Skip to comments.
CLINTON INEPTITUDE, RAGE, DYSFUNCTION BECOME APPARENT ON SENATE FLOOR
FreeRepublic, U.S. Senate
| 11-22-02
| Mia T
Posted on 11/22/2002 4:55:32 AM PST by Mia T
- CLINTON INEPTITUDE, RAGE, DYSFUNCTION BECOME APPARENT ON SENATE FLOOR
- (The CLINTON recession / the CLINTON debacle incarnate: 9/11)
Mrs. CLINTON. [snip] we went back to our last recession under the previous President Bush. We thought that would be a good model as to what was done five times to extend unemployment insurance benefits. [snip]
If it was in some way misguided to rely upon the first Bush administration's extension of unemployment insurance, then we are going to say we did the best we could to look at what had been effective and worked in the past.
Mr. NICKLES. So the answer to my question is that language is still in the bill?
Mrs. CLINTON.We have the same language that was used in the first Bush recession. Now we are in the second Bush recession. We are using the same language. It worked then.
Mr. NICKLES. Will the Senator yield again? So that language is still in there. I will tell my colleague, I will never agree to this language passing. I will also tell my colleague, if she is politicizing this, talking about the first Bush recession and the second Bush recession, the first compensation package did not have the same triggers.[snip]
See Hillary yell at Nickles. But bring along your earplugs |
Had Nichols been Senate Majority Leader during the postmodern Oz called clinton, the Senate would have removed the co-rapist utter failures from office, which may have been in time to thwart both the CLINTON recession and the CLINTON debacle incarnate: 9/11. |
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York; US: Oklahoma
KEYWORDS: clintondysfunction; clintonineptitude; clintonrage; corapist; hillaryclinton; nepotism; prenupsenateseat; unfitforoffice; zipperhoistedwife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
21
posted on
11/22/2002 6:19:12 AM PST
by
Mia T
To: Mia T
"The people's reasoning, which is quite unassailable, goes something like this: If you ain't alive, you can't spend it."Yep. That pretty much says it. Great work Mia....
22
posted on
11/22/2002 6:21:57 AM PST
by
eureka!
To: Mia T
I really like the Chelsea animation.
She is the Clinton legacy, not the stain on Monica's dress.
This girl couldn't boil water. My favorite photo of her was when she sat in w/Albright and Berger during a meeting w/the Israelis.
The Israelis were dumbfounded as she sat there with a note-pad. HA!
23
posted on
11/22/2002 6:34:53 AM PST
by
johnny7
To: rightwing2
-
- Schippers, who was hired by House Judiciary Chairman Henry Hyde (R-Ill.) as chief investigative counsel for the impeachment, labels the process one of "lies, cowardice, hypocrisy, cynicism, amorality, butt-covering."
-
Schippers Book May Rock Senate
|
- ...The House Managers were real heroes. Trent Lott stabbed them in the back. They were not allowed to argue their case or to present any witnesses. Regardless of the final vote, one hundred (100) senators agreed from the start to go along with the bogus rules dreamed up by Lott and Daschle. That ended any possibility of a fair trial based on the evidence. They all broke their oaths of office and their trial oaths by doing this.
-
--Cicero
|
- Historians will record that Republicans could not muster the necessary sixty-seven vote Senate majority to convict the President at trial.
-
- Those same historians should note, if only in a footnote, that not a single senator made the trip to the Ford Building to review documentation of Clinton's "nauseating", "alarming" and "horrific" sexual misconduct; evidence that ultimately made the difference in the impeachment vote.
-
America's Impeachment Secret
|
- Musings:
- Senatorial Courtesy Perverted
-
- by Mia T
-
-
-
- Well, with the help of the 100 corrupt and cowardly cullions, clinton
- walked. The senators' justification for their acquittal votes requires
- the suspension of rational thought (and, in the curious case of Arlen
- Specter, national jurisdiction).
-
- I don't think it's over, though.
-
- There are cloakroom whispers of incipient (spiked) charges and imminent
- (spike heel) shoe-droppings.
-
- And from Drudge:
- Broaddrick is talking to WSJ's Dorothy Rabinowitz in Arkansas while 60
- MINUTES is "circling" the clinton rape covered wagon.
-
- Of course, a clenched-jawed clinton reeks revenge. I suppose the best
- take is that, at the very least, his utter degeneracy has been exposed,
- no one of any import will ever believe him again, and he is effectively
- muzzled and hog-tied for the rest of his tenure.
-
- All this while hillary indecorously impales herself on the horns of a
- dilemma. (I am finding the farm animal metaphor for this pair especially
- cathartic today.) hillary's megalomania pushes her toward a Senate run
- in which her opposion will doubtless dredge up her criminality. What to
- do?
-
- Clinton's acquittal is reducible, I think, to the fact that the
- irrational fear of the "right" whipped up by clinton spinners (watch
- them spin), has trumped the very rational fear of the pseudo-leftist
- psychopath.
-
- A final thought (for now):
- To spite us all, Arthur Schlesinger will live
- to 120 just so he can write the definitive clinton hagiography.
-
-
-
|
One more...
- Hillary has found that the best refuge for a co-scoundrel is the Senate--where they take very seriously the concept of courtesy.--
-
--Hillary's Solo Act - Vanity Fair
|
-
-
-
24
posted on
11/22/2002 6:51:36 AM PST
by
Mia T
To: Mia T; Johnny Shear
Thanks Mia, I love your stuff. You, Registered and a few other talented, creative types are the reason I haunt this place...
On the other hand, there are some others who's posts tend to have the opposite effect...
25
posted on
11/22/2002 7:00:01 AM PST
by
skeeter
To: Mia T
For the people--from 9/11 forward--clinton fecklessness and self-protection in the face of terror will always trump the pocketbook.
The people's reasoning, which is quite unassailable, goes something like this: if you ain't alive, you can't spend it.
I do not post this to be argumentative. However, there is one other factor that should be kept in mind. The very short memory of "the people."
If the war on terrorism is waged so thoroughly and successfully that terrorist activity is rendered minimal in the last two years of the second Bush administration, then the people will quickly relax, and give in to the temptation to give the Democrats another chance.
Ironic isn't it: Hildabeasts' best chance rests with the Republicans ability to handle the tough stuff.
26
posted on
11/22/2002 7:02:28 AM PST
by
ricpic
To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
Bump
To: ricpic
Interesting point.
Sadly, I suspect that terrorist events will be a recurrent--and hence omnipresent--problem irrespective of any Bush success.
For the electorate, fear of terrorism will supplant chronic malaise, rendering the clintons--and any democrat, for that matter--rather unelectable.
28
posted on
11/22/2002 7:22:46 AM PST
by
Mia T
To: Mia T
Bump for the Hillary-Rage retelling. (Had not seen this).
Sounds like Senator Nichols (I love that guy!) caught the witch lying in the bill she was submitting - either lying or PURPOSEFULLY INCOMPETENT.
Either way - thank you, Senator Nichols! And thank you, MiaT!
To: skeeter
Try reading one of the posts in question while using a dialup...Smartass.
To: Mia T; Johnny Shear
Mia, I sent this out in the morning mail...
Johnny, there is some danged "undocumented" IE keystroke that aborts graphics... I think it's either alt-space or cntrl-space... let me see if I can locate it... nope, no luck in a web search, but I'd swear it's something like that.
31
posted on
11/22/2002 7:27:54 AM PST
by
backhoe
To: Mia T
Awesome compilation, Mia. I especially like your graphic of clinton blowing his horn.
32
posted on
11/22/2002 7:42:40 AM PST
by
Arizona
To: Johnny Shear
Try reading one of the posts in question while using a dialup...Smartass. Nobody forced you to open this thread.
33
posted on
11/22/2002 7:59:37 AM PST
by
skeeter
To: Mia T
Thanks, Mia T. I enjoyed.
To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
Thanks for the heads up!
To: ricpic
We know that huge numbers of Americans voted for Bill Clinton in '96 for only one reason; they were doing well financially.
Actually, if you remember--and it's apparent you don't--huge numbers did NOT vote for Bill Clinton either in '92 or '96. And your political analysis is as bad as your memory.
36
posted on
11/22/2002 8:07:10 AM PST
by
aruanan
To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
- "From the money to the media manipulation, she gets it."
-
(Hillary) Clinton in Line For Key Post
Al Capone Q ERTY6 kleptocratic clinton & clinton were utter failures REALITY-CHECK I say forget the clinton rapes & murders & pardons & payoffs & treason & so on & PINCH the CLINTONS for grand larceny & tax evasion) bump!
-
-
Alcatraz Federal Penitentiary (Associated Press)
-
Capone consulted attorney, Mike Ahern, in 1929. Ahern, with
-
other Capone attorneys, filed several appeals to stave off Capone's
-
11-year sentence for tax evasion. The last one was rejected in May,
-
1932. (photograph by Jun Fujita, ICHi-14414)
|
pinch (pînch) v. pinched, pinching, pinches.
- --tr.
- 1. To squeeze between the thumb and a finger, the jaws of a tool, or other edges.
- 2. To squeeze or bind (a part of the body) in such a way as to cause discomfort or pain: These shoes pinch my toes.
- 3. To nip, wither, or shrivel: buds that were pinched by the frost; a face that was pinched with grief.
- 4. To straiten: "A year and a half of the blockade has pinched Germany" (William L. Shirer).
- 5. Slang. To take (money or property) unlawfully; steal. See Synonyms at steal.
- 6. Slang. To take into custody; arrest.
- 7. To move (something) by means of a pinch bar.
- 8. Nautical. To head (a boat) very close into the wind.
- --intr.
- 1. To press, squeeze, or bind painfully: This collar pinches.
- 2. To be miserly.
- 3. Nautical. To drag an oar at the end of a stroke.
|
- PINCH CLINTON
- by Mia T, 2.9.02
-
-
- In a quainter, less enlightened time, if you had read "pinch" and "clinton" in the same sentence, you would have thought, "hundreds of 'ministered to' troubled young girls," (as the wife was wont to put it)... not "roomfuls of stolen White House antiques."
-
- And yet, according to a reliable-source friend of mine, even back in those days, if the husband had designs on the help, the wife had designs on the furnishings; (she had already acquired the nasty habit of pilfering from the White House drapery fund.)
-
-
- In spite of this, when I created the following metaphoric musing more than a year before the clintons -- uh -- "moved," I never imagined that she would -- that they would -- in real life -- in real time -- actually swipe the sofa.
-
-
-
- Smaller objects neatly tuck-able in nuncupative deals & unnumbered Swiss accounts, without question...
-
- BUT THE SOFA??
-
"I think the rock is still there, but I'm not sure," Helen quipped. Her punch line to clinton's response to her question about a -- (only in Helen's mind) 'fantasy' -- clinton kleptocracy, was in fact 4th-estate CYA-ing disguised as a joke. Unbeknownst to the always clueless Helen, the one-liner she was delivering was indeed a joke; it was the butt of the joke that was her misreport... |
-
- She said the press corps followed a "golden rule that if it didn't affect the running of the country, they didn't need to report on it. We weren't protecting anybody."
-
- As President Bill Clinton reached his last days in office, Thomas asked him what White House possession he would like to take with him.
-
- His reply: the rock Neal Armstrong brought back from the moon. Whenever tension filled the Oval Office, Clinton said, he would point to the rock and tell those present to "chill out." The rock was 3.6 billion years old, he said; they needed perspective.
-
- "I think the rock is still there, but I'm not sure," Thomas said.
-
Helen Thomas: Bush-A Work in Progress |
- In the end,
- if clinton's arrogant, ruthless, reckless nature is restored to him,
- it seems the joke will be on all of us,
- for it will be a victory for infinite victimhood and irresponsibility,
- for seduction, for violence, for nihilism, for anarchy.
-
- We will have set apart clinton as the hero
- by making his victims less human than he;
- we will have allowed clinton to carefully estrange us from his victims
- so that we can enjoy the rapes and the beatings
- as much as clinton himself does.
-
Mia T, A CLOCKWORK ORANGE -
-
-
-
-
|
more
and MORE
HILLARY: I RETURNED GIFTS TO THE NATIONAL ARCHIVE [SOCKS BAGS BAG]
Is hillary clinton's $8M "book advance" a Peter-Principle artifact?
37
posted on
11/22/2002 8:11:13 AM PST
by
Mia T
Comment #38 Removed by Moderator
To: Mia T
My favorite from this thread.
To: aruanan; All
Clearly someone should notify America's founders that they have erred... men are not deserving of self goverment, because clearly self government is nothing more than the aggregation of all our psychic traumas and libidinal confusions.. and look where that has gotten us...one Clinton leaving the white house and one aiming for the US Senate for the State of New York... perhaps the liberals ARE onto something? But no, study the last two Clinton elections carefully... this most shameless and shameful American President is the product of plurality (less than majority) votes obtained through the gile and intrigue of an elitist cabal of intellectually impaired and ethically corrupt media manipulators aligned in effect with the electoral tampering of one man, H. Ross Perot, who although he occasionally gave a good speech was still intelligent enough to know his only role was to twice deny the conservative majority of American voters a first choice for President. Gail Wynand, "Be Liberal, Live in Ignorance and Servitude"
|
- LUCINDA FRANKS: I think you're wrong because, after about two years of -- of working on this, you know, on and off, I think the president -- that the teenage culture caused the president's behavior in the way he behaved in -- with the oral sex.
-
- BILL O'REILLY: I think you're crazy, Ms. Franks, with all due respect.
Fellating Kids and clinton Degeneracy: The Revisionism Begins -
-
"Be Liberal, Live in Ignorance and Servitude" by Gail Wynand
liberals have always had problems figuring out causation. they believe for example that because people who smoke (sometimes) have higher rates of cancer than people who don't that smoking CAUSES cancer, worse, they believe that if people get cancer it is the fault of the "tobacco companies" (ie caused by the manufactures of tobacco products). They further believe that the remedy for this fault is that billions of dollars in "damages" should be transferred from the wealth of stockholders in tobacco companies to a handful of plaintiffs lawyers including the First lady's relatives and others closely associated with the Democratic party. And they believe, apparently, that if young people are now experimenting with sex at early ages and with more profoundly explicit practices than in past years, and that if the President of the United States decides to enroll a young intern in rendition of such services to his middle aged libido resultantly staining both her dress and Americas reputation, that a spontaneous wave of teenage sex experimentation, sucked (sorry) the poor middle aged chief executive into its vortex. deducing causation in most events takes deliberate, focused, thought, insight, and a disciplined intelligence that doesnt skip foundational indoctrination (aka actually studying in school). Causation of the diseases associated with cancer is highly complex and to a large degree still unknown. That smoking is probably not healty for you is well known. That a middle aged chief executive, Yale Law School graduate, former professor of Constitutional Law and State Attorney General should be responsible and accountable for his own actions including HIS perjury and obstruction of justice would seem axiomatic to all but a liberal who has the capacity to adopt causationally convenient theories based solely on tangential proximity to the event under examination rather than through any rational analysis of the importance or significance of the asserted cause to the event. Thus, "guns" are used in some murders therefore, to a liberal all "guns" should be either banned or kept in locked safes with trigger locks so as to disarm the law abiding public and eviscerate their legally recognized right to effective self defense. Quite simply, one has to be pretty stupid or very corrupt or both to be a liberal, at least and for sure to be a Clinton supporter. But it is worse than that, one also has to deny the importance of human conciousness and free will. That is, a Clinton defending liberal apparently believes that childhood psychic trauma, teenage sex trends (remarkably and largely only rampant among the social classes targeted by liberals for social intervention for the past 40 years) and the power of "addiction" which used to be considered merely "habituation" in more stalwart times, are more significant than free will in determining human conduct.
- Clearly someone should notify America's founders that they have erred... men are not deserving of self goverment, because clearly self government is nothing more than the aggregation of all our psychic traumas and libidinal confusions.. and look where that has gotten us...one Clinton leaving the white house and one aiming for the US Senate for the State of New York... perhaps the liberals ARE onto something? But no, study the last two Clinton elections carefully... this most shameless and shameful American President is the product of plurality (less than majority) votes obtained through the gile and intrigue of an elitist cabal of intellectually impaired and ethically corrupt media manipulators aligned in effect with the electoral tampering of one man, H. Ross Perot, who although he occasionally gave a good speech was still intelligent enough to know his only role was to twice deny the conservative majority of American voters a first choice for President. And now even as Evita determiniedly grasps for the Security Power and Influence of the Senate seat, one sees in her early campaigning the overriding awareness that her only hope is the sowing of confusion and ignorance... the demonization of a long time public servant whose accomplishments are towering, the pandering to the lowest and most depraved and corrupt anti social organizations and figures (no not the mob, the teachers unions and Mr. Sharpton). Arm in arm this body of liberal enthusiasts march forth to assure that America continues to be contaminated and dissabled by their control of government into the 21st century... arrogantly and in complete disregard of truth, rationality, or the notion of liberty... they pound at the very gates of freedom, threatening to burn (redefine to mean the opposite of what they say) the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence and the Gettysburg Address and replace them with their own Orwellian Banners of "community" "children" "education" "fairness" and all the other focus group tested liberal-illogicsms. But the translation exists and when the alien identifying sunglasses are donned all of their slogans can be seen to read "Be Liberal, Live in Ignorance and Servitude"
|
40
posted on
11/22/2002 8:45:58 AM PST
by
Mia T
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson