Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How to Ruin American Enterprise
Forbes Magazine ^ | December 13, 2002 | Ben Stein

Posted on 12/16/2002 11:36:34 AM PST by tdadams

We're well on our way to squelching what gives this country an edge. What would it take to kill innovation altogether?

As a casual observer of what makes this country work and what stops it cold, I hereby offer a few suggestions on how we can ruin American competitiveness and innovation in the course of this century. I think the reader will agree with me that we are already far down the road on many of them:

1) Allow schools to fall into useless decay. Do not teach civics or history except to describe America as a hopelessly fascistic, reactionary pit. Do not expect students to know the basics of mathematics, chemistry and physics. Working closely with the teachers' unions, make sure that you dumb down standards so that children who make the most minimal effort still get by with flying colors. Destroy the knowledge base on which all of mankind's scientific progress has been built by guaranteeing that such learning is confined to only a few, and spread ignorance and complacency among the many. Watch America lose its scientific and competitive edge to other nations that make a comprehensive knowledge base a rule of the society.

2) Encourage the making of laws and rules by trial lawyers and sympathetic judges, especially through class actions. Bypass the legislative mechanisms that involve elected representatives and a president. This will stop--or at least greatly slow down--innovation, as corporations and individuals hesitate to explore new ideas for fear of getting punished (or regulated to death) by litigation for any misstep, no matter how slight, in the creation of new products and services. Make sure that lawsuits against drugmakers are especially encouraged so that the companies are afraid to develop new lifesaving drugs, lest they be sued for sums that will bankrupt them. Make trial lawyers and judges, not scientists, responsible for the flow of new products and services.

3) Create a culture that blames the other guy for everything and discourages any form of individual self-restraint or self-control. Promote litigation to punish tobacco companies on the theory that they compel innocent people to smoke. Make it second nature for someone who is overweight to blame the restaurant that served him fries. Encourage a legal process that can kill a drug company for any mistakes in self-medication. Make it a general rule that anyone with more money than a plaintiff is responsible for anything harmful that a plaintiff does. Promulgate the pitiful joke that Americans are hereby exempt from any responsibility for their own actions--so long as there are deep pockets around to be rifled.

4) Sneer at hard work and thrift. Encourage the belief that all true wealth comes from skillful manipulation and cunning, or from sudden, brilliant and lucky strokes that leave the plodding, ordinary worker and saver in the dust. Make sure that society's idols are men and women who got rich from being sexy in public or through gambling or playing tricks, not from hard work or patience. Make the citizenry permanently envious and bewildered about where real success comes from.

5) Hold the managers of corporations to extremely lax standards of conduct and allow them to get off with a slap on the wrist when they betray the trust of shareholders. This will discourage thrift and investment and ensure that Americans will have far less capital to work with than other societies, while simultaneously developing that contempt for law and social standards that is the hallmark of failing nations. Hold the management of labor unions to no ethical standards.

6) While you're at it, discourage respect for law in every possible way. This will dissolve the glue that holds the nation together, and dissuade any long-term thinking. Societies in which the law can be clearly seen to apply to some and not to others are doomed to decay, in terms of innovation and everything else.

7) Encourage a mass culture that spits on intelligence and study and instead elevates drug use, coolness through sex and violence, and contempt for school. As children learn to be stupid instead of smart, the national intelligence base needed for innovation will simply vanish into MTV-land.

8) Mock and belittle the family. Provide financial incentives to people willing to live an isolated existence, vulnerable and frightened. This guarantees that men and women of sufficient character to bring about innovation will be psychologically stifled from an early age.

9) Develop a suicidal immigration policy that keeps out educated, hardworking men and women from friendly nations and, instead, takes in vast numbers of angry, uneducated immigrants from nations that hate us. This, too, leads to the shrinking of our knowledge base and the eventual disappearance of social cohesion.

10) Enact a tax system that encourages class antagonism and punishes saving, while rewarding indebtedness, frivolity and consumption. Tax the fruits of labor many times:

First tax it as income. Then tax it as real or personal property. Then tax it as capital gains. Then tax it again, at a staggeringly high level, at death. This way, Americans are taught that only fools save, and that it is entirely proper for us to have the lowest savings rate in the developed world. This will deprive us of much-needed capital for new investment, for innovation and our own personal aspirations. It will compel us to ask foreigners for ever more capital and allow them to own more of America. It will also promote an attitude of carelessness about the future and, once again, encourage disrespect for law.

11) Have a socialized medical system that scrimps on badly needed drugs and procedures, resorts to only the cheapest practices and discourages drug companies from developing new drugs by not paying them enough to cover their costs of experimentation, trial and error.

12) Elevate mysticism, tribalism, shamanism and fundamentalism--and be sure to exclude educated, hardworking men and women--to an equal status with technology in the public mind. Make sure that, in order to pay proper (and politically correct) respect to all different ethnic groups in America, you act as if science were on an equal footing with voodoo and history with ethnic fable.

My list need not end here. But I stopped at a dozen because I realized that this is already, in large measure, the program of so many of our elected representatives. The debauchery of our tort system is already in place, and the rest of the agenda is under way.

Benjamin J. Stein is a lawyer, economist, writer and actor, and host of the game show Win Ben Stein's Money.




TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: classwarfare; culturaldecline; immigration; investing; judicialactivism; litigation; publicschools; regulation; saving; socializedmedicine; taxation; triallawyers; welfare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: joanie-f
I think you're right about the lack of personal responsibility being the root cause. But what caused the lack of responsibility?

My theory is that thanks to the Carter inflation, somewhere in the mid 80's it became almost impossible for a one-earner family to make ends meet. About that time many mothers went to work and dumped their young children off in "day-care". The government has helped that along by providing subsidies - and reaps the benefit of two tax payers in the place of one.

We have a whole generation now that was brought up by other than their birth parents. They were never disciplined properly (or at all); They were never loved properly.

There was a better way.

41 posted on 12/18/2002 3:50:13 AM PST by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
John, I agree with your (between the lines) assessment of the day care generation. But, at the same time, I believe that perhaps ninety percent of families today who claim that they ‘cannot make ends meet’ on one salary have ‘ends’ which are too extravagant for the well-being of their children. And, despite the economic hardship of the inflationary Carter years, I believe it may have been true, although maybe to a lesser degree, back then as well.

I believe that a mother’s role in the life of a child (especially a very young child) is more important than anything else in that child’s life. If, in order for a mother to serve as the primary role model and nurturer for her child, avoiding the ‘two salary’ pitfall requires a family to live in even a one-bedroom apartment (rather than a three bedroom picket-fence home), and drive one old car (rather than two new ones), and eat two meager (rather than three abundant) meals a day, then I say that child who spends his early years being lovingly nurtured in a one-bedroom, one-old-car, two-meal-a-day home not only knows deep maternal love in his early years, but he is also learning the valuable, character building lesson of what it means to do without.

Even though, to his day-care-raised classmates, he may appear materially deprived, he is really experiencing the best of both worlds: fulltime parental emotional support and nurturing, and temporary material deprivation. And I truly believe that children raised in somewhat materially deprived conditions tend to build lifelong character, which, in their later years serves them well, and which, more often than not, leads to a strong work ethic, and eventual material success (and appreciation of that success as well).

I like your Carter era theory, but I think it goes back farther, and runs deeper, than that.

If it were necessary to lay the blame for lack of personal responsibility (and the many society-destroying tentacles that that fatal characteristic engenders) at the feet of only one source, I would in all seriousness lay it at the feet of Dr. Benjamin Spock (and, in particular, his mega best-selling child-rearing Bible, Baby and Child Care). That unfortunate book (which spawned many copy-cat leftist, feminist child-rearing publications), is still the best-selling book in North America -- second only to the Bible.

His book was published in, of all times, 1946 – as the postwar baby boom was beginning – so the number of new bodies and minds which were affected by his liberal child-rearing philosophy couldn’t have been greater.

Without going into the gory details of his philosophy on child rearing, the putting into practice of that philosophy by tens of millions of American families, both immediately post-war, and for the decades that followed (up to this very day) has contributed more to a generation (and now two) of callous, me-oriented, irresponsible adult human beings than any other factor in our history.

As Robert Bork observed in his Slouching Towards Gomorrah, ‘every new generation constitutes a wave of savages who must be civilized by their families, schools, and churches.’ Beginning post-war, and continuing to reverberate like a eternal, mocking gong, Spock, and his baby care bible, instructed American parents not to civilize their children, but to teach them that (1) there is no work/reward correlation, (2) they are the center of their world and others’ wants and needs are pretty much irrelevant, and (3) men and women are really not all that different from each other (although, due to negative societal stereotypes, men tend to wield too much power over women and children).

Those who read, and accepted those theories presented in, his book learned to ignore the beautiful instinctual aspect of parenting, and following the fabricated (leftist) intellectuall parenting mantra.

Those who read, and accepted those theories presented in, his book learned to raise narcissistic children who had little or no sense of responsibility, and who knew few or no repercussions as a result of aberrant/lazy/destructive/self-centered behavior. When such children grow into adulthood, and are passed the national moral and ethical leadership baton (witness the Clinton coterie), the nation whose future rests on their particular brand of superficial, self-oriented, lacking-in-knowledge-or-appreciation-of-their-roots decision-making and example is in grave peril.

To borrow .... and bend .... a phrase from Lincoln (spoken in another context, but appropriate here as well), such a nation cannot long endure ....

42 posted on 12/18/2002 8:20:55 AM PST by joanie-f
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: joanie-f
Oh, you're quite right about the priorities of raising a family vs. having "things". But one gets used to a certain lifestyle and expects it to continue; I know I have fallen victim to that mirage; You do what you think you "have to do" (you really don't) to maintain it at all costs, and convince yourself that the children won't notice that you're not there.

About a year ago I posted the perfect piece on this. Gimme's a sec and maybe I can find it...

Nope, no luck. I just hate it that FR has closed itself to google.com, either intentionally or accidentally.

Of course we haven't mentioned the role of television - the modern equivalent of the nanny - in the decline of American culture.

43 posted on 12/18/2002 12:58:40 PM PST by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
Good job setting Bob straight. I read every word of the sylabus and was appalled by the films alone. I was shocked at the responses to you that saw nothing wrong with the focus of this "history class."

My high school graduating class (1969) was probably one of the last to focus on history from a pro-American perspective.
44 posted on 12/19/2002 9:59:15 AM PST by rohry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: smalltown
"Sorry, but I don't see a whole lot wrong with the syllabus."

Then you didn't look close enough. If you check out the films ALONE you can see the (not so) hidden agenda of the Marxist that runs this course. Take the film names and do a Google search on them:

http://www.google.com/
45 posted on 12/19/2002 10:03:43 AM PST by rohry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: joanie-f
An ancient bump - I just happened on your post now doing a Google search for "spock child rearing marxist".

Good post, Joanie. Thanks.

46 posted on 06/12/2004 12:44:41 PM PDT by ThePythonicCow (I was humble, before I was born. -- J Frondeur Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: tdadams
All that comes down to one word...multiculturalism.

Every culture has had its Kings and every culture has had its slaves. Every culture has its customs, beliefs and core values. But for multiculturism to exist there must be mutual respect...BOTH WAYS.

Otherwise, when forced to co-exist, it's like holding two cats up face-to-face...chances are, they're gonna fight.

Taking from one group and giving it to another is not going to promote multiculturism...it only creates resentment, greed, and crime...and chances are, they're gonna fight.

Again, policies pushed by liberals never take the "human nature" angle into account, therefore will never succeed for very long.
47 posted on 06/12/2004 1:02:06 PM PDT by FrankR (You are only enslaved to the extent of charity that you receive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson