Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Captain Kirk Principle
Scientific American ^ | December 2002 | Michael Shermer

Posted on 11/26/2002 7:25:35 PM PST by AndrewC

The Captain Kirk Principle
Intuition is the key to knowing without knowing how you know
By Michael Shermer


  1   2   next »

Michael Shermer
Image: BRAD HINES

Stardate: 1672.1. Earthdate: October 6, 1966. Star Trek, Episode 5, "The Enemy Within."

Captain James T. Kirk has just beamed up from planet Alpha 177, where magnetic anomalies have caused the transporter to malfunction, splitting Kirk into two beings. One is cool and rational. The other is impulsive and irrational. Rational Kirk must make a command decision to save the crew, but he is paralyzed with indecision, bemoaning to Dr. McCoy: "I can't survive without him. I don't want to take him back. He's like an animal-- a thoughtless, brutal animal. And yet it's me!"

This psychological battle between intellect and intuition was played out in almost every episode of Star Trek in the characters of the ultrarational Mr. Spock and the hyperemotional Dr. McCoy, with Captain Kirk as the near perfect synthesis of both. Thus, I call this balance the Captain Kirk Principle: intellect is driven by intuition, intuition is directed by intellect.

For most scientists, intuition is the bête noire of a rational life, the enemy within to beam away faster than a phaser on overload. Yet the Captain Kirk Principle is now finding support from a rich emerging field of scientific inquiry brilliantly summarized by Hope College psychologist David G. Myers in his book Intuition: Its Powers and Perils (Yale University Press, 2002). I confess to having been skeptical when I first picked up the book, but as Myers demonstrates through numerous well-replicated experiments, intuition-- "our capacity for direct knowledge, for immediate insight without observation or reason"-- is as much a component of our thinking as analytical logic.

Nalini Ambady and Robert Rosenthal of Harvard University, for example, discovered that evaluations of teachers by students who saw a mere 30-second video of the teacher were remarkably akin to those of students who had taken the course. Even three two-second video clips of the instructor yielded a striking 0.72 correlation with the course students' evaluations.

Research consistently shows how so-called unattended stimuli can subtly affect us. At the University of Southern California, Moshe Bar and Irving Biederman flashed emotionally positive images (kitten, romantic couple) or negative scenes (werewolf, corpse) for 47 milliseconds immediately before subjects viewed slides of people. Although subjects reported seeing only a flash of light for the initial emotionally charged pictures, they gave more positive ratings to people whose photographs had been associated with the positive ones-- so something registered.

Intuition is not subliminal perception; it is subtle perception and learning-- knowing without knowing that you know. Chess masters often "know" the right move to make even if they cannot articulate how they know it. People who are highly skilled in identifying "micromomentary" facial expressions are also more accurate in judging lying. In testing college students, psychiatrists, polygraphists, court judges, police officers and Secret Service agents on their ability to detect lies, only the agents, trained to look for subtle cues, scored above chance.


The Captain Kirk Principle: intellect is driven by intuition, intuition is directed by intellect.

Most of us are not good at lie detection, because we rely too heavily on what people say rather than on what they do. Subjects with damage to the brain that renders them less attentive to speech are more accurate at detecting lies, such as aphasic stroke victims, who were able to identify liars 73 percent of the time when focusing on facial expressions. (Nonaphasic subjects did no better than chance.) We may even be hardwired for intuitive thinking: damage to parts of the frontal lobe and amygdala (the fear center) will prevent someone from understanding relationships or detecting cheating, particularly in social contracts, even if he or she is otherwise cognitively normal.

CONTINUED --- Click Here

(Excerpt) Read more at sciam.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: captkirk; crevolist; drmccoy; inference; insight; intellect; intuition; psychology; science; shermer; skeptic; spock
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last
To: expatpat; MHGinTN
28 -
"The best scientists in the world have invariably been highly intuitive, usually using their more-logical side to confirm their intuitive 'conclusions'."

I agree, at least from personal experience. I get the correct answer, 'intuitively', about 80% of the time, right off the bat. Then it takes a whole lot of work to figure out how I got there. In many cases, when my answer is correct, I cannot figure out how I got it.

My wife was, in many cases, even more 'intuitive', and when, after a few 'experiences', which were to me totally without foundation, things she said were going to happen, actually happened, I gave up arguing with her about it, because she (on critical items which she considered worth pressing), she had about a 95% accuracy.

61 posted on 11/30/2002 10:07:25 PM PST by XBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog; Cincinatus
51 - I agree -

"Intuition has nothing to do with "odds-making." I would call it rather, "subconscious intellectual processing", thinking and reasoning that takes place without us being aware that we are doing it."

Bingo. When I'm faced with a new technical problem, I gather all the possible background information I can find, and study it. Then I just "fuggedaboutit" on a conscious level for a day or so. When next I revisit that need, the solutions are there, ready to be examined logically and used. I don't have the foggiest idea as to how it works, BUT IT DOES WORK, and repeatably so.

62 posted on 11/30/2002 10:36:53 PM PST by XBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: boris
51 - "Now, that dreadful Voyager series, with the captain who thought she was Catherine Hepburn..."

Interesting, you don't like the "Starship Estrogen" either.

63 posted on 11/30/2002 10:44:48 PM PST by XBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
I thought the Captain Kirk Principle was if it's green and has breasts, then sleep with it.
64 posted on 11/30/2002 10:46:23 PM PST by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
well, that girl, green/blue, would be worth sleeping with, no matter what her color. do you remember the name of the actress, as she was absolutely stunning.
65 posted on 11/30/2002 10:57:24 PM PST by XBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson