Skip to comments.
Roswell Incident Had Victims, Program Says
AP
| 11/22/02
Posted on 11/22/2002 8:42:49 PM PST by Davea
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 401-409 next last
To: ozzymandus
BTW, Lets assume there are 10,000,000 pages of some level/quality of documentation available on the whole ET/UFO subject.
How many of them have you read?
Or do 110% of all your responses and opinions tumble out of your very rigid, tidy-little-box closet on cue?
161
posted on
11/23/2002 11:18:39 AM PST
by
Quix
To: Davea
Since conspiracy theories are what this whole Roswell situation is about, there is something that has been bothering me since I watched the show.
Anybody else notice how anti-Republican this show was? Consider:
1. Bryant Gumbel, a diehard liberal whose hero is FDR, hosted it.
2. George H.W. Bush was slammed for refusing Mr. Peanut the Roswell files when he was director of CIA.
3. John Podesta, the little weenie from Willy's administration, was profiled as leading the whackos who want everything declassified. Podesta was shown railing against the current administration for refusing to "tell the American people the truth." (Why didn't somebody ask him why he didn't expose the truth during his EIGHT years in D.C.?)
4. Bill Richardson, another Clintonista, was referred to as "governor" and shown being terribly concerned about the whole situation.
In all fairness, Truman was bashed also. Of course, if he were alive today he'd probably be a Republican so that doesn't count.
Just some random thoughts.
To: ozzymandus
Mercifully, SOME of us have the maturity and wisdom to realize we don't have it all figured out.
The sands of time wear lots of things down ozzy. Eventually, even your perspective will suffer or enjoy some significant alterations.
I hope the wearing leaves an enriching patina instead of devastating cracks in the granite.
163
posted on
11/23/2002 11:24:54 AM PST
by
Quix
To: Undertow
True enough. Therefore what, I don't know.
Given the epidemic of liberal mindlessness and empty heartedness in the media business--i.e. talking heads and technical personnel seem to be 90 odd percent liberal down to their toe jam. So, what would we expect from any "documentary?"
I do suspect that the Dilldo and Shrillery types are just itching to use this whole ball of wax to yield a one world government with them on the top of the heap ASAP. And if UFO stuff/critters can be used to afford them more fun toys to do more of the world's population in with or to yield more of the world's population bowing the knee for various uhhhh services . . . all the better in Dilldo et al's views.
If anyone fits the description of a ruling elite wanting to reduce the world's population to a more easily managed 250,000,000 as some contend--the Dilldo and Shrillery fit the model.
Some say if we aren't wholesale well on the way to getting rid of our fossil fuel use by 2004--via ET zero-point energy generation etc. then the planet will a short number of years thereafter become rapidly dead in a list of ways.
Then there's the business of the ruling elite's dinking around with mysterious weapons they scarcely understand--supposedly threatening the whole galaxy or a string of galaxies with multidimensional chaos--something the ET's seriously want to prevent--but are unsure how to go about it and when given some supposedly heavy noninterventionist rules--prime directive and all.
Then there's the evil ET's the supposedly nice ET's want to help earth citizens wake up to and begin to fight more effectively before it's too late and we all become food slurry.
No end of interesting scenarios in this subject area.
What's fiction and what's real? God knows. Not sure anyone else does.
164
posted on
11/23/2002 11:51:46 AM PST
by
Quix
To: Undertow
Anybody else notice how anti-Republican this show was?Their looking for RAT votes in the desert and reservations.
Most UFO fans and their writers are Rats you know, (Dr. Steven Greer, Whitley Streiber, Peter Gerston et.al.)
Republicans in very high positions have seen UFO's also! Ever hear Ronald Reagan's statement for star-wars technology? Maybe he knew something? Hmmm??
To: Quix
I'm not the one making the screwy claims without proof, Pal. Why don't YOU look in the mirror?
To: dinodino
So, you are as pure as the driven snow.
As I recall, I was enjoying discussing what is AT LEAST a fascinating cultural phenomena--sharing a sampling of the information I've been exposed to. I'm noted a number of times that I can hardly guess what is true vs disinformation etc.
You are the one who decided you were "honor" bound (to tarnish a good word) to assault my sanity and integrity with rather groundless support therefore except your apriori biases and conventional dogma.
I am keenly aware of what's in my mirror. You are the one who seem so out of touch with such things. Perhaps your mirror is shattered--as you seem afraid your world view will be if you entertain the least bit of unconventionality. Ah well, enjoy your tidy little box while you are able. Lots of tidy little boxes are going to be obliterated to shredded before too awfully long.
Then we may see how boastful and confident of your construction on reality you are.
Until then, please, by all means--rant away. Assault away. You're a great example of a stereotypical naysayer without substance and without significant knowledge or authority regarding matters at hand.
167
posted on
11/23/2002 2:16:29 PM PST
by
Quix
To: dinodino
It is a bit sad that you seem to be so emotionally threatened by information you insist is so false and groundless.
168
posted on
11/23/2002 2:20:02 PM PST
by
Quix
To: Las Vegas Dave
And the famous story of Nixon taking Jackie Gleason to see some dead critters and other artifacts--and those living with Gleason at the time--his wife??--describing him as white as a sheet when he returned.
Reagan's comment about the world uniting to defend against ET's--I think it was at the Iceland sumit--I knew at the time that he was knowingly or unknowingly being prophetic or setting things up for something. It was a LOT heavier statement than most people gave notice of.
169
posted on
11/23/2002 2:22:59 PM PST
by
Quix
To: dinodino
BTW, I happen to HAVE a brother who's been there, done that etc.
Where's your brother who can prove otherwise?
170
posted on
11/23/2002 2:24:48 PM PST
by
Quix
To: dinodino
I notice you haven't answered my HOW MANY PAGES HAVE YOU READ question.
I gues it's 0.0.
That would explain your vast knowledge on the subject!
171
posted on
11/23/2002 2:26:11 PM PST
by
Quix
To: Quix
Sorry, I'll make sure I add
Alien Invasion and Paranoid Conspiracy Theories for Dummies
to my nightstand reading pile...
To: Scully
TELL US THE TRUTH YOU REDHEADED DISPENSOR OF WISDOM!!!
WE KNOW THAT DON KING IS THE MESSIAH! ADMIT IT!@!@
To: Saturnalia
WE KNOW THAT DON KING IS THE MESSIAH! ADMIT IT!@!@Don King is not the Messiah...but there is one amongst us who is. I've been tracking his movements for nearly a year. ;-)
175
posted on
11/23/2002 7:01:07 PM PST
by
Scully
To: dinodino
That might be a start.
As has been said,
If you aren't paranoid [in our era],
you aren't paying attention!
I do find it more convincing when rants
come from an experience of at least exposure
to tons of info/evidence.
176
posted on
11/23/2002 8:40:25 PM PST
by
Quix
To: Senator Pardek
I AM curious--genuinely curious--
WHERE, just where did you get such fierce ABSOLUTE confidence regarding such a complex, multidimensional, convoluted, mostly obscure and hidden mess of a topic?
It almost sounds tone-wise like you ascribe to yourself
supernatural, flawless, 100% certain all-knowingness about the topic.
Given what appears to be a sparseness of earned knowledge about the topic, such certainty seems exceedingly extreme.
177
posted on
11/23/2002 9:04:19 PM PST
by
Quix
To: foreverfree
From things that I had been privy to, even thirty years ago at NSA, coupled with what is actually going on today, there's one thing I am certain of, my friend....
...you will not be bored much longer.
To: Quix
"I think there's TONS of stuff both satan AND CERTAINLY GOD have yet to reveal. And then there's "neutral" forces, entities, probably civilizations and world which/who have chosen God's way or the opposition. And how do they factor in with all the straight forward demonic stuff."We are told in the last days "Even the elect will be deceived."
True, many unexplainable mysteries will take place as spiritual battles for the literal souls of God inhabitants intensify between He and Satan. Some of us might say it's already begun. The apparent "material" evidence of ETs obviously further challenges the faith of believers, and will confound the masses, but again -- in the last days the Evil One is to be granted great powers to confuse, delude, and deceive. If mere mortal hypnotists are easily able to work their mojo on other mortals, just imagine the job Satan will be capable of.
Hold on tight -- it's gonna be bumpy ride, however thankfully we still know who is steering the thing ;-)
To: Quix
These types, like Senator Pardek, will always criticise what they don't know and what they fear, caring not to do the research. It's their natural reaction not to 'think outside the box', nor delve seriously into things that are outside their 'comfort zone'.
To simplify, they will not accept what others tell them about an experience until they themselves have an encounter. Then they will join the ridiculed, the 'insane' and 'kook list'. Then and only then will they know and accept anything that is what they consider 'fringe'. Remember the claim "The earth is definitely flat" and "Man will never fly"?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 401-409 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson