Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/12/2002 8:38:40 AM PST by jalisco555
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: jalisco555
This is a joke, right?
2 posted on 12/12/2002 8:42:59 AM PST by sam_paine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jalisco555
The Canadians have the same problems with the leftists that we do. The fact that leftists are lying sorry sacks of sh*t is universal.
4 posted on 12/12/2002 8:50:14 AM PST by wjcsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jalisco555
They're comin' for our "Daisys" boys! ...This is when some cannuck govt official would get a pellet in the perverbial arse.
5 posted on 12/12/2002 8:54:38 AM PST by Ranger Drew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jalisco555
I would urge any decent, freedom-loving Canadians to disobey these stupid, immoral leftist laws. Throw sand in the gears of this corrupt regime whenever possible. It's time to start thinking of ways to evade the payment of taxes as well. The Canadian government is a corrupt, terrorist-supporting state. Who is it up there that keeps on putting these dangerous fools in office? Is the country populated by feminists and emasculated leftist males?
9 posted on 12/12/2002 9:13:32 AM PST by Bogolyubski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jalisco555
Gun prohibitionists shrug off rising problems with gang violence, saying that this legislation was targeted at normal people who misuse firearms, not criminals.

What?...

10 posted on 12/12/2002 9:15:33 AM PST by MileHi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jalisco555
I saved this article, so that anytime I start to get depressed about how screwed up the U.S. government is these days, I'll have something to remind me how much worse it could be.

If this article is anywhere close to true, it describes a government that is both dysfunctional and does not represent the will of the Canadian people in any credible way. Of course, it may be a bit overdone, but it's hard to overemphasize how such things as having a PM-appointed Senate and MPs subject to dismissal by party leaders (not the electorate) must isolate the people from their government.

11 posted on 12/12/2002 9:26:13 AM PST by Imal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jalisco555
Gun prohibitionists shrug off rising problems with gang violence, saying that this legislation was targeted at normal people who misuse firearms, not criminals

This has got to be one of the stupidest statements that I have ever seen. Logic has nothing to do with a liberal. Pure emotion only, which is the currency of fools.

12 posted on 12/12/2002 9:31:27 AM PST by cmak9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jalisco555
Thanks for posting this.
13 posted on 12/12/2002 9:37:22 AM PST by NEWwoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jalisco555
Some things in this article bear repeating:

Gun prohibitionists shrug off rising problems with gang violence, saying that this legislation was targeted at normal people who misuse firearms, not criminals. [...]

In Canada, registered gun owners must report a change of address to the police, but convicted violent felons do not. Registered gun owners must surrender their privacy, consenting to government "inspections" of their home to verify registry information. While the government makes inaccurate lists of who owns which gun, the Correctional Service lacks the funds to track parolees who fail to report. [...]

Chrétien's dilatory attitude towards violent criminals and his fierce attitude towards gun owners mimic his policy toward terrorism. [...]

This article outlines what have become universal hallmarks of gun prohibition regimes.

In my opinion, such regimes are a greater threat to a free society than any form of terrorism will ever be, since terrorism tends to galvanize a society, while "gun control" divides and conquers it, insidiously working from within, like a virus.

The terrible plight of the "Commonwealths of the Crown" should be warning enough for those who would advocate that the United States emulate them.

14 posted on 12/12/2002 9:43:22 AM PST by Imal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jalisco555
You reap what you sow.
15 posted on 12/12/2002 9:44:27 AM PST by YoungKentuckyConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jalisco555
How much you wanna bet that in time they will throw up their hands at the expense and outlaw gun ownership in Canada.
16 posted on 12/12/2002 9:59:11 AM PST by 3catsanadog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jalisco555; Great Dane; liliana; Alberta's Child; Entropy Squared; Rightwing Canuck; Loyalist; ...
As 8 of the 10 provinces have refused to operate the registry, the system is being run directly by the Feds, and I suspect that they hired the Mackenzie Brothers to run it.
27 posted on 12/12/2002 3:37:56 PM PST by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson