Posted on 11/20/2002 10:05:47 AM PST by Temple Owl
Oh - so that's why Rice is the National Security Advisor.
But what about 9/11?
There was a huge difference between 1964 and 1965 in the South, thanks to the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
There you go!
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 outlawed segregation in the United States.
Laws are broken every minute of every day so what is the point of your post?
Is that why the White House doesn't want an independent commission to investigate what went wrong?
The "whole attitude" of the South did not change, but there was a huge difference between 1964 and 1965 because of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Not so, prior to the Civil Rights Act of 1964, segregation was legal and the segregated person had no legal recourse.
So, why would I even try to intimidate someone here? Your paranoia is unbecoming. Don't go crying victim. That's so, what's the word? Leftist maybe?
Shine on you crazy diamond.
Coming soon: Tha SYNDICATE.
101 things that the Mozilla browser can do that Internet Explorer cannot.
Perhaps because you are unable to put together a resonable argument?
Your paranoia is unbecoming. Don't go crying victim.
I don't cry victim!
I also don't become intimidated easily!
Hillary is a big, fat-legged liar...so, the angelic Ms. Rice must also be exposed as a liar! (like he knows anything about the town Condi grew up in--hahahahaha)
Tuco and his fellow party members have been horribly maimed. He's a zombie troll.
Some people would rather cherry-pick posts than to debate rationally.I'm done dealing with your lies and skewed vision of reality. Let's just suffice it to say that you have some sort of personal problem with Dr. Rice. Whether it's political, ideological, or racial, I don't know, nor care. You have made a determination that you will manufacture evidence to support your fallacies. And you truly are someone worth pitying. I pity you because you'll never grow beyond your pettiness.
Good day, Mr. "Ugly."
He's not supposed to, mhking. Tuco is a troll. Cherry picking posts and manufacturing nonsense arguments against Rice is what he does for fun.
Tuco is not a serious poster. He does not come here and present serious argument. That is not what he is here for. He is a troll. Period.
He decided to jump ugly on another Condi thread yesterday. Same style. Same bullshit. His style is to present an assertion, then avoid the counterargument by restating the original assertion as if it was fact.
This is the hallmark of the Usenet Troll. I saw plenty of them back in the nineties when I posted on Usenet. Anyway, yesterday I figured out the Tuco was projecting. Here's my take.
Condi Rice is the woman that Tuco can never have because he simply doesn't rate a woman like her. I would be surprised if any of us here could even rate a second look from her. So why get pissed off about it when we get to vote for her someday? Unfortunately, Tuco doesn't think that way. Anyway, most of us are married and middle class, so we're out of the running. So I figure that he's got a Condi Rice Blow-Up Doll somewhere that needs to be confiscated.
In the end, when he tires of trolling on Condi posts, he'll go to other threads and post there. Think of Tuco as a polite version of Eschoir.
But remember, my black conservative friend, you're dealing with a troll. And there's one rule that should always be remembered.....
Don't Feed the Troll!
Be Seeing You,
Chris
Shine on you crazy diamond.
Coming soon: Tha SYNDICATE.
101 things that the Mozilla browser can do that Internet Explorer cannot.
As someone who grew up in the South and worked as a drug store soda fountain waitress in a small town in the South one summer, let me simply say you are wrong.
Mothers can dream, I guess.
Thus, Con dolceza, "With Sweetness" in Italian piano music instructions, became Condoleezza.
You two share a rich heritage in bestowing names.
Maybe because you both came from backgrounds where dreams had to be built into the name in order to overcome future obstacles in life.
No. Dr. Rice said she had bought a comic book and an ice cream there, and had not been refused service. Thus she was not segregated in her purchases.
However, what you may not be aware of is that "pickaninnies", black children, were often given leeway and allowed to buy in "white only" drug stores before 1964 as long as they remained standing and didn't sit at the counter. The white only waitresses wouldn't serve grownups or sometimes even teenagers, but often would serve children coming to the end of the counter and quietly requesting to buy an ice cream cone and take it outside to eat it. This was a common practice where I worked, and the white waitresses liked to prove they were kind by acquiescing to the little children while giving the older children and adults who knew better only a cold stare of dislike.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.