."

You should try to be a little more understanding.
These guys were delayed in showing up because they needed the permission of Mullah Omar to get a leave of absence from the Taliban.
119 posted on 12/19/2002 10:15:10 PM PST by APBaer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: ApesForEvolution
You know the fighting between old friends over a Karl Rove back stabbing isn't pretty is it?
120 posted on 12/19/2002 10:15:13 PM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 301-306 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson