Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How To Defeat Gay Arguements
Junto Society ^ | 12/14/2002 | Scott Douglas Lively

Posted on 12/14/2002 12:22:41 PM PST by stoney

How to Defeat "Gay" Arguments Written by Scott Douglas Lively, Esq.

Provided by Bob Sperlazzo Informed Christian Digest 12/14/2002

There is no shame in believing a lie until you learn the truth.

.

The success of so-called "gay rights" is an amazing triumph of clever deception over simple logic. When it comes to this issue, otherwise intelligent people routinely fall for arguments that just don't hold up under scrutiny. "Gay" sympathizers aren't necessarily more gullible than other people, they are simply tricked into accepting certain conclusions without first examining the underlying premises.

.

He who defines the terms controls the debate -- and by extension, public opinion. On this issue the terms have been defined (in many cases invented) by the talented sophists of the "gay" movement.

.

Sophistry, it must be noted, is the ancient Greek art of persuasion by subtly false reasoning. The key to overcoming sophistry is to simplify and clarify what the sophists have intentionally made complex and vague. That process begins by defining the terms and concepts being used in the arguments. One quickly discovers that most arguments advocating "gay rights" depend upon hidden false assumptions and deliberately ambiguous terms. It's all smoke and mirrors.

.

Among the most common terms and concepts in the "gay rights" debate are: homosexuality, sexual orientation, heterosexism, diversity, multi-culturalism, inclusiveness, discrimination, homophobia and tolerance. These words and phrases are used by "gay" sophists to frame the question of homosexuality as a civil rights issue. It is a context chosen to favor homosexuals to the

(Excerpt) Read more at juntosociety.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: gay; homosexual; homosexualagenda; queer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 last
To: yendu bwam
Amen!!!
101 posted on 12/16/2002 1:31:45 PM PST by glory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: poet
Too Funny! LOL!
102 posted on 12/16/2002 1:39:19 PM PST by wjcsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: yendu bwam
"I have a right to determine who will and who will not be alone and in close quarters with my sons.

We are in agreement here. It is your personal choice to keep your children out of harms way. And putting children in the company of sexual predators in not a prudent thing to do. Just as we would not want our children on a school bus with a driver that is loaded.

103 posted on 12/16/2002 4:04:43 PM PST by hove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Stone Mountain
"isn't cool to denigrate a child for something he had no control over."

Agreed as far as the child goes.....as to what one has no control over(what did the parents "lose" control of?),don't think I am willing to let most 'off the hook' with that as an excuse regarding most things in normal life.

104 posted on 12/16/2002 4:56:54 PM PST by litehaus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio
What do you mean "real historians?" Considering the politicization of the current and preivous crops of academicians, the phrase "real historians" somehow doesn't thrill me!!! The Pink Swastika had many footnotes, contained many quotes from other, major historical works, and seems to this non-scholar to be authoritative. READ it - the updated version - before judging it!
105 posted on 12/16/2002 5:05:30 PM PST by First Amendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

Comment #106 Removed by Moderator

To: Yehuda
What was the purpose of repeating my words?
107 posted on 12/16/2002 10:56:56 PM PST by Dimensio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: yendu bwam
Bump -- well said
108 posted on 12/17/2002 6:18:06 AM PST by EdReform
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

Comment #109 Removed by Moderator

To: litehaus
I wasn't trying to make a blanket statement - just explain why the term bastard isn't in vogue these days...
110 posted on 12/17/2002 9:55:53 AM PST by Stone Mountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: stoney

Fags are inbreds who want to screw their mommy and daddy. How many straight women have you heard that can switch their horniness on a dime and screw other women. How many straight women can switch sides just by being misled by a dyke. How stupid are these women. I have heard fags joke about how easy it is to hoodwink a straight woman into being gay just by saying heterosexuality is socially conditioned. Well so is homosexuality. I would say most homos grew up from homo friendly parents.


111 posted on 05/15/2005 12:39:21 AM PDT by sexyd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson