Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The (Eastern) Roman Empire still dominates global space (No African Equivalent Says African)
East African Standard Online Edition ^ | Friday, November 1, 2002 | Dominic Odipo

Posted on 11/27/2002 2:58:42 PM PST by Destro

The Roman Empire still dominates global space

By Dominic Odipo

The Roman Empire in the East which, for a thousand years, was centred upon the great city of Constantinople, has officially been dead for five hundred years.

Yet, in so many ways, this empire, the greatest the world has ever seen, still lives. Its architecture dominates our perceptions of space and structure; its political philosophy determines the manner in which we regulate the relationships between our peoples and our nation states; and its law and jurisprudence are still taught and read in all the universities of the Western world.

In fact, it is virtually impossible to understand and truly appreciate the modern world if we do not understand the legacy of the Roman Empire, especially that branch of it which was ruled from Constantinople.

During the rule of Emperor Justinian (527 565 A.D), life in Constantinople revolved around the city’s great circus, where passions soared over the chariot races that absorbed the minds of the citizens.

Rival factions - the Blues and the Greens- yelled themselves hoarse in support of their favourite charioteers, like crowds at a modern soccer cup tie, but with a difference.

Their rivalry over these charioteers was carried into every branch of life. The Blues and the Greens took sides on every issue under the sun and their differences often paralysed the great city.

This lunatic attitude of the population once nearly drove Emperor Justinian out of the city; only the rare courage of his wife, Theodora, persuaded him to stay and quell the rioters.

Justinian re-built the great and lovely cathedral of Santa Sophia and, through Tribonian, the Roman lawyer, he collected into one great system all the laws and legal precedents that had grown up with the Roman state.

The days were at hand when the world was to have little use for law; Justinian secured that it would not be altogether lost, and that, when men should grow tired of the rule of force, they should find in his codes the record of a better way.

Today, St. Sophia still stands in Constantinople, now the Turkish city of Istanbul. No longer a church, St. Sophia still looms into the sky, glowing tribute to the soaring imagination and grandeur of Emperor Justinian.

Cyril, the humble Greek priest and missionary, probably symbolises the greatest work of the Empire of Constantinople. Sent in 863 A.D to convert the millions of barbarian Slavs living in the north, Cyril performed one of the noblest feats known to Christendom.

Finding that the Slavs had no alphabet and therefore could never read and write in their own tongues, Cyril invented one, which quickly spread throughout the Balkan lands.

The Bible and church services were quickly translated into Slavic and today the Cyrillic alphabet is still used by the majority of the Slavonic peoples.

Then, in 1000 A.D, Vladimir, the strongest of the Russian overlords, sent envoys to Constantinople to find out about the beliefs of their Orthodox church. They returned with glowing tales of the splendour of the domed basilica of St. Sophia and how they had been dazzled by the church services in the great city.

“There is no such spectacle on earth”, they exclaimed in awe, “nor one of such beauty! We did not know whether we were in heaven or on earth. It is not possible to describe it, but we know that there God dwells in the midst of men.”

Mesmerised by these reports, Vladimir asked the emperor in Constantinople to send him missionaries, architects, lawyers and teachers of the Cyrillic alphabet.

Thus it came to pass that Russian learning and civilisation, which were later to catapult the former Soviet Union into a super power, were launched from Constantinople.

When we peer at these portraits and vignettes of Roman history through the mists of time, we see many different things. We see how entire civilisations were constructed around the life and work of single individuals. We see how great and visionary leaders effectively continue to rule the modern world from their graves.

We see how history lives in our everyday lives and how our ideas and world view have been shaped by men and women of whom we know nothing.

For us who happen to inhabit the lower parts of the African continent, we wonder what happened to our history or whether or not we ever had any history to speak about.

And we begin to ask a few questions. When Justinian was building St. Sophia and his great castles and palaces along the Danube, what were our ancestors in Africa doing?

Why is it that there is hardly anything which can show that we even existed a thousand years ago?

When the Blues and the Greens were shouting themselves hoarse in the pavilions of Constantinople, what were we doing down here in Kenya, Congo or Angola? Where were our pavilions and our circuses and, if they were not there, why were they not there?

When Cyril, the Greek missionary, was inventing a fresh new alphabet for the Slavonic peoples, what were our thinkers and writers doing? Surely we must have had among us some great thinkers, engineers and architects! Or did we not?

If we had, why were we unable to keep any of their monuments or records of them for posterity? Where are our Santa Sophias and our Cyrillic alphabets?

History is bunk, Henry Ford used to say. No wonder he decreed that his company could produce motor cars of any colour as long as they were black. History is not and has never been bunk.

When, a hundred years hence, we peer back at the first 40 years of independent Kenya, what shall we see? Hardly anything. But then that will not be surprising. We just don’t seem to exist. Could there be a missing link somewhere?

The Standard Limited,

Likoni Road, P.o. Box 30080,

Nairobi-Kenya. email: editorial@eastandard.net Tel: +254 2 552510/552516/552520/552522/552526/552533 Fax: +254 2 553939, 552617 Town House, (Newsroom) Tel: +254 2 332658/9/0 Fax: +254 2 337697 Bruce House (Advertising) Tel: +254 2 332088-95, 222282 Fax: +254 2 214048, 218965. email: standard.ads@swiftkenya.com


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Russia
KEYWORDS: africa; balkans; civilization
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
What an amazing article from Kenya! The author even gets the Eastern Roman Empire correct. Byzantium was Rome!

His questions go un-answered by Afro-Centrics.

1 posted on 11/27/2002 2:58:42 PM PST by Destro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *balkans
Romiosini in Africa is spreading
2 posted on 11/27/2002 2:59:15 PM PST by Destro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Destro
Reasons why there is no equivalents to Rome in Africa.

(1) Most African pre-civlized societies had socialist economies. Socialism does not breed innovation.
(2) No literacy or even a written language to pass down knowledge from generation to generation.
(3) All African cultures had brutal dictators at their head. Dictators stifle innovation.
(4) Far too reliant on mysticism and other jibborish. Not enough time spent searching for reasonable solutions to problems.
3 posted on 11/27/2002 3:06:41 PM PST by Sparta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Destro
How long before someone issues a fatwa on this writer?
4 posted on 11/27/2002 3:11:05 PM PST by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Destro
He'll be damned lucky if he isn't killed for saying what he is saying. If somebody there doesn't do it a black power advocate from the U. S. will do it.
5 posted on 11/27/2002 3:11:37 PM PST by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Destro
bump
6 posted on 11/27/2002 3:12:32 PM PST by Centurion2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Destro
I've studied Byzantine history, particularly the works of John Julius Norwich - this letter is amazing, and absolutely right. Byzantium preserved so much of the Roman legacy for Western civilisation, and was a bulwark against Islam. It really is too bad the Western kingdoms could not make up their mind to save Byzantium. Imagine a world in which Constantinople had not fallen.

Regards, Ivan

7 posted on 11/27/2002 3:14:49 PM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Byzantium so detested the Western or Papal Christians, that I am not sure it WANTED to be saved. Better the Turkish Turban than the Roman Miter, some were still saying as the City fell, which is 559 years ago, on a Tuesday morning, in May as I recall.

Christians ought never to enter serious business on a Tuesday, so as to remember this great tragedy for ever.

8 posted on 11/27/2002 3:18:38 PM PST by crystalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Destro
"And we begin to ask a few questions. When Justinian was building St. Sophia and his great castles and palaces along the Danube, what were our ancestors in Africa doing? Why is it that there is hardly anything which can show that we even existed a thousand years ago?"

Your ancestors were living a Stone Age existence; having no written language thus no precise written record of your history. Africans were steeped in tribalism and superstitions, content to watch the world go by as long as game was easy to hunt and food plants easy to gather.
To be fair, there is evidence of ancient metal working (jewelry) and iron smelting in blast furnaces and of course "primitive" art work such as wood carvings (desired by many people today) and cave drawings.
But concerning any technological civilization on par with the ancient civilizations of the Middle East, Greece or Rome, there is none. It just never happened.

9 posted on 11/27/2002 3:27:38 PM PST by StormEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crystalk
Make that 549 years, it pays to proofread.
10 posted on 11/27/2002 3:27:59 PM PST by crystalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: crystalk
Byzantium so detested the Western or Papal Christians

As I recall, Byzantium tried, over a period of 900 years, to mend the fences with Rome. Justinian, to name just one emporer, negotiated with Rome for 38 years. The sticking point, as it was until the fall of Byzantium, was the question of authority.

Rome maintened then, as it sort-of does today, that Jesus made Peter the head of the Church. Peter was the first bishop in Rome - note that he did not found the church in Rome, there was a large Church there already. With Peter as the first Bishop, the Church of Rome maintains that it has the sole authority to define what constitutes Christianity.

In Justinians time, the Patriarch of Constantinople thought that was rather presumptious, since the Church of Rome in the sixth century war rather small and poor in comparison. Even the Churches in Syria and Egypt at that time dwarfed the Church of Rome.

11 posted on 11/27/2002 3:46:52 PM PST by jimtorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jimtorr
But of course I was speaking of the later era, after the two churches had formally ceased to commune in the 11th century...
12 posted on 11/27/2002 3:48:46 PM PST by crystalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Destro
"Today St. Sophia still stands in Constantinople, now the Turkish city of Istanbul......no longer a church....".

An example of Muslim intolerance of other religions.The orthodox christian icons are painted over in black paint.

13 posted on 11/27/2002 4:20:09 PM PST by gitmogrunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Destro
Bump for later read.
14 posted on 11/27/2002 4:23:15 PM PST by MadelineZapeezda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crystalk
Did you correct for Gregorian vs. Julian?
15 posted on 11/27/2002 4:30:37 PM PST by maro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sparta
There weren't exactly robust capitalist economies in any part of the world, at least in "pre" and early history. Remember, the merchants in China were the lowest class(just above peasant) and were often not viewed with any greater love in other empires. No one would call the Aztecs or Mayas or Incas capitalist, but they had just enough innovation(despite their evil religions) to build empires that left a legacy of sorts.

In the book Guns, Germs and Steel, the author puts forth a complex theory of how civilizations develop, stagnate or are engulfed by their superiors. The answer for Africa lay more in the poor assortment of available flora fit for nutritious human diet. There are other reasons why, but I believe this was one of them. THe diversity of edible and domesticable plant and animal life(zebras unlike horses CANNOT be tamed) made development of African civilizations a tall order, though they met with success a few times.
16 posted on 11/27/2002 4:32:17 PM PST by Skywalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: StormEye
The Nubians might take issue with your characterization. They had not only their own civilization centered in places like Meroe, but influence in Egypt, as well.

East Africa had a better environment for settled agriculture, I surmise, from its proximity to the Fertile Crescent. I believe Kenyans are at least partially descended from Nubians and Kushites.
17 posted on 11/27/2002 4:35:11 PM PST by Skywalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Imagine a world in which Constantinople had not fallen.

If it hadn't fallen, the trade routes to India would have remained open to the western Europeans -- who then probably wouldn't have sent guys like Columbus out there sailing in the other direction.

On balance, I'd say it worked out for the better...

18 posted on 11/27/2002 4:35:46 PM PST by TheyConvictedOglethorpe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Destro
Wonderful article, absolutely correct in virtually all particulars. The man knows his history. To quibble just the littlest bit, there is some scholarly dispute over whether the Cyrillic alphabet was actually formulated by Cyril, or whether he simply popularized an indigenous primitive system. No matter, really, the effect was the same.

Incidentally, the ties between Russia go far deeper than this article suggests (simply knowing of the relationship at all is impressive). The Russians tried several times to conquer Constantinople fairly early in its history, and failed. Later, they became allies of a sort, and after the Eastern Empire fell, the Byzantine royal line lived on in the Russia nobility. It is a stretch, but not too great a one, to say that Byzantium lived on after a fashion in Russia. One has only to glance at the architecture of the Kremlin to appreciate the deep relationship between the two powers.

Thanks for posting the piece, the contributions of the Eastern Empire to European culture and civilization are vastly underappreciated.

19 posted on 11/27/2002 4:37:10 PM PST by KellyAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Destro
Most of the letter discusses the fact that Africa had no equivalent to Byzantium. I'll discuss the issue he brings up last, which is why Africa is not currently producing anything of note. Civilization proceeds by building on the advances of other societies. The Roman alphabet was borrowed from the Greek, which was borrowed probably from the Phoenician or something of the sort. Roman civ as a whole was highly derivative of Greek civ. As the saying goes, Rome may have conquered Greece in nomine, but de facto it was Greece that conquered Rome. Japan had a sophisticated civilization pre-Adm Perry, but when confronted with the accomplishments of the West, promptly adopted as many Western customs as it could, down to the Prussian uniforms and the brutal colonialism. When the Chinese study physics, they want to study the physics of Newton and Einstein and Heisenberg and all those other non-Chinese, because that is the tradition that matters. Cultures that progress adopt the best of the civilizations that have demonstrably succeeded, without regard to creed, race, or national origin. Africa is lost in navel-gazing and self-esteem exercises that prevent African nations from joining Western civilization, which is clearly where the action is. Ask the Indians studying C++ by the millions, the Koreans desperately trying to learn more English, the Taiwanese staying up late studying electrical engineering.
20 posted on 11/27/2002 4:46:56 PM PST by maro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson